Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Assessment 4: Case Presentation
Develop a presentation of the patient’s case for stakeholders, supplemented by 10–15 slides with notes.
Note: Each assessment in this course builds on your work from the preceding assessment; therefore, complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented.
The ability of care coordinators to deliver effective presentations can have a significant impact on the quality of patient care, particularly when addressing a diverse group of stakeholders, including the patient, family members, and multiple providers in a range of different settings. This assessment provides an opportunity for you to present Mrs. Snyder’s case to stakeholders.
Communication and interdisciplinary collaboration include the patients and their families or significant others. Care coordinators understand that patients may need help navigating the complex health care system and that partnering with patients and their families improves education, safety, and patient outcomes.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 2: Explain the effect of societal, economic, and interprofessional factors on patient outcomes and the care coordinator’s role.
Identify the factors that could affect outcomes for a patient.
Competency 3: Evaluate care coordination plans and outcomes according to performance measures and professional standards.
Determine the resources needed to implement continuing care.
Competency 4: Develop collaborative interventions that address the needs of diverse populations and varied settings.
Identify the goals, elements, and overall scope of a plan for continuing care.
Explain how an interprofessional care team delivers high-quality patient outcomes.
Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
Present patient case information to stakeholders clearly and accurately.
Support main points, arguments, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Competency Map
CHECK YOUR PROGRESSUse this online tool to track your performance and progress through your course.
Toggle DrawerResources
Asssessment InstructionsNote: Complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.
Preparation
For your final assessment, you will present Mrs. Snyder’s case to the health care team, including all internal and external stakeholders and key family members. The purpose of the presentation is to ensure that everyone connected with Mrs. Snyder’s case is well informed and that they have a common understanding of her care to date and of plans for providing the best possible patient-centered care.
To prepare for the presentation, you are encouraged to review the care plan and the transitional care plan that you developed for Mrs. Snyder in Assessments 2 and 3.
Note: Remember that you can submit all or a portion of your presentation draft to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version for this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback.
Presentation Software
You may use Microsoft PowerPoint or any other suitable presentation software to create your slides. Use the speaker’s notes section of each slide to develop your talking points and cite your sources, as appropriate. If you need help designing your presentation, you are encouraged to review the various presentation resources provided.
Inclusion of audio voiceover or video is optional. Required information should be included in the slides and speaker notes.
You may use Kaltura or another technology of your choice to record your presentation. If using Kaltura, refer to the Using Kaltura page for directions on recording and uploading your video in the courseroom.
Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:
Assessment 4 Example [PPTX].
Requirements
Develop a presentation of your patient’s case for stakeholders.
Presentation Format and Length
Your slide deck should consist of 10–15 slides, not including the title slide, objectives slide, and references slide.
Supporting Evidence
Cite 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence to support your presentation.
List your sources on the references slide at the end of your presentation.
Developing the Presentation
The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your case presentation addresses each point, at a minimum. Read the Case Presentation Scoring Guide to better understand how each criterion will be assessed.
Identify the goals, elements, and overall scope of a plan for continuing care.
Include a high-level overview of the care plan and the transitional care plan, with relevant background on the patient.
Explain how an interprofessional care team delivers high-quality patient outcomes.
Include and address the various roles associated with particular care coordination functions.
Cite credible evidence to support your conclusions.
Consider the informational needs of various stakeholders and their familiarity with care coordination.
Identify the factors that could affect outcomes for a patient.
Specify the information on which are you basing your conclusions.
Note any assumptions you are making about the specific patient, her needs, and the nature of ongoing care.
Determine the resources needed to implement continuing care.
Identify the factors that influence your determination.
Justify your assertions, specific to Mrs. Snyder’s case.
Present patient case information to stakeholders clearly and accurately.
Express your main points and conclusions coherently.
Proofread your slides to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it difficult to focus on the substance of your presentation.
Support main points, arguments, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Ensure that the evidence you provide is clear, explicit, and understood by all stakeholders.
Additional Requirements
Submit your slide deck and, if you included audio voiceover or video, a link to your recording. If you used technology other than PowerPoint or Kaltura to create your slides or recording, make sure to submit any other relevant documentation or links for this assessment.
Portfolio Prompt: You may choose to save your presentation to your ePortfolio.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!