Big Data and Business Intelligence
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Assessment Type Individual assignment Assessment Title Business Intelligence, data mining and Big Data Purpose of the This assignment is designed to assess students’ knowledge and skills related to the assessment (with following learning outcomes: CLO Mapping) 1. LO-1: Describe the business intelligence (BI) methodology and concepts. 2. LO-2: Understand the objectives and benefits of business analytics and data mining. 3. LO-3: Understand the motivation for and business drivers of Big Data analytics Weight 15% of the total assessments Total Marks 100 Word limit NA Submission • All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a cover page. Guidelines • The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2.54 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. • Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style. Due Date Week 14, 22th May 2020 – submit your report on Moodle Late submission • late project submissions will result in a penalty. A one-week late submission results in a 10% deduction on the project marking; while a project submitted between 1 and 2 weeks late will be subject to a 20% deduction on the project marking. Submissions after two weeks will be considered a fail on the project. Academic • Plagiarism is defined as the presentation of another person’s work as your own. Misconduct and This includes copying from books without referencing the material or copying Plagiarism from another student’s work. Instructor Name Dr Mostafa Kamil Moderator Name Dr Don
SEN 4210
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Description of the task
LO-2 (Problem 1)
Examine the most common data mining approaches. What are the key distinctions between them?
LO-2 and LO-3 are the second and third problems, respectively.
Examine how modern data collection devices, such as RFID tags, might assist firms in precisely identifying and segmenting their customers for purposes like targeted marketing and prediction. Data mining techniques are used in several of these applications.
Scrutinize the literature and the Internet for five new data mining applications that can make use of the data generated by RFID technology.
What problems might develop if a country’s laws mandated that such devices be implanted in everyone’s body in order to establish a national identity system?
LO-1 and LO-3 are the third and fourth problems, respectively.
Go to https://www.cloudera.com/ for more information. Find at least two client case studies on Hadoop adoption and produce a report outlining the similarities and differences between them.
Please note that the original case studies should be included to your answer sheet.
LO-1 and LO-3 (Problem 4)
Search for articles about stream analytics at google.com/scholar. Find at least three articles that are linked. After you’ve finished reading, make a summary of what you’ve learned.
Please note that you must attach the source articles to your answer sheet.
Business Intelligence and Big Data (SEN 4210) is a course in which students learn about business intelligence and big data.
Criteria for grading:
The following table lists the marking criteria. The following is how marks are assigned:
Sections to be included in Description of the section Marks the report Problem-1 Discuss the main data mining methods. 15 Problem-2 Discuss data mining application using RFID data 25 Problem-3 Critically analyze the content of the chosen case 25 studies Problem-4 Critically analyze the content of the chosen articles. 30 Reference style Follow IEEE reference style 5 Total 100 Marking Rubric for Assignment-1: Total Marks 100 Note: The marking rubrics varies for each assignment Mark 80-100% 70-88% 60-68% 50-58% <50% Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Problem-1 All topics are Topics are Generally Some This is not /15 pertinent and relevant and relevant and relevance relevant to the covered in depth. soundly analysed. and briefly assignment Ability to think analysed. presented. topic. critically and source material is demonstrated Problem-2: Logic is clear and Consistency Mostly Adequate The argument is /25 easy to follow with logical and consistent cohesion and confused and strong arguments convincing logical and conviction disjointed convincing Problem-3: Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrate Demonstrate Demonstrated /25 excellent very good d good d unsatisfactory understanding of understanding understanding satisfactory understanding the two case of defining the of defining understandin of the two case studies. two case the two case g of the two studies. studies. studies. case studies. Problem-4: Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrate Demonstrate Demonstrated /30 excellent very good d good d unsatisfactory understanding of understanding understanding satisfactory understanding the three articles. of defining the of defining understandin of the three three articles. the three g of the articles. articles three articles. Reference Clear styles with Clear Generally Sometimes Lacks consistency style excellent source of referencing good clear with many errors references. style referencing referencing /5 style style
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!