bone of contention between lower management level employees
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
bone of contention between lower management level employees
The issue of executive compensation has been a bone of contention between lower management level employees and the executives. In most cases, the executive’s packages are perceived to be the excesses ranges especially when it can be seen that there exist great disparities between the executives’ compensation packages and those of other employees (Wiseman & Gomez, 2002). The case study on Oakwood lawns helps in expostulating on the issue. The Oakwood CEO’s annual salary was $975000. With the addition of bonuses, stock awards, retirement benefits, and other benefits, his total compensation was close to $10 million a year while the average landscaping technicians is paid $28000 annually. This disparity which was heavily publicized by the media led to an uproar in the organization’s workforce. It is therefore a requirement for Don Henry, the director of human resources, to come up with means of talking with the outraged employees, offer the correct information and hence ensure that there is accurate understanding between all levels of management (Wade, O’Reilly & Pollock, 2016).
With the coverage of the CEO’s compensation package that brings into light the inequities between different management levels, it is prudent for Don to first identify additional information about the CEO’s pay package to share with the employees so as to clear up the misunderstanding.
The first thing that the other employees should understand is that executive pay packages are usually different from the typical salaried employee compensation. This is because, unlike the typical employee compensation, most of the CEO’s or most of the executive’s payment is contingent compensation that is made to reward the CEO/executive for actual company performance as well as growth in shareholder value. In this case, the executive compensation package generally encompasses six compensation components which are: base salary, short term incentives, long term incentives, employee benefits, perquisites and severance or change in control payments. Base salaries entails the CEO getting relatively higher salaries irrespective of how the company is fairing so as to offer incentives for he executive to work harder and make strategic and smart decisions. This is the reason why many CEO’s base salaries are over $1million. Bonuses on the other hand are made to reward CEOs on their performance hence they also work as an additional incentive for the CEOs to work harder (Baker, Jensen, & Murphy, 1988). Short term and long term incentives as well as employee benefits are made link the CEO’s financial interests with those of the company hence they too are made to make the executive focus on continual growth for the company. In essence, a company’s compensation committee structures its executive’s pay package while utilizing the mentioned components so as to achieve its pay for performance objectives or its retention objectives.
The second aspect of CEO compensation that Don can share with the other employees is fact that cash payments only make a small fraction of the actual earnings. According to a survey done in 2015 on fifty major companies, only 37% of CEO salaries were given in cash while 54% came from stocks and options and the remainder was made up of perks and pensions. In this case, the CEO compensation package is likely to look astronomical to the common employee but this is not the case since the package is tied to concrete results and long term incentives (Wade, O’Reilly & Pollock, 2016).
There are also additional factors that stipulate on how a company should pay its CEO. Those factors include peer company comparisons whereby the company’s CEO compensation packages are benchmarked against its industry standards, the brand which the CEO represents since its common knowledge that some CEOs are branded as exceptional executives and the fact that the company sits on the shoulders of the CEO hence it is imperative to compensate him/her well so as to make sure that he/she feels encouraged to strive for the best for the company (Wiseman & Gomez, 2002).
While presenting the above facts to the other employees, it is prudent for Don to be careful when explaining the pay disparities to the employees to ease their concerns about the fairness of the CEO’s pay. First, Don should understand the basis of the employee’s outrage. The first question to ask is whether the employees’ outrage is caused by ignorance or whether they have a basis on why they are angry. In this case, Don should first listen to what the employees have to say on the issue so as to be able to present his information in a better manner. It’s imperative for Don to present facts and not opinions on the issue while demystifying the issue of the CEO’s package (Tosi & Mejia, 1994). While explaining the disparities, Don should talk in a simple and concise language that can be understood by any employee. In this case, he should avoid using executives’ words such as stock incentives but strive to use a language that can be understood even to the employee who does not have any knowledge on the business aspect of the company. Open and effective communication can be the one tool that Don can use to make sure that his information is received by the employees in the intended way and hence in ascertaining that the employees are satisfied with the situation.
From the above discussion of the case study, it can be ascertained that disparities in compensation packages between CEOs and the employees which they lead often leads to discontentment and outrage among the employees. Failure to address the issue effectively leads to low morale among the employees hence this leads to unproductivity for the affected company. Therefore, it is prudent for the company to employ methodologies of making sure that there is open communication between the employees and the executives of the company and that the employees understand the dynamics behind the compensation package for their CEO (Bebchuk & M., 2003).
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!