BUSI 600 Business Case Study
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
BUSI 600 Business Case Study
BUSI 600, Business, Case, Study
For each Case Study Assignment, you will read the assigned case study and analyze the case scenario/research through a series of questions. The overall structure of each case is similar in that each case begins with an abstract followed by a description of the scenario/research and concludes with a discussion about the situation. The discussion is simply a series of unique questions about the case scenario that you will answer as your Case Study Assignment.
No abstract is required for the Case Study Assignment nor are an introduction or conclusion; simply type the questions as an APA style heading and respond. Ensure the following are met:
- Must be supported with at least 4 scholarly (peer reviewed) research articles in your response.
- Must be at least 900 words (the word count does not include the question text, cover page, or reference page)
- Use proper grammar, current APA format and submit in MS Word format
The cases can be found in McGraw Hill Connect or as documents in the Resources section.
The questions for each Case Study Assignment can be found in McGraw Hill Connect as follows:
- Hero Builder’s Case Study Assignment: see case page 2
Criteria Ratings Points
Content – Case Analysis
24 to >22.0 pts
Advanced
Insightful throughout. Completely developed all relevant information. Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were clearly identified, analyzed, and supported.
22 to >18.0 pts
Proficient
Specific, solid. Less carefully developed. Some insights. Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were partially identified, analyzed, and supported.
18 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Vague, obvious, underdeveloped, or too broad. One or more main issues not identified. Limited evidence of critical thinking. Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were not clearly identified, analyzed, and supported.
0 pts
Not Present
24 pts
Content – Synthesis of course theories/ concepts and case analysis
24 to >22.0 pts
Advanced
Convincingly interpreted and linked to course theories/ concepts. Considers context and limits of position where appropriate. Key points were clearly identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case.
22 to >18.0 pts
Proficient
Relevant. Appropriately interpreted and linked to main course theories/concepts. Key points were partially identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case.
18 to >0.0 pts
Developing
A few generalized connections made to course theories/concepts. Connections not clearly linked to case. Key points were not identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case.
0 pts
Not Present
24 pts
Content – Application of Scholarly Research
22 to >20.0 pts
Advanced
Author accurately applied 4 or more scholarly (peer reviewed) sources.
20 to >18.0 pts
Proficient
Author accurately applied at least 3 scholarly (peer reviewed) sources.
18 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Author accurately applied 1 or 2 scholarly (peer reviewed) sources.
0 pts
Not Present
22 pts
Structure – Mechanics
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
Correct spelling and grammar are used throughout the essay. There are 0–1 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Specific, solid. Less carefully developed. Some insights. Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were partially identified, analyzed, and supported.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
There are more than 3 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Case Study Grading Rubric | BUSI600_C01_202140
Criteria Ratings Points
Structure – APA Style
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
There are 0–1 minor errors in APA format in the required items: title page, running head, font type and size, line spacing, headings, citations, and references.
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
There are 2–3 minor errors in APA format in the required items.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
There are more than 3 errors in APA format in the required items.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Structure – Word Count
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
The minimum word count 900 words is met. Excluding the cover page and References page(s).
8 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
The word count of at least 800 words is met. Excluding the cover page and References page(s).
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The word count of 500–799 words. Excluding the cover page and References page(s).
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Total Points: 100
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!