Birdye Henrietta Haynes Discussion Assignment
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Birdye Henrietta Haynes Discussion Assignment
Unit 5 Assignment 2 – Profitable Investment
Submit Assignment
Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 50
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Estimated time to complete: 2 hours
Instructions
Dermatology Associates of Linwood is moving forward with the acquisition of the second practice discussed in Assignment 1. You have been meeting with Sharon, the second location’s practice manager, acquainting her with DAL’s operational standards. Sharon expressed concern about the immediate purchase of the Fraxel laser.
Sharon explained that the former practice physician-owner avoided purchasing one, because the return was not worth the investment. With the purchase price averaging $25,000, you definitely understand Sharon’s concern, but you also know Fraxel treatments at DAL are one of the leading services contributing to your overall revenue. This is primarily due to the fact that Fraxel treatments are classified as a cosmetic procedure, with payment required upfront from the patient.
In an Excel document, use one of the concepts presented in chapter 9 to show Sharon why the investment would be profitable.
Assume the opportunity cost of capital is 12%.
Include cash flows for six months
Assume the number of treatments you will need to perform each month.
The treatment price at DAL’s existing clinic is $1,200. You will need to lower this price point to be more appealing to the new practice’s patient base.
Below your calculation, insert a text box and provide the rationale for using the method you used, as well as the new price you set for the treatment. Word it as if you are speaking to Sharon, explaining how profitability is determined.
Include any references in APA style in a textbox at the bottom of your Excel document.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.
Submit:
Profitable Investment
Rubric
HC306 Unit 5 Assignment 2 – Profitable Investment
HC306 Unit 5 Assignment 2 – Profitable Investment |
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfitability Concept |
15.0 pts
Level 5
Identifies and correctly applies at least one appropriate profitability concept; selected concept fully and logically supports the stated argument. |
13.5 pts
Level 4
Identifies and correctly applies one appropriate profitability concept; selected concept logically supports the stated argument. |
12.0 pts
Level 3
Identifies and somewhat correctly applies one profitability concept; selected concept somewhat supports the stated argument. |
10.5 pts
Level 2
Identifies and somewhat correctly applies one profitability concept; selected concept minimally supports the stated argument. |
9.0 pts
Level 1
Identifies but incorrectly applies one profitability concept; selected concept does not support the stated argument. |
0.0 pts
Level 0
Does not identify any profitability concepts. |
|
15.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCash Flow |
15.0 pts
Level 5
Clearly and comprehensively develops a full six-month cash flow statement; data clearly and correctly reflect the assignment scenario. |
13.5 pts
Level 4
Clearly develops a full six-month cash flow statement; most data correctly reflect the assignment scenario. |
12.0 pts
Level 3
Develops an acceptable six-month cash flow statement; some data correctly reflect the assignment scenario. |
10.5 pts
Level 2
Develops a somewhat limited or incomplete six-month cash flow statement; some data do not reflect the assignment scenario. |
9.0 pts
Level 1
Develops a very incomplete cash flow statement; data do not reflect the assignment scenario. |
0.0 pts
Level 0
Does not complete a cash flow statement. |
|
15.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRationalePRICE-P |
15.0 pts
Level 5
Strong, clear, and logical rationale presented that effectively supports the methods used; clearly and correctly explains how profitability is determined. |
13.5 pts
Level 4
Clear and logical rationale presented that somewhat supports the methods used; correctly explains how profitability is determined. |
12.0 pts
Level 3
Somewhat logical rationale presented that supports the methods used; correctly but briefly explains how profitability is determined. |
10.5 pts
Level 2
Somewhat illogical rationale presented that supports the methods used; correctly but briefly explains how profitability is determined. |
9.0 pts
Level 1
Very brief and illogical rationale presented; does not supports the methods used; incorrectly explains how profitability is determined. |
0.0 pts
Level 0
Does not provide a rationale. |
|
15.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Style, grammar, spelling and APA FormattingPRICE-I |
5.0 pts
Level 5
Writing is completely error free in grammar, spelling and APA formatting, citations and 3 or more references. |
4.5 pts
Level 4
A few very minor errors noted in grammar, spelling, or APA formatting, citations and at least 3 references. |
4.0 pts
Level 3
A few minor errors noted in grammar, spelling, and APA formatting, citations and 2-3 references. |
3.5 pts
Level 2
Several errors noted in grammar, spelling, or APA formatting, citations and 1-2 references. |
3.0 pts
Level 1
Some major errors noted in grammar, spelling, and APA formatting, citations and only 1 reference. |
0.0 pts
Level 0
Many major errors in grammar, spelling, and APA formatting, citations and references. |
|
5.0 pts |
Total Points: 50.0 |
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!