Order ID 535BBTG773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Topic: bioethics: physician assisted suicide
Paper details:****PLEASE BE SURE THE POLICY DEVELOPED AND THE SCRIPT MATCH IN TERMS OF WHAT THE NURSE (WRITER) IS TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH****
The goal of this assignment is to simulate an advocacy meeting with a member of Congress based on your selected bioethical issue. Each student will:
1) develop a one-page policy brief, also known as a one-page ASK, using the instructions in the RWJ Connect Manual (see resources).
2) develop a script for a meeting between the student as the nurse advocate for a group cause, and a person that can influence policy (i.e., Legislator, Congressperson, State Representative). As professional nurses, it is important to continue to improve verbal expression.
3) Therefore, students will role-play communicating this advocacy issue to the targeted stakeholder. Using RWJF Connect Manual pages 11-36, develop a strategy for this meeting. The final assignment should be comprised of a) script, b) a one-page “Ask”, and c) a video recording.
This project will be completed in three parts:
Part 1: Script
Use the RWJ Connect Manual (p. 11) as your template. see link: GNRS 504Z+Week 15+RWJ+CONNECT+Manual-1.pdfPreview the document
The following components should be included in your script:
Start your meeting right (RWJ, p. 12)
Who you are and what you do (RWJ, p. 13-18)
Story about how you work (RWJ, p. 19-23)
What you want: Identifying and Ask (RWJ, p. 24-29)
Closing the Meeting (RWJ, p. 30)
Part 2: One-page ASK or policy briefDevelop a one-page ASK or policy brief using RWJ Manual suggestions (p. 31-34).
What is an ASK? An ask is policy-speak for a specific request that you make of your policymaker during your meeting. Whether you’re talking with a member in person or with a staffer, they will be waiting for you to make the They expect it, and in some cases, they will even prompt you…The bottom line—always be prepared with a good ask (See RWJM readings for full text).
Includes: introduction, foreshadow, stick to what’s important, telling details, and focuses on what it matters (see p. 14).
A good ASK is: Actionable, linked to policy maker’s interests, and advances your work.
SAMPLE: one page ASK GNRS 504Z+Week 15+ASK OnePager-Diabetes-Mobile-Apps.pdfPreview the document***** PLEASE MAKE THE SCRIPT 2 PAGES LONG. THE TWO SECTIONS SHOULD RELATE TO PHYSICIAN ASSISTED SUICIDE. I HAVE ATTACHED THE LINKS IN CASE YOU ARE UNABLE OT ACCESS THEM BY CLICKING.
I HAVE ALSO ATTACHED MY PAPER ON PHYSICIAN ASSISTED SUICIDE. WHEN WRITING THE SCRIPT AND THE ONE PAGE ASK-PLEASE TRY TO CHOOSE A SIDE OF THE DEBATE. EITHER ASKING THE CONGRESS PERSON TO MAKE IT ILLEGAL FOR PHYSICIANS TO ASSIST IN DEATH OR TO MAKE IT LEGAL-WHATEVER YOU CAN FIND BETTER MATERIAL ON-NEEDS TO BE WRITTEN FROM A SCHOLARLY NURSING PERSPECTIVE PLEASE*****
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!