BSBPMG536 Performance and Skills Assessment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
BSBPMG536 Performance and Skills Assessment
BSBPMG536
Manage project risk
Task 2 – Performance and Skills Assessment Task summary This project assessment task requires you to manage project risk on 2 occasions for a project of sufficient complexity in an organisation (real or simulated).
This assessment is divided into 4 (four) parts:
Part A: Identify and analyse project risks
Part B: Establish risk treatments and controls
Part C: Monitor and control project risks
Part D: Assess risk management outcomes
You will complete the assessment tasks in a real organisation (your current workplace can be used). If you are not working, select a workplace / organisation you are familiar with.
Required
You are required to demonstrate your ability to:
· Manage project risk on at least two occasions.
· Conduct effective risk management processes for a project of sufficient complexity.
· Apply risk management techniques, strategies and tools.
Timing
1. You may review this assessment task at the commencement of your unit.
2. You may start this assessment in the first week of the term
3. The due date of this assessment via Canvas and you must submit by the due date.
Note: Failure to submit by the actual due date, will be marked as “Late” and recorded as an NYS.
Submit
This completed workbook and the report you prepare on a Powerpoint presentation (answers to Parts A-D to be included in 1 (one) PowerPoint presentation).
Use the templates provided by us in this assessment tool.
Assessment criteria
For your performance to be deemed satisfactory in this assessment task, you must satisfactorily address all the assessment criteria. If part of this task is not satisfactorily completed, you will be asked to complete further assessment to demonstrate competence.
Re-submission opportunities
You will be provided feedback on your performance by the Assessor. The feedback will indicate if you have satisfactorily addressed the requirements of each part of this task.
If any parts of the task are not satisfactorily completed, the assessor will explain why, and provide you written feedback along with guidance on what you must undertake to demonstrate satisfactory performance. Re-assessment attempt(s) will be arranged at a later time and date.
You have the right to appeal the outcome of assessment decisions if you feel that you have been dealt with unfairly or have other appropriate grounds for an appeal.
You are encouraged to consult with the assessor prior to attempting this task if you do not understand any part of this task or if you have any learning issues or needs that may hinder you when attempting any part of the assessment.
Assessment Cover Sheet Student name: Student ID Trainer’s Name: Date Submitted: Student declaration: I declare that: · I have read and understood all the information provided in relation to the assessment requirements to complete this unit, the instructions and the purpose and processes of undertaking this assessment task
· This assessment is my own work and where other’s works or ideas have been used, I have appropriately referenced or acknowledged them
· I understand that plagiarism is a serious offence that may lead to disciplinary action.
Student signature: Task 2 – Performance and Skills Assessment
You are required to select an organisation in order to complete this assessment. An organisation can be a business, charity, association, not-for-profit enterprise or government body.
You may also select your own organisation (for example, your own business or one you plan to start); an organisation you have access to, such as a business owned by a friend or family; or your current employer.
Alternatively, you can use the case study, namely the IAJ CRM project, with supporting information provided together with Task 2. This includes the following documents, which will provide the information you need to address all the questions in this assessment:
- IAJ Company Profile
- IAJ CRM Project Brief
- IAJ Risk Management Framework
Part A: Identify and analyse project risks
This task will require you to identify and analyse 2 project risks for a project of sufficient complexity at
your chosen organisation / workplace. If in doubt regarding project complexity, discuss the project you have chosen to focus on with your trainer. Complete the following:
- Indicate how you will liaise with relevant stakeholders to identify risk objectives, project risk context and project risks. Complete the stakeholder engagement plan below to indicate how communicated with stakeholders and the outcome of the consultation:
Name of stakeholder Title of stakeholder Method of communication Frequency Type of information needed Outcome of consultation
- Conduct a SWOT analysis on the project, to help identify potential Weaknesses and Threats which could place the project at risk of not meeting its objectives. Also identify possible Strengths and Opportunities that could assist the project in achieving its objectives and overcoming the weaknesses and threats that were identified . Use the template below, also taking into consideration the feedback provided to you by the stakeholders.
Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats
- Identify risk priorities in agreement with relevant stakeholders. Use the template below:
Risk Priority Ranking
- a) Document risk analysis outcomes in a risk register. Use the template below and identify at least three (3) risks:
Risk ID Risk description Risk likelihood Risk consequence Risk Rating Risk mitigation Risk Owner 1 2 3 4 b). You are required to distribute information gathered in this task to relevant stakeholders in your chosen organisation and request their feedback. Summarise all relevant information from points 1-4 above for each of the risks you identified and send an email to the relevant Stakeholders. Use the template below to answer this question.
To: Cc: Subject: Part B: Establish risk treatments and controls
This task will require you identify risk controls and establish risk treatments for the risks listed in part A.
- What risk controls does your chosen organisation have in place to reduce the likelihood or impact of those risks you identified in part A?
- a) Analyse and record risk treatment options for at least two (2) of the identified risks using the templates below.
Risk ID 1: Risk description: Predicted impact: Response recommendation: Proposed actions: Resources required: Person(s) responsible: Response schedule: Reporting/monitoring requirements: Project manager Name ……………………………………….. Date: ……………………….. Signature ……………………………..
Authorisation Name ………………………………………… Date: ……………………….. Signature ……………………………..
Risk ID 2: Risk description: Predicted impact: Response recommendation: Proposed actions: Resources required: Person(s) responsible: Response schedule: Reporting/monitoring requirements: Project manager Name ……………………………………….. Date: ……………………….. Signature ……………………………..
Authorisation Name ………………………………………… Date: ……………………….. Signature ……………………………..
2 b) After completing this task, send another email to the project stakeholders highlighting the response recommendations that were identified and the proposed actions. Make sure to thank the stakeholders for their input in identifying risks and response recommendations.
To: Cc: Subject: Part C: Monitor and control project risks
This task will require you to monitor risk environment, identify changed circumstances and evaluate risk responses following a risk review process for the risks identified in part A. Use the template below:
Risk ID: Identify at least one Environmental changes or Risk Category. Also include one Method of detection that indicates how you will monitor environmental changes. Risk response – assume that there was an environmental change. Indicate what type of response will you put in place. Recovery status – indicate whether the risk response was effective: Lessons learned – indicate what limitations you identified in the risk monitoring process Preventative measures – Indicate how you will address the limitations you identified. Part D: Assess risk management outcomes
This task will require you to assess risk management outcomes for each of the risks identified in part A. To do so, refer to the risk treatments you identified in part B and risk review process in part C for your chosen organisation. Then, determine the effectiveness of the risk management processes and procedures by answering these questions:
· How effective were the processes that you used? · Were the processes in line with the project outcomes and objectives? · Did any of the risk mitigation processes improve the project outcomes? Explain your answer. · Did any of the risk mitigation processes negatively impact project outcomes? · What recommended improvements do you propose for application in future projects? After completing this task, document risk management issues and recommended improvements for application to future on a PPT. Imagine you will present this PPT to relevant stakeholders at your chosen organisation when organising the information.
Congratulations on completing your assessment. Please remember to submit:
- This completed workbook and,
- The report you prepare on a PowerPoint presentation
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!