Book Review of Ginzburg’s Cheese and the Worms
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Book Review of Ginzburg’s Cheese and the Worms
Subject: Other
Topic: Book Review of Ginzburg’s Cheese and the Worms
Paper details:
The paper needs to be 5 pages (5 means 5 full pages of text, excluding your title & name, etc.) 5 points will be deducted for every half page under the minimum 5-page requirement. They should be 12 Times New Roman Font/Double-Spaced with one-inch margins; 10 Times New Roman Font/Double-Spaced in footnotes Format the paper using Chicago-Style formatting and footnotes Chicago and Turabian Writing/Documentation (Links to an external site.) Chicago Manual of Style Online (Links to an external site.) Chicago Manual of Style Quick Guide (Links to an external site.) Purdue Online Writing Lab (Links to an external site.) Late book reviews will lose one letter grade for every day that they are late (but please communicate with me if you have a legitimate reason for handing in a paper late). In the book review, you should focus on the book’s historical argument and how effectively the author used evidence to support the argument. The idea of a book review is not to repeat what the book says or describe it–that is a “book report.” Rather, a review analyzes the book and critiques it by examining the thesis and arguments. Though you may briefly summarize the book’s contents, the book review should do much more than recap the book. You should focus on the book’s historical argument, use of evidence, contribution to the field, readability for its intended audience, and general usefulness. Read some sample reviews in the Troy University Library Database to get an idea of how this is done. Read with a purpose. Here is a secret: you don’t have to read every word slowly and carefully. Preview the book by reading the Prefaces and skimming the chapter. Read a chapter at a time, focusing on arguments, not data. You might want to read the beginning and end of each chapter first to understand the main idea and then locate the sub arguments in the chapter. Do not take copious notes. Rather, read to the end of the chapter, keeping your main questions in mind, and then write a brief summary or set of notes after you have finished a chapter. These are the questions you can ask as you read the book and write your review (but this not a template for the book review): What is the purpose and thesis of the book? Look at the Preface or Introduction to find out what the author set out to do and why. How does the author make the argument? What is the author’s methodology? You should give a brief but thorough overview of the book’s argument, but DO NOT summarize the contents. What are the themes of the book? Look at the Table of Contents as well as the Introductory material to find out what key ideas and issues the author addresses. What is the author’s point of view? Is there an unstated bias, or does the author clearly define the point of view or approach the book will take? Examine the thesis and arguments, as well as the handling of evidence, to see what that approach is. Here you also should consider the author’s credentials. What sources does the author use and how effectively does the book use evidence to support arguments, and how does the author address counterevidence? Look particularly for primary source and archeological evidence. Who is the audience and how well does the author write in a style and with an organization that speaks to that audience? What structure, organization, and supporting aids does the book have that make it effective? Look at notes, bibliography, maps, charts, diagrams, etc. In general, what are the major strengths and weaknesses of the book and its argument? Is the argument convincing and do the sources support the argument? How does it contribute to our knowledge of the period/topic, especially the Protestant and Catholic Reformations and the impact of the reformations on people, etc.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!