Capstone Project Change Proposal Benchmark
Order ID | 9973619106 |
Subject | Nursing |
Topic | Capstone Project Change Proposal Benchmark |
Type | Essay |
Writer level | University |
Style | APA |
Sources / references | 0 |
Language | English(U.S.) |
Description / paper instructions Benchmark – Capstone Project Change ProposalIn this assignment, students will pull together the change proposal project components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. At the conclusion of this project, the student will be able to apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice. Students will develop a 1,250-1,500 word paper that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:
Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, PICOT Statement Paper, and Topic 6 assignment, Literature Review. Use the feedback to make appropriate revisions to the portfolio components before submitting. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Falls and Related Injuries Nurses, being the initial contacts for patients in any most health facilities and the fact they interact or engage with patients more when compared to other providers of care constitute a critical component of the healthcare system. Consequently, nurses play a much huge role in making sure that the healthcare system provides not only safe care but also and care of high standard or quality (Sato, Hase, Osaka, Sairyo & Katoh, 2018). However one of the major healthcare or nursing issue over the years is the fall and associated injuries which have proved not only difficult for healthcare providers and facility to manage. The purpose of this essay is to… For instance, and according to DuPree, Fritz-Campiz & Musheno, (2014), Unintentional falls constitute the highest cause of non-fatal injuries among people over 65 years in the US. Moreover, one in every three individuals above 65 years falls at least one time in a given year. In addition, injuries from falls cause the highest number of accidental deaths among people 65-year-old and above (Tricco, Thomas, Veroniki, Hamid, Cogo, Strifler & Riva, 2017). Such statistics coupled with the extent of the costs associated with fall call for proper intervention to reduce falls and their associated injuries. For instance, the government spends billions of dollars on fall and their associated injuries on treating falls. The prevention of fall would provide increased funds for investment in other social programs aimed at improving both healthcare and addressing social or communal problems (Zakrajsek, Schuster, Wells, Williams & Silverchanz, 2018). In addition, falls and their related injuries are responsible for almost 15% of the recorded hospitalization. This increases the burden of healthcare providers especially given the numerous stressors like staff shortage, huge workloads, leadership problems and personal factors among others. An increase in falls and associated injury, therefore, is detrimental to the provision of quality care as captured under the healthy 2020 program goal of reducing deaths that result from falls. Despite this, falls are very complex and difficult to manage or prevent. Given the implications that falls bear on the patients, the healthcare providers and the healthcare system as a whole (Joseph, Henriksen & Malone, 2018), there has been increased There has been an increased research focus towards fall prevention and reduction strategies. As a result, there exist a significant amount of literature regarding the reduction and prevention of falls. However, the literature regarding the topic I inconclusive and hence makes the study both significant and relevant. Given the background to the association between falls, their associated injuries and improved nursing, this study seeks to explore whether indeed whether awareness creation regarding falls and the available strategies can improve the practice of nursing and consequently better healthcare provision and patient outcomes. To achieve this, the study will be developed using the procedures of evidence-based solutions which involve problem identification, data collection, data analysis and report writing. The PICOT question for the study was whether the creating of awareness regarding safety measures, tools and systems and policies among nurses reduces the prevalence of falls and the related injuries. The preceding section provides a breakdown of the components in the PICOT question for the study. P: P or in the population for the study will be nurses I: Intervention– the development and implementation of an awareness program for nurses. C: Comparison- Nurses who do not go through the awareness programs. O: Outcome- Reduced falls, Increased awareness among nurses. T: Time- 6 months In conducting the study, a literature review of available documentation regarding awareness creation and hospital falls was carried out with a focus on obtaining data to answer the PICOT question. To ensure that the information collected was not only valid but also accurate, relevant and reliable all sources selected for the study had to have been peer-reviewed. In addition, the sources had to have been developed recently to provide information that was up to date. Nanah, you described a clinical problem/issue related to nursing practice. You included a PICOT statement developed to address the particular problem with a description of each of the PICOT elements. I noted a few inconsistencies with APA I noted for you. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns! -E Nelson References DuPree, E., Fritz-Campiz, A., & Musheno, D. (2014). A new approach to preventing falls with injuries. Journal of nursing care quality, 29(2), 99-102. Guirguis-Blake, J. M., Michael, Y. L., Perdue, L. A., Coppola, E. L., & Beil, T. L. (2018). Interventions to prevent falls in older adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Jama, 319(16), 1705-1716. Joseph, A., Henriksen, K., & Malone, E. (2018). The architecture of safety: An emerging priority for improving patient safety. Health Affairs, 37(11), 1884-1891. Sato, N., Hase, N., Osaka, A., Sairyo, K., & Katoh, S. (2018). Falls among Hospitalized Patients in an Acute Care Hospital: Analyses of Incident Reports. The Journal of Medical Investigation, 65(1.2), 81-84. Tricco, A. C., Thomas, S. M., Veroniki, A. A., Hamid, J. S., Cogo, E., Strifler, L., … & Riva, J. J. (2017). Comparisons of interventions for preventing falls in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama, 318(17), 1687-1699. Zakrajsek, A., Schuster, E., Wells, C., Williams, J., & Silverchanz, P. (2018). CAREGIVERS OF OLDER ADULTS DURING CARE TRANSITIONS: INSIGHTS INTO POSITIVE ASPECTS OF CAREGIVING. Innovation in Aging, 2(suppl_1), 896-896. Professional Capstone and Practicum
Falls and the injuries that arise from them constitute a huge problem for healthcare providers such as nurses, the affected individuals, communities and the government. This is because not only are falls expensive to manage, but they impose huge financial and non-financial burdens to the healthcare providers and system. This has led to increased focus and research attention towards the best practices of preventing or reducing falls in healthcare facilities generating an increased body of literature regarding the topic and especially focusing on the nurses given the huge role that they play being the primary caregivers. Based on the background, this paper provides a literature review of studies on fall and their related injuries that focus on finding possible interventions to enable nurses to prevent or reduce the prevalence of falls. Comparing research questions In conducting the study, eight peer-reviewed publications and articles were reviewed to provide data regarding the implementation of interventions and strategies aimed at reducing or preventing falls and their associated injury. Most of the studies had huge similarities when it came to the issue of research questions in that they sought to explore the strategies for fall prevention or the factors that are responsible for in-hospital falls. For instance Tricco et al., (2017) in their study Comparisons of interventions for preventing falls in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis provide a detailed exploration of the different strategies and approaches that have been previously used in preventing falls while Natalie Callis, (2016) prevention: Identification of predictive fall risk factors explores the factors that lead to falls within health facilities. For example and according to Natalie Callis, (2016), fall and their associated injuries occur due to insufficient training, poor communication, hospital design, and lack of leadership among others. Subsequently, the construct of the research questions provide a basis for which the association between the topic of falls and their associated injuries and the PICOT question for the study can be drawn. Comparing the sample population Most of the studies selected for the review had been developed through systematic reviews. This implied that the authors adopted a specific, detailed approach to answering specific research questions. In addition, the authors relied on studies regarding the topic for the data used during development. Most of the studies drew data from government and literature sources such as MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Health Management Information Consortium, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Subsequently, the studies were able to capture huge populations from the reviewed studies and their responses towards the issue of fall reduction or prevention and the role that nurses can play in ensuring that falls and their associated injuries are reduced within the hospital facilities. For instance, Tricco, Thomas, Veroniki, Hamid, Cogo, Strifler & Riva, (2017) in their study reviewed 54 publications with a population of 41596 while Cameron, Dyer, Panagoda, Murray, Hill, Cumming & Kerse, (2018) in their study Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities and hospitals Recorded 95 trials and 138,164 participants from their reviews an indication of the extent through which the studies went during data collection. Moreover, the studies were developed through evidence from nurses, government officials, health leaders and the general public to ensure that all stakeholders of the health system were taken into account and to provide valid, accurate and reliable information on the issue of falls as well as the strategies for ensuring that falls are reduced or prevented in line with the health goals that are captured under the Healthy 2020 program. Delete this extra line. You do not need this space between sections. Comparing study limitations The studies used in the development of the paper as shown provide important and comprehensive data can be used in answering the PICOT question. Despite this, the study suffers from the shortcomings of using a literature review as the basis for data collection. For example, the use of a literature review makes it difficult to independently verify the data or findings from other studies. In addition, by reviewing a few studies, the research may leave out very important pieces of information regarding the topic or PICOT question. However, the use of peer-reviewed sources to carry out the research helps to eliminate some of the limitations of the study by ensuring that the data obtained has been thoroughly scrutinized and that the findings are reliable, accurate and valid. Conclusion In conclusion, all studies under review indicated that there exists a huge problem when it comes to the issue of falls and injuries of individuals or patients within a health facility. Regardless there exists a positive association between the training of nurses on injury prevention or reduction and a decline in the number of falls. There is, therefore, a need for additional research to identify both the extrinsic and intrinsic factors that lead to falls, evidence-based practices that can reduce or prevent fall and the role of the caregivers such as nurses in preventing or reducing falls and their associated injuries. Nanah, you appropriately compared the settings, samples, and limitations of your literature. You also included recommendations for future research. There were a few inconsistencies with APA I noted for you. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns! -E Nelson References Callis, N. (2016). Falls prevention: Identification of predictive fall risk factors. Applied Nursing Research, 29, 53-58. Cameron, I. D., Dyer, S. M., Panagoda, C. E., Murray, G. R., Hill, K. D., Cumming, R. G., & Kerse, N. (2018). Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities and hospitals. Cochrane database of systematic reviews, (9). Tricco, A. C., Thomas, S. M., Veroniki, A. A., Hamid, J. S., Cogo, E., Strifler, L., … & Riva, J. J. (2017). Comparisons of interventions for preventing falls in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama, 318(17), 1687-1699.
|
https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | ||||||
NRS-490 | NRS-490-O504 | Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal | 300.0 | ||||||
Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory 0-71% (0.00%) | Less Than Satisfactory 72-75% (75.00%) | Satisfactory 76-79% (79.00%) | Good 80-89% (89.00%) | Excellent 90-100% (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |
Content | 60.0% | ||||||||
Background | 5.0% | Background section is not present. | Background section is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. | Background section is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. | Background section is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. | Background section is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. | |||
Problem Statement | 5.0% | Problem statement is not present. | Problem statement is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. | Problem statement is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. | Problem statement is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. | Problem statement is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. | |||
Change Proposal Purpose | 5.0% | Purpose of change proposal is not present. | Purpose of change proposal is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. | Purpose of change proposal is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. | Purpose of change proposal is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. | Purpose of change proposal is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. | |||
PICOT | 5.0% | PICOT is not present. | PICOT is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. | PICOT is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. | PICOT is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. | PICOT is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. | |||
Literature Search Strategy | 5.0% | Literature search strategy is not present. | Literature search strategy is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. | Literature search strategy is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. | Literature search strategy is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. | Literature search strategy is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. | |||
Literature Evaluation | 5.0% | Literature evaluation is not present. | Literature evaluation is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. | Literature evaluation is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. | Literature evaluation is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. | Literature evaluation is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. | |||
Utilization of Change or Nursing Theory (2.2) | 5.0% | Theory utilization is not present. | Theory utilization content is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. | Theory utilization content is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. | Theory utilization content is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. | Theory utilization content is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. | |||
Proposed Implementation Plan with Outcome Measures (3.2) | 5.0% | Implementation plan is not present. | Implementation plan is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. | Implementation plan is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. | Implementation plan is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. | Implementation plan is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. | |||
Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome (2.3) | 5.0% | Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation and /or discussion component is not present. | Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present, but is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. | Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding. | Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. | Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. | |||
Appendices Inclusive of Practice Immersion Clinical Documentation (1.2) | 5.0% | Appendices are not present. | Appendices are present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail. | Appendices are present with minor elements missing that do not impede understanding. | Appendices are present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required. | Appendices are present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader. | |||
Evidence of Revision | 10.0% | Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques. | Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete. | Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present. | Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided. | Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed. | |||
Organization and Effectiveness | 30.0% | ||||||||
Thesis Development and Purpose | 10.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | |||
Argument Logic and Construction | 10.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | |||
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 10.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |||
Format | 10.0% | ||||||||
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | |||
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |