CCCHWC After School Sports Case Study
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
CCCHWC After School Sports Case Study
Case Study # 2 – AFTER SCHOOL SPORTS
Christopher was an athletic seventh grader, and he loved sports. Christopher, or Chris as most people call him, has a visual impairment, and he is at risk for a detached retina, so he is in a modified physical education (PE) class at his school. Chris had a wonderful multidisciplinary team that met several times during the year to ensure he had appropriate accommodations in his PE class for his retinal detachment issue. Chris did not want any special treatment due to his visual impairment, so the team had to make some compromises with him so he could participate safely.
Chris directed his own disability awareness program with his classmates. With the help of his teacher of the visually impaired and his PE teacher, his friends got to wear occludes to see what he sees and do some of the sports they were doing in PE. They said that they had no idea what it was that he saw and that the awareness activity was very helpful for them (Lieberman, Ponchillia, & Ponchillia, 2013).
Chris went to a sports camp each summer and did many sports, both after-school sports and Paralympic sports. He knows that he is a good athlete and was beginning to teach the younger campers at his summer camp. Chris wanted to be on his after-school modified soccer team, but the athletic director and the coach felt that it was too dangerous due to his visual impairment.
Chris’ mother encouraged him to be on his school cross-country team. Again, the athletic director and the coach of the cross-country team felt that he was going to get hurt or hurt somebody else and were reluctant to let him join. Chris was adamant about joining the team, as he loved to run and had done very well at his summer sports camp.
The coach was worried, as he had no guide for him at the time. The coach said that he could join the team if he ran with one of his parents. So, for the first week, Chris’ mother came to his practices with him. There were several issues with this and one of them was that Chris was fast and his mother was holding him back. The other was that nobody else had to bring a parent to run with them, and this was just not appropriate or legal (US Department of Education, 2013).
The athletic director called Chris’s camp director and asked her to help him find someone to run with Chris. He was still very reluctant and was feeling that it was not going to work. The coach also agreed about people getting hurt and liability. The camp director helped them connect with one of Chris’s former counselors, Mr. Wood, who was student teaching nearby. They hired him to run with Chris. This was a good and comfortable solution for the moment. Mr. Wood and Chris held a tether, a short rope between them, so Chris could be guided safely. This is the same system used in the Paralympics and big races like the Boston marathon with blind runners (Davis, 2011; Depauw & Gavron, 2005). Fortunately, the New York High School Athletic Association had guide running as one of the acceptable forms of modifications for cross-country. Many athletes in the state of New York use tethers in cross-country and in track and field.
In the first race of the season with 66 runners, Chris placed third. He was elated, as were his parents. He made a personal best time, and he knew that he belonged on the team. Then, two races later came another problem; Chris was too fast for Mr. Wood at this point.
They had to do something and fast. They put out an ad for a guide runner, and fortunately there was a cafeteria worker who had run on his college cross-country team. He was fast and available at practice and meet times. Chris continued to come in the top five in his meets. He had shown the athletic director and the coach that, yes, he could run and be competitive despite his visual impairment. Chris was elated as he had found a sport he loved and that was accessible for him.
Chris did not want the season to end. He decided to go out for the swim team. The swim coach, Ms. Potenza, was reluctant to allow Chris to be on the team. She had never coached a swimmer who was visually impaired. She called the camp director and got information on the instructional techniques to use with Chris and ways to help him know when the lane ended (Camp Abilities, n.d.).
The instructional techniques were tactile modeling, where Chris felt her body move through the motions, and physical guidance, where she moved him through the motion of each new stroke. Chris also excelled on his after-school swim team. Chris now has his eyes set on track and field and already knows his distances and has his guide set for the season.
Facilitation Questions
- What is the critical issue in this case?
- Are there related issues? If so, what are they?
- What are some of the specific elements that contribute to these issues?
- Who are the characters in the case?
- What role did the characters play in creating and solving these issues?
- What are some of the suggested strategies you might try to address these issues in your school OR program(s)?
- What accommodations are required, if any?
CCCHWC After School Sports Case Study
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!