Biblical Metanarrative Nursing Integrated Essay

Biblical Metanarrative Nursing Integrated Essay

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages To Order	5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions Subject Nursing Topic Integrated Essay Type Essay Level College Style APA Sources 1 Language English(U.S.) Description Part 1: Summary of the Biblical Metanarrative In your own words, briefly summarize the following “acts” of the biblical metanarrative. Use the course materials (lessons, textbooks, etc.) as guides. Be sure to highlight how each major act relates to Christian worldview.Act I: The God of Creation Act II: Sin Enters the World Act III: God Covenants with Israel Act IV: Jesus and the New Covenant Act V: The Fellowship of Believers Part 2: Identification of the Source of Christian Ethics The purpose of this portion of the assignment is to distinguish the key or definitive reference point of the Christian moral life. To complete this section, identify and describe the source of Christian ethics and support your answer. You can use any sources for support in your response, but you must at least include support from the biblical text.Part 3: Description of the Biblical Metanarrative’s Living Principles The purpose of this portion of the assignment is to develop connections between the biblical metanarrative and the Christian principles that guide daily life. Describing the foundational, life-guiding Christian values that derive from the biblical metanarrative is one of the most difficult – and most important – steps you will take in this course. Some principles are provided, but you will also need to articulate (and support) your own. Three living principles are provided for the student. These three living principles derive from Chapter 8 in Goheen & Bartholomew’s Living at the Crossroads (see in particular pages 138-39). The student should provide an explanation and illustration of each of these three principles. The student should also identify two additional living principles that she/he believes are comparably significant as the three provided. The student should explain and illustrate both of these additional living principles. The final result should consist of five living principles of the biblical metanarrative: Creational Design Cultural Idolatry Healing Potential (Student Identifies) (Student Identifies) Part 4: Workship Reflection The purpose of this portion is to reflect on your experience in attending a university Workship Program as one example of integrating Christian values and biblical faith with the work that you do. For this section you should answer the following questions: What have you learned about servanthood through your Workship or community service experience? How do you understand the relationship between servanthood and Christian values? In what ways has your experience in Workship or community service prepared you for a lifestyle that incorporates volunteerism and community servanthood? What role will volunteerism play in your lifestyle after your experience at your university? What particular organizations or community roles interest you the most? What should I write if I did not participate in the Workship Program? Students who are exempt from a university Workship requirement may instead reflect on community service involvement comparable to participation in the Workship program. Students reflecting on a comparable community service experience should address the same five questions identified above. Part 5: Application of Living Principles The final section invites the student to articulate how the Christian values and biblical faith developed in Parts 1-3 are expressed in the student’s personal life and vocation. This portion of the assignment should fully develop the following components: Integration of Living Principles This component should describe how you think each of the living principles developed above relates to and is best expressed within your vocation. How does someone with the skill-sets you earned at a university live out these principles? Sources that inform your approach This component should identify scriptures, texts/authors, concepts, or philosophies/philosophical schools that are foundational to your values and view of the world. Explain why these sources are significant and how they shape your thinking. Identification of models or examples This component should identify notable efforts by an individual or group that serves as a role-model for your vocational goals. To complete this component: Identify an established, professional (i.e. employed in, or significantly serving in your chosen field) individual or group that serves as a role-model for your vocational goals and indicate the reasons why they serve as a role-model for you (notable efforts, accomplishments, etc.). You may not use a family relative or fellow student/peer. Interviewing peers and family members is not fresh insight. Note: If you have not chosen a career yet, then choose one person whom you look up to and who is established and working professionally in the area of your major. Interview the individual or group representative. Key questions for the interviewee should focus on the following: How do you integrate and exemplify your values and worldview with your vocation? What are ethical challenges are inherent in the your vocation? How did you deal with those challenges as a person of faith? If you had to do it all over again, what would you do differently? What advice would you give someone going into this field? In your reflection on the interview, respond to the following questions: How do you think you would deal with the ethical challenges identified by the person you interviewed, as well as any other ethical challenges you see? Would you respond in the same way as the person you interviewed, or would you respond differently? Explain your response. Major challenges involved What obstacles or difficulties do you face as you seek to integrate your worldview and values with your vocation in life? How do you propose to deal with these challenges? Potential outcomes When you successfully live out your worldview and life mission, what happens? What are the consequences for you and your community? What is the purpose of this assignment? The purpose of this assignment is to provide an opportunity for the student to articulate the integration of Christian values and biblical faith with her or his vocational life. Stated more broadly, this assignment is the culminating expression of your work in this course. What should I write? Your essay should include the following five components: Summary of the biblical metanarrative Identification of the source of christian ethics Description of the biblical metanarrative’s “living principles” Reflection on your experience in the Workship Program Application of living principles to your vocational goals and specific skill-sets developed through your University education. There is 5 parts, Please separate each part Spacing Double Pages 8 Integrated Essay Rubric Rubric Points Prerequisites (Top Score: 0 Points | Low Score: – 5 Points) Essay is well written, grammatically accurate and reflects a formal writing style 0/-5 Essay is clearly and logically organized according to the assignment instructions 0/-5 Essay does not exhibit typographical errors 0/-5 Part 1: Biblical Metanarrative Assignment concisely and accurately summarizes each of the five “Acts” of the biblical metanarrative (5 points each) 25 Part 2: Source of Christian Ethics Assignment identifies the source of Christian ethics and provides supporting evidence 10 Part 3: Living Principles Assignment clearly develops each of the five “living principles” related to the biblical metanarrative (5 points each) 1.    Creational Design 2.    Cultural Idolatry 3.    Healing Potential 4.    (Student Identified) 5.    (Student Identified) 25 Part 4: Workship Assignment addresses all five questions related to Workship 1.    How do you understand the relationship between servanthood and Christian values? 2.    What have you learned about servanthood through your Workship or community service experience? 3.    In what ways has your experience in Workship or community service prepared you for a lifestyle that incorporates volunteerism and community servanthood? 4.    What role will volunteerism play in your lifestyle after your experience at PBA? 5.    What organizations or community roles interest you the most? 15 Part 5: Application of Living Principles Assignment integrates living principles with student’s vocation/major/skill set 10 Assignment identifies sources that inform the student’s approach to the essay 10 Assignment identifies role model and describes how role model exemplifies student’s worldview and/or life mission 10 Assignment identifies major challenges involved 10 Assignment considers on the potential outcomes of successfully living out the student’s worldview and life mission 10 Total 125
RUBRIC Quality of Response No Response Poor/Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization;  and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!