Order ID | 53563633773 |
Type | Essay |
Writer Level | Masters |
Style | APA |
Sources/References | 4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order | 5-10 Pages |
Business Analytics Course Project
Business, Analytics, Course, Project
Stage 3: Requirements
Before you begin work on this assignment, be sure you have read the Case Study and
reviewed the feedback received on your Stage 1 and 2 assignments.
Overview
As the business analyst in the CIO's department of Maryland Technology Consulting
(MTC), your next task in developing your Business Analysis and System
Recommendation (BA&SR) Report is to develop a set of requirements for the hiring
system.
Assignment – BA&SR Section III. Requirements
The first step is to review any feedback from previous stages to help improve the
effectiveness of your overall report and then add the new section to your report. Only
content for Stage 3 will be graded for this submission. Part of the grading criteria for
Stage 4 includes evaluating if the document is a very effective and cohesive
assemblage of the four sections, is well formatted and flows smoothly from one section
to the next.
For this assignment, you will add Section III of the Business Analysis and System
Recommendation (BA&SR) Report to your Sections I and II. In this section you will
identify requirements for the new hiring system. This analysis leads into Section IV.
System Recommendation of the BA&SR (Stage 4 assignment) that will analyze a
proposed IT solution to ensure it meets MTC's organizational strategy and fulfills its
operational needs.
Using the case study, assignment instructions, Content readings, and external research,
develop your Section III. Requirements. The case study tells you that the executives
and employees at Maryland Technology Consultants (MTC) have identified a need for
an effective and efficient applicant tracking or hiring system. As you review the case
study, use the assignment instructions to take notes to assist in your analysis. In
particular, look for information in the interviews to provide stakeholder interests and
needs.
Use the outline format, headings and tables provided and follow all formatting
instructions below.
III. Requirements
A. Stakeholder Interests – Review the interest or objectives for the new hiring system for
each stakeholder listed below based on his or her organizational role and case study
information. Consider how the technology will improve how his/her job is done; that is,
identify what each of the stakeholders needs the hiring system to do.
Then to complete the table below, use information from the stakeholder interviews and
identify one significant challenge or problem for each stakeholder related to the current
hiring process (not their future expectations). Then explain how a system could address
their problems. Do not define what that position does in the organization. (Provide an
introductory sentence for this section, copy the table below and complete the two
columns with 1-2 complete sentences for each role in each column.)
Role
Specific problem
related to the
current hiring
process
How a technology solution to
support the hiring process
could address the problem
1. CEO
2. CFO
3. CIO
4. Director of Human Resources
5. Manager of Recruiting
6. Recruiters
7. Administrative Assistant
8. Hiring Manager (Functional
supervisor the new employee
would be working for.)
B. Defining Requirements – The next step is to identify the essential requirements for
the information system. In addition to the stakeholder interests identified above, review
the Case Study, especially the interviews, highlighting any statements that tell what the
person expects or needs the system to do. User requirements express
specifically what the user needs the system to do. This can be in terms of tasks the
users need to perform, data they need to input, what the system might do with that data
input, and output required.
System performance requirements express how the system will perform in several
performance areas and security. As a member of the CIO's organization, you will use
your professional knowledge to Identify 5 User Requirements (including one specifically
related to reporting) and 5 System Performance Requirements (including 2 security-
related requirements). Refer to Week 5 content on requirements; security requirements
are covered in Week 6. Additional research can expand your knowledge of these areas.
Once you have identified the 10 requirements, evaluate each one using the criteria
below and create 10 well-written requirements statements for the new hiring system.
The requirement statement:
· Is a complete sentence, with a subject (system) and predicate (intended result, action
or condition).
· Identifies only one requirement; does not include the words "and," "also," "with," and
"or."
· For User Requirements, states what tasks the system will support or perform.
· For System Performance Requirements, states how the system will perform.
· Includes a measure or metric that can be used to determine whether the requirement
is met (time or quantity), where appropriate.
· Is stated in positive terms and uses "must" (not "shall," "may" or "should"); "the system
must xxxx" not "the system must not xxx".
· Avoids the use of terms that cannot be defined and measured, such as
"approximately," "robust," "user friendly," etc.
· Is achievable and realistic; avoids terms such as "100% uptime," or "no failures".
For a full requirements document, there will be many requirement statements; you only
need to provide the number of requirements identified for each category. Do not provide
generic statements but relate to the needs of MTC to improve its hiring process.
(Provide an introductory sentence, copy the table, and complete the Requirements
Statement and Stakeholder columns. No additional information should be entered into
the first column, Requirement ID.)
Requirem
ent ID# Requirement Statement Stakeholder
only (Position and Name
from Case Study that
identified this
requirement)
User Requirements – (What the user needs the
system to do)
EXAMPLE
The system must store all information from the
candidate’s application/resume in a central applicant
database. EXAMPLE PROVIDED – (Retain text but
remove this label and gray shading in your report)
Recruiter – Peter
O’Neil
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. (Reporting-Output of organized information retrieved
from the system—replace this statement with a
specific reporting requirement)
System Performance Requirements – (How the
system will perform)
EXAMPLE
The system must be implemented as a Software as a
Service solution. EXAMPLE PROVIDED – (Retain
text but remove this label and gray shading in your
report)
CIO – Raj Patel
6.
7.
8.
9. (Security-replace this with a specific security
requirement)
10. (Security-replace this with a specific security
requirement)
Formatting Your Assignment
Consider your audience – you are writing in the role of an MTC business analyst and
your audience is MTC and your boss, the CIO. Don’t discuss MTC as if the reader has
no knowledge of the organization. Use third person consistently throughout the report.
In third person, the writer avoids the pronouns I, we, my, and ours.
The third person is used to make the writing more objective by taking the individual, the
“self,” out of the writing. This method is very helpful for effective business writing, a form
in which facts, not opinion, drive the tone of the text. Writing in the third person allows
the writer to come across as unbiased and thus more informed.
· In Stage 3, you are preparing the third part of a 4-stage report. Use the structure,
headings, and outline format provided here for your report. Use the numbering/lettering
in the assignment instructions as shown below.
III. Requirements
A. Stakeholder Interests
B. Defining Requirements
· Begin with Sections I and II, considering any feedback received, and add to it Section
III.
· Write a short concise paper: Use the recommendations provided in each area
for length of response. It’s important to value quality over quantity. Section III should not
exceed 3 pages.
· Content areas should be double spaced; table entries should be single-spaced.
· To copy a table: Move your cursor to the table, then click on the small box that
appears at the upper left corner of the table to highlight the table; right click and COPY
the table; put the cursor in your paper where you want the table and right click and
PASTE the table.
· Ensure that each of the tables is preceded by an introductory sentence that explains
what is contained in the table, so the reader understands why the table has been
included.
· Continue to use the title page created in Stage 1 that includes: The title of report,
company name, your name, Course and Section Number, and date of this submission.
· Use at least two resources with APA formatted citation and reference for this Stage 3
assignment. Use at least one external reference and one from the course content.
Course content should be from the class reading content, not the assignment
instructions or case study itself. For information on APA format, refer to Content>Course
Resources>Writing Resources.
· Add the references required for this assignment to the Reference Page. Additional
research in the next stage will be added to this as you build the report. The final
document should contain all references from all stages appropriately formatted and
alphabetized.
· Running headers are not required for this report.
· Compare your work to the Grading Rubric below to be sure you have met content and
quality criteria.
· Submit your paper as a Word document, or a document that can be read in Word.
Keep tables in Word format – do not paste in graphics.
· Your submission should include your last name first in the
filename: Lastname_firstname_Stage_3
GRADING RUBRIC:
Criteria
90-100%
Far Above
Standards
80-89%
Above
Standards
70-79%
Meets
Standards
60-69%
Below
Standards
< 60%
Well Below
Standards
Possi
ble
Point
s
Stakeholder
Interests
Identificatio
n of specific
stakeholder
problems
(interests
and
objectives
for
improving
the hiring
process)
and how a
technology
system
could
address.
Generally,
0-3 points
per role.
Both
quantity and
quality
evaluated.
22-24 Points
Problems
and how a
technology
solution will
address are
correctly and
clearly
described
and fully
explained
using a
sophisticated
level of
writing.
20-21
Points
Problems
and how a
technology
solution will
address are
clearly
described
and
explained
using an
effective
level of
writing.
17-19
Points
Problems
and how a
technology
solution will
address are
described
and
explained.
15-16
Points
Problems
and how a
technology
solution will
address are
not clearly
described
and
explained;
and/or lacks
effective
presentation
of
information
0-14 Points
Content
missing or
extremely
incomplete,
did not reflect
the
assignment
instructions,
showed little
or no
originality,
demonstrated
little effort, is
not supported
with
information
from the Case
Study; and/or
is not original
work for this
class section.
24
User
Requiremen
ts
5 user
requirement
s (1
addresses
reporting)
23-25 Points
Correctly
identified,
written and
sourced;
clearly
derived from
the Case
Study;
20-22
Points
Identified,
written and
sourced
correctly;
requirement
s are
derived from
17-19
Points
Identified
and
sourced;
requiremen
ts are
related to
the Case
15-16
Points
Fewer than
5
requirement
s are
identified
and
sourced;
0-14 Points
Content
missing or
extremely
incomplete,
did not reflect
the
assignment
instructions,
25
Generally,
0-5 points
each. Both
quantity and
quality
evaluated.
demonstrate
s
sophisticated
analysis.
the Case
Study;
demonstrate
s effective
analysis.
Study. and/or
information
provided is
not correct;
and/or
requirement
s are not all
related to
the Case
Study.
showed little
or no
originality,
demonstrated
little effort, is
not supported
with
information
from the Case
Study; and/or
is not original
work for this
class section.
Performanc
e
Requiremen
ts
3
performanc
e
requirement
s and 2
system
security
requirement
s
Generally,
0-5 points
each. Both
quantity and
quality
evaluated.
23-25 Points
Correctly
identified,
written and
sourced;
clearly
derived from
the Case
Study;
demonstrate
s
sophisticated
analysis.
20-22
Points
Identified,
written and
sourced
correctly;
requirement
s are
derived from
the Case
Study;
demonstrate
s effective
analysis.
17-19
Points
Identified
and
sourced;
requiremen
ts are
related to
the Case
Study.
15-16
Points
Fewer than
5
requirement
s are
identified
and
sourced;
and/or
information
provided is
not correct;
and/or
requirement
s are not all
related to
the Case
Study.
0-14 Points
Content
missing or
extremely
incomplete,
did not reflect
the
assignment
instructions,
showed little
or no
originality,
demonstrated
little effort, is
not supported
with
information
from the Case
Study; and/or
is not original
work for this
class section.
25
Research
Two or
more source
s–one
source from
within the
IFSM 300
course
content and
one external
(other than
the course
materials)
9-10 Points
Required
resources
are
incorporated
and used
effectively.
Sources
used are
relevant and
timely and
contribute
strongly to
the analysis.
References
are
appropriately
incorporated
and cited
using APA
style.
8.5 Points
At least two
sources are
incorporated
and are
relevant and
somewhat
support the
analysis.
References
are
appropriatel
y
incorporated
and cited
using APA
style.
7.5 Points
Only one
resource is
used and
properly
incorporate
d and/or
reference(s
) lack
correct
APA style.
6.5 Points
A source
may be
used, but is
not properly
incorporate
d or used,
and/or is not
effective or
appropriate;
and/or does
not follow
APA style
for
references
and
citations.
0-5 Points
No course
content or
external
research
incorporated;
or reference
listed is not
cited within
the text.
10
Format
Uses outline
format
provided;
includes
Title Page
and
Reference
Page
14-16 Points
Very well
organized
and easy to
read. Very
few or no
errors in
sentence
structure,
grammar,
and spelling;
double-
spaced,
written in
third person
and
presented in
12-13
Points
Effective
organization
; has few
errors in
sentence
structure,
grammar,
and
spelling;
double-
spaced,
written in
third person
and
presented in
11 Points
Some
organizatio
n; may
have some
errors in
sentence
structure,
grammar
and
spelling.
Report is
double
spaced and
written in
third
person.
10 Points
Not well
organized,
and/or
contains
several
grammars
and/or
spelling
errors;
and/or is not
double-
spaced and
written in
third
person.
0-9 Points
Extremely
poorly written,
has many
grammars
and/or spelling
errors, or does
not convey the
information.
16
a
professional
format.
a
professional
format.
TOTAL Points
Possible 100
15
Business Analytics Course Project
Business, Analytics, Course, Project
Stage 3: Requirements
Before you begin work on this assignment, be sure you have read the Case Study and
reviewed the feedback received on your Stage 1 and 2 assignments.
Overview
As the business analyst in the CIO's department of Maryland Technology Consulting
(MTC), your next task in developing your Business Analysis and System
Recommendation (BA&SR) Report is to develop a set of requirements for the hiring
system.
Assignment – BA&SR Section III. Requirements
The first step is to review any feedback from previous stages to help improve the
effectiveness of your overall report and then add the new section to your report. Only
content for Stage 3 will be graded for this submission. Part of the grading criteria for
Stage 4 includes evaluating if the document is a very effective and cohesive
assemblage of the four sections, is well formatted and flows smoothly from one section
to the next.
For this assignment, you will add Section III of the Business Analysis and System
Recommendation (BA&SR) Report to your Sections I and II. In this section you will
identify requirements for the new hiring system. This analysis leads into Section IV.
System Recommendation of the BA&SR (Stage 4 assignment) that will analyze a
proposed IT solution to ensure it meets MTC's organizational strategy and fulfills its
operational needs.
Using the case study, assignment instructions, Content readings, and external research,
develop your Section III. Requirements. The case study tells you that the executives
and employees at Maryland Technology Consultants (MTC) have identified a need for
an effective and efficient applicant tracking or hiring system. As you review the case
study, use the assignment instructions to take notes to assist in your analysis. In
particular, look for information in the interviews to provide stakeholder interests and
needs.
Use the outline format, headings and tables provided and follow all formatting
instructions below.
III. Requirements
A. Stakeholder Interests – Review the interest or objectives for the new hiring system for
each stakeholder listed below based on his or her organizational role and case study
information. Consider how the technology will improve how his/her job is done; that is,
identify what each of the stakeholders needs the hiring system to do.
Then to complete the table below, use information from the stakeholder interviews and
identify one significant challenge or problem for each stakeholder related to the current
hiring process (not their future expectations). Then explain how a system could address
their problems. Do not define what that position does in the organization. (Provide an
introductory sentence for this section, copy the table below and complete the two
columns with 1-2 complete sentences for each role in each column.)
Role
Specific problem
related to the
current hiring
process
How a technology solution to
support the hiring process
could address the problem
1. CEO
2. CFO
3. CIO
4. Director of Human Resources
5. Manager of Recruiting
6. Recruiters
7. Administrative Assistant
8. Hiring Manager (Functional
supervisor the new employee
would be working for.)
B. Defining Requirements – The next step is to identify the essential requirements for
the information system. In addition to the stakeholder interests identified above, review
the Case Study, especially the interviews, highlighting any statements that tell what the
person expects or needs the system to do. User requirements express
specifically what the user needs the system to do. This can be in terms of tasks the
users need to perform, data they need to input, what the system might do with that data
input, and output required.
System performance requirements express how the system will perform in several
performance areas and security. As a member of the CIO's organization, you will use
your professional knowledge to Identify 5 User Requirements (including one specifically
related to reporting) and 5 System Performance Requirements (including 2 security-
related requirements). Refer to Week 5 content on requirements; security requirements
are covered in Week 6. Additional research can expand your knowledge of these areas.
Once you have identified the 10 requirements, evaluate each one using the criteria
below and create 10 well-written requirements statements for the new hiring system.
The requirement statement:
· Is a complete sentence, with a subject (system) and predicate (intended result, action
or condition).
· Identifies only one requirement; does not include the words "and," "also," "with," and
"or."
· For User Requirements, states what tasks the system will support or perform.
· For System Performance Requirements, states how the system will perform.
· Includes a measure or metric that can be used to determine whether the requirement
is met (time or quantity), where appropriate.
· Is stated in positive terms and uses "must" (not "shall," "may" or "should"); "the system
must xxxx" not "the system must not xxx".
· Avoids the use of terms that cannot be defined and measured, such as
"approximately," "robust," "user friendly," etc.
· Is achievable and realistic; avoids terms such as "100% uptime," or "no failures".
For a full requirements document, there will be many requirement statements; you only
need to provide the number of requirements identified for each category. Do not provide
generic statements but relate to the needs of MTC to improve its hiring process.
(Provide an introductory sentence, copy the table, and complete the Requirements
Statement and Stakeholder columns. No additional information should be entered into
the first column, Requirement ID.)
Requirem
ent ID# Requirement Statement Stakeholder
only (Position and Name
from Case Study that
identified this
requirement)
User Requirements – (What the user needs the
system to do)
EXAMPLE
The system must store all information from the
candidate’s application/resume in a central applicant
database. EXAMPLE PROVIDED – (Retain text but
remove this label and gray shading in your report)
Recruiter – Peter
O’Neil
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. (Reporting-Output of organized information retrieved
from the system—replace this statement with a
specific reporting requirement)
System Performance Requirements – (How the
system will perform)
EXAMPLE
The system must be implemented as a Software as a
Service solution. EXAMPLE PROVIDED – (Retain
text but remove this label and gray shading in your
report)
CIO – Raj Patel
6.
7.
8.
9. (Security-replace this with a specific security
requirement)
10. (Security-replace this with a specific security
requirement)
Formatting Your Assignment
Consider your audience – you are writing in the role of an MTC business analyst and
your audience is MTC and your boss, the CIO. Don’t discuss MTC as if the reader has
no knowledge of the organization. Use third person consistently throughout the report.
In third person, the writer avoids the pronouns I, we, my, and ours.
The third person is used to make the writing more objective by taking the individual, the
“self,” out of the writing. This method is very helpful for effective business writing, a form
in which facts, not opinion, drive the tone of the text. Writing in the third person allows
the writer to come across as unbiased and thus more informed.
· In Stage 3, you are preparing the third part of a 4-stage report. Use the structure,
headings, and outline format provided here for your report. Use the numbering/lettering
in the assignment instructions as shown below.
III. Requirements
A. Stakeholder Interests
B. Defining Requirements
· Begin with Sections I and II, considering any feedback received, and add to it Section
III.
· Write a short concise paper: Use the recommendations provided in each area
for length of response. It’s important to value quality over quantity. Section III should not
exceed 3 pages.
· Content areas should be double spaced; table entries should be single-spaced.
· To copy a table: Move your cursor to the table, then click on the small box that
appears at the upper left corner of the table to highlight the table; right click and COPY
the table; put the cursor in your paper where you want the table and right click and
PASTE the table.
· Ensure that each of the tables is preceded by an introductory sentence that explains
what is contained in the table, so the reader understands why the table has been
included.
· Continue to use the title page created in Stage 1 that includes: The title of report,
company name, your name, Course and Section Number, and date of this submission.
· Use at least two resources with APA formatted citation and reference for this Stage 3
assignment. Use at least one external reference and one from the course content.
Course content should be from the class reading content, not the assignment
instructions or case study itself. For information on APA format, refer to Content>Course
Resources>Writing Resources.
· Add the references required for this assignment to the Reference Page. Additional
research in the next stage will be added to this as you build the report. The final
document should contain all references from all stages appropriately formatted and
alphabetized.
· Running headers are not required for this report.
· Compare your work to the Grading Rubric below to be sure you have met content and
quality criteria.
· Submit your paper as a Word document, or a document that can be read in Word.
Keep tables in Word format – do not paste in graphics.
· Your submission should include your last name first in the
filename: Lastname_firstname_Stage_3
GRADING RUBRIC:
Criteria
90-100%
Far Above
Standards
80-89%
Above
Standards
70-79%
Meets
Standards
60-69%
Below
Standards
< 60%
Well Below
Standards
Possi
ble
Point
s
Stakeholder
Interests
Identificatio
n of specific
stakeholder
problems
(interests
and
objectives
for
improving
the hiring
process)
and how a
technology
system
could
address.
Generally,
0-3 points
per role.
Both
quantity and
quality
evaluated.
22-24 Points
Problems
and how a
technology
solution will
address are
correctly and
clearly
described
and fully
explained
using a
sophisticated
level of
writing.
20-21
Points
Problems
and how a
technology
solution will
address are
clearly
described
and
explained
using an
effective
level of
writing.
17-19
Points
Problems
and how a
technology
solution will
address are
described
and
explained.
15-16
Points
Problems
and how a
technology
solution will
address are
not clearly
described
and
explained;
and/or lacks
effective
presentation
of
information
0-14 Points
Content
missing or
extremely
incomplete,
did not reflect
the
assignment
instructions,
showed little
or no
originality,
demonstrated
little effort, is
not supported
with
information
from the Case
Study; and/or
is not original
work for this
class section.
24
User
Requiremen
ts
5 user
requirement
s (1
addresses
reporting)
23-25 Points
Correctly
identified,
written and
sourced;
clearly
derived from
the Case
Study;
20-22
Points
Identified,
written and
sourced
correctly;
requirement
s are
derived from
17-19
Points
Identified
and
sourced;
requiremen
ts are
related to
the Case
15-16
Points
Fewer than
5
requirement
s are
identified
and
sourced;
0-14 Points
Content
missing or
extremely
incomplete,
did not reflect
the
assignment
instructions,
25
Generally,
0-5 points
each. Both
quantity and
quality
evaluated.
demonstrate
s
sophisticated
analysis.
the Case
Study;
demonstrate
s effective
analysis.
Study. and/or
information
provided is
not correct;
and/or
requirement
s are not all
related to
the Case
Study.
showed little
or no
originality,
demonstrated
little effort, is
not supported
with
information
from the Case
Study; and/or
is not original
work for this
class section.
Performanc
e
Requiremen
ts
3
performanc
e
requirement
s and 2
system
security
requirement
s
Generally,
0-5 points
each. Both
quantity and
quality
evaluated.
23-25 Points
Correctly
identified,
written and
sourced;
clearly
derived from
the Case
Study;
demonstrate
s
sophisticated
analysis.
20-22
Points
Identified,
written and
sourced
correctly;
requirement
s are
derived from
the Case
Study;
demonstrate
s effective
analysis.
17-19
Points
Identified
and
sourced;
requiremen
ts are
related to
the Case
Study.
15-16
Points
Fewer than
5
requirement
s are
identified
and
sourced;
and/or
information
provided is
not correct;
and/or
requirement
s are not all
related to
the Case
Study.
0-14 Points
Content
missing or
extremely
incomplete,
did not reflect
the
assignment
instructions,
showed little
or no
originality,
demonstrated
little effort, is
not supported
with
information
from the Case
Study; and/or
is not original
work for this
class section.
25
Research
Two or
more source
s–one
source from
within the
IFSM 300
course
content and
one external
(other than
the course
materials)
9-10 Points
Required
resources
are
incorporated
and used
effectively.
Sources
used are
relevant and
timely and
contribute
strongly to
the analysis.
References
are
appropriately
incorporated
and cited
using APA
style.
8.5 Points
At least two
sources are
incorporated
and are
relevant and
somewhat
support the
analysis.
References
are
appropriatel
y
incorporated
and cited
using APA
style.
7.5 Points
Only one
resource is
used and
properly
incorporate
d and/or
reference(s
) lack
correct
APA style.
6.5 Points
A source
may be
used, but is
not properly
incorporate
d or used,
and/or is not
effective or
appropriate;
and/or does
not follow
APA style
for
references
and
citations.
0-5 Points
No course
content or
external
research
incorporated;
or reference
listed is not
cited within
the text.
10
Format
Uses outline
format
provided;
includes
Title Page
and
Reference
Page
14-16 Points
Very well
organized
and easy to
read. Very
few or no
errors in
sentence
structure,
grammar,
and spelling;
double-
spaced,
written in
third person
and
presented in
12-13
Points
Effective
organization
; has few
errors in
sentence
structure,
grammar,
and
spelling;
double-
spaced,
written in
third person
and
presented in
11 Points
Some
organizatio
n; may
have some
errors in
sentence
structure,
grammar
and
spelling.
Report is
double
spaced and
written in
third
person.
10 Points
Not well
organized,
and/or
contains
several
grammars
and/or
spelling
errors;
and/or is not
double-
spaced and
written in
third
person.
0-9 Points
Extremely
poorly written,
has many
grammars
and/or spelling
errors, or does
not convey the
information.
16
a
professional
format.
a
professional
format.
TOTAL Points
Possible 100
15
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDERCLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernowAlso, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|