Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Use your words as much as possible as well as incorporating your critical thinking. Do not merely “cut and paste.” When referring to readings, always cite and use APA.
INCORPORATE REQUIRED READINGS AND VIDEO TO EXPLAIN YOUR ANSWER. *Cite* APA when needed in your text response. Use your own words.
Ways to avoid plagiarism. Plagiarism involves (but is not limited to):
Failure to acknowledge the sources of information that are neither common nor personal knowledge. When in doubt, cite it out!
Failure to place another’s direct words in quotation marks or to indent in the case of longer quotations. If a passage is copied in the exact words of the original text, it must be placed in quotation marks in addition to the citation of the source.
Failure to document a source that has been paraphrased. When using information from a source, put the ideas into your own words, and then clearly document the source. Not putting the idea into your own words would mean you would have a direct quotation.
The following are court cases that are assigned to last name groups. Please look for your last name group, read the case, and conduct a summary. However, for your weekly discussion is to post an analysis of the case.The analysis is the evaluation of the significance of the case, its relationship to similar cases, its place in history, and what is shown about the Court, its members, its decision-making processes, or the impact it has on litigants, government, or society.
Below is an example of an analysis of a case. After reading the court case summary and identifying a part of the case that is crucial to the ruling and discuss why.
1. The issue: Name the issue of the case.
This case involves a first amendment issue regarding the right of a city to limit expression.
2. The law: The amendment that is broken or in question.
The first amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the federal government from making any law abridging the freedom of speech. This prohibition has been applied to the states (and their political subdivisions such as cities) via the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment. So generally, courts look with disfavor on any law which abridges the freedom of speech. “Speech” has been interpreted to include non-verbal expression, so a sculpture — particularly one with a written word or words on it would constitute speech. However, freedom of speech is not absolute.
3. The analysis: The reasoning or an answer to the question.
Since freedom of speech is not absolute and Boffo is erecting large, gruesome statues in his front yard it is likely that the court will rule in favor of the city. This situation is similar to Stoverin in that Boffo’s actions are arguably “bizarre”, his form of speech offensive to community standards, and there are other avenues of communication open to him. Limiting such statues to five feet is arguably a reasonable regulation.
It is here that the implicit assumptions and values of the Justices should be probed, the “rightness” of the decision debated, and the logic of the reasoning considered.Post an analysis that is different from what has been posted and at least a 150-words analysis. Then respond to another student’s posts (that does not have a response) with a 100-word post AND identify a similar rule of law. Citations and similar court cases earn bonus points. Please make your initial post by Wednesday (December 2nd) and give your response to another student’s post by the close of the module.
Writing prompt for main post: The following students with the last name starting with N-R, please conduct an analysis on the following court case:
Roper v. Simmons 543 US 551Respond to this post: Troxel v. Granville 520 US 57
The Issue
This case involves a Washington State statute that allows third parties to petition for visitation rights at any time.
The Law
The Fourteenth Amendment of The United States Constitution protects the fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the custody, care, and control of their children. The Washington State statute that allows third parties to petition for visitation rights at any time therefore violates these rights.
The Analysis
In accordance with the Washington State statute, the grandparents of Troxel’s daughters filed a petition to acquire visitation rights with their grandchildren after Troxel’s death. Following the petition, the Washington Superior Court for Skagit County granted Troxel’s parents (the children’s grandparents) more visitation time than the children’s mother Granville preferred. Granville appealed the Superior Court’s decision to grant the grandparents visitation of one weekend per month, one week every summer, and four hours on each of Troxel’s birthday.
While the appeal was pending, Granville was married and her daughters were adopted by her husband. The Washington Court of Appeals reversed the Washington Superior Court visitation order citing the violation of Granville’s rights under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to raise her children. The court held that the amendment protected a parent’s fundamental rights to made decisions pertaining to the care, custody, and control of their children. Moreover, no court had found the mother to be unfit and thus it was presumed that she acted in the best interest of her children. Additionally, Granville had not sought to end visitations entirely.
The Troxel v. Granville case is similar to the Pierce v. Society of Sisters case in which an Oregon Act requiring parents and guardians to send their children to public school was challenged. The main issue in the case was whether the Act unreasonably interfered with parents’ and guardians’ liberty to direct the upbringing and education of their children. The court ruled that the Origin Act violated the Fourteenth Amendment and that enforcing it would destroy the applellee’s schools.
main post – minimum of 150 words
response post – minimum of 100 words
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!