Childhood Immunization Should be Mandatory Discussion
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Childhood Immunization Should be Mandatory Discussion
Marsha Fuerst School of Nursing
Jessamine David
ENG 101
Ms. Tori Muir
November 15, 2021
Childhood Immunization Should be Mandatory
Although various agencies and organizations often recommend childhood vaccines, most parents, especially new parents, have remained overwhelmed when it comes to vaccinations. According to Medical Writer Lee Ventola, immunization for children has become one of the controversial issues that countries across the world experience. Currently, no rule requires every child to get a vaccination; however, some countries have adopted regulations that enhance childhood immunization except for some groups. For instance, it is a requirement in all the states in the United States that every child that attends a public school must get vaccinated. However, most states provide exemptions to children based on factors such as religious beliefs. Although many people oppose childhood immunization, it should be mandatory because of its many positive effects on the lives of individuals.
Immunization is crucial since it protects individuals from diseases and those around them who might be suffering from underlying conditions. As Health Psychologists, Birthe Lehman and Danielle Timmermans, Medical Doctor, Hester de Melker, and Epidemiologist Liesbeth Mollema mentioned, vaccination significantly improves the immune system that fights diseases. Not only does childhood immunization offer protection against deadly diseases like polio and diphtheria, but also it reduces or eliminates conditions that spread from one child to another. No doubt, vaccines are part or weakened versions of germs causing certain conditions. When a child’s body is exposed to such, the immune system can develop antibodies that protect them from diseases even if they are exposed to the conditions.
According to World Health Organization’s data, there were more than 130,000 measles deaths worldwide, with children below five years as the most affected group in 2018. Children are vaccinated against some conditions that are usually passed from one person to another through the air. According to University of Southampton Professors, Richard Clarke and Pauline Patterson, and Researchers, Sandra Mounier-Jack, Jemma Walker, and Sadie Bell, this puts everyone in contact with children suffering from these conditions at risk of infections. World Health Organization also provides that vaccination prevents about 2.5 million deaths annually. This would tremendously reduce deaths, mainly among children. With this in mind, what would happen if all countries across the globe managed to achieve 100 percent immunization with 100 percent vaccine efficacy?
Among the most affected groups in society, unvaccinated children are most likely to suffer from the conditions. The most successful and cost-effective way for parents to protect their children and countries as a whole is through immunization. While it might be challenging to determine the value of the vaccine given to children, it is vital to consider its impact on the economic growth, sustainability, and efficiency of various healthcare systems. Childhood immunization has improved children’s health conditions. It contributes towards enhancing economic growth due to reduced spending on medications for unvaccinated children (Lrhmann, 2017).
Considering another view, children’s vaccination is a form of investment in human capital. Improving children’s health conditions results in higher productivity and thus more earnings when they become adults. This technique promotes the success of countries that provide services to ensure immunization than one that does not. Despite the long delay between a child immunization with the standard vaccines and entering work, estimates that child immunization leads to about 18 percent return around, which is almost the same as the rate primary education contributes as an investment in human capital (Ventola, 2016). Consequently, ensuring access to immunization for every child and other investment aspects would create a great society with a high level of human capital, thus reducing poverty.
Parents who fear having their children vaccinated should know that immunization is safe and effective because it is only given to children after careful research performed by scientists, doctors, and other healthcare professionals. According to Pediatric Doctors, Saman Herath, Tusara Kudagammana, Tisha Sarathchandra, Thoranage Gamage, and Mageen Razik, before being released, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) often test and approve the vaccines. In this regard, immunization is safe. However, some children might experience minor side effects like a slight fever, site pain, and cough. In several instances, the dangers of diseases are much greater than the risk from the side effect of the vaccine. This adds to the reasons for parents to ensure that every child gets vaccinated.
Even with the positive impacts of childhood immunization, some people still present a compliance spectrum with having children vaccinated. The individuals often put forward several factors for their opposing views and hesitancy. Some people reject childhood immunization due to their religious beliefs. The beliefs are always linked to parents, and it is challenging to convince them to change their views against vaccination. Most people who oppose this vaccination due to their religious beliefs claim that the components used in producing the vaccines, especially animal-derived gelatin, and human fetus, go against their beliefs, thus a significant concern.
While there is evidence showing that vaccines are safe, other parents still object to the vaccines for fear that their children may develop autism. This has, over the years, created a controversy that surrounds the use of vaccines, thus increasing parents’ opposition towards childhood immunization (Herath, 2018). Most people speculate about the causes of autism, and as a result, they associate them with vaccines that children receive at a younger age. In this regard, the individuals constantly question the role of immunization and its associated risk factors to children. Further, individuals claim that the vaccines could affect genetic predisposition and other factors associated with the condition’s occurrence.
A new study conducted to assess the misguided beliefs that drive vaccine opposition in the United States indicated that about 20 percent of Americans negatively view vaccines. This has been associated with misperceptions that make individuals pose negative vaccine beliefs (Ventola, 2016). No doubt, such kinds of beliefs and attitudes spread from one generation to another. As a result, some people oppose anything to do with childhood immunization because it has been the trend, and they are not willing to go against their belief event if they have experienced the consequences of not vaccinating their children.
Various strategies must be put in place to overcome the opposition to childhood immunization. First, there is a great need for healthcare professionals to provide adequate information on the importance of vaccines and their associated side effects. This will enable individuals to understand why children require immunization regardless of their beliefs (Lehmann, 2017).
Second, it is essential to develop effective interventions that include counseling the public members, especially parents, to eliminate negative attitudes. Lastly, governments should improve access to vaccinations as individuals in disadvantaged socioeconomic groups might experience challenges that hinder them from ensuring that their children are vaccinated.
Childhood immunization is vital to every child due to its benefits that range from health to economic status. The vaccinations improve the immune systems of minors and reduce the mortality rate. For many years, diseases such as measles have proved to be the leading causes of health issues in various countries; however, improved access to vaccination has significantly reduced the problem. Therefore, childhood immunization should be compulsory. Achieving this will require providing adequate information on the importance of vaccines and their access to everyone.
References
Bell, S., Clarke, R., Paterson, P., & Mounier-Jack, S. (2020). Parents’ and guardians’ views and experiences accessing routine childhood vaccinations during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: A mixed-methods study in England. PloS one, 15(12), e0244049.
Herath, S.C, Kudagammana, T., Sanathchandra, T. T., Gamage, H. K., Razik, I. M., & Liynapathirana, V. (2018). Brief report: Parental attitudes and knowledge on routine childhood immunization: an experience from Central Sri Lanka. BMC research notes, 11(1), 1-5.
Lehmann, B. A., De Melker, H. E., Timmermans, D. R., & Mollema, L. (2017). Informed decision-making in the context of childhood immunization. Patient education and counseling, 100(12), 2339-2345.
Ventola, C. L. (2016). Immunization in the United States: recommendations, barriers, and measures to improve compliance: part 1: childhood vaccinations. Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 41(7), 426.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!