Order ID | 53563633773 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Type | Essay | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Writer Level | Masters | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Style | APA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sources/References | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perfect Number of Pages To Order | 5-10 Pages | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description/Paper InstructionsFormulate one new comment of your own. It must be a logical and thoughtful response that synthesizes the comments of at least 3 classmates into one comment. Be sure to synthesize; do not simply reply to each of the 3 classmates. 1. For module one, I chose the environmental factors and have recognized the injuries and hostile environments that it is causing in the states. The environment directly affects the health status and plays a major role in quality of life, years of life lived and health disparities. Factors such as poor air quality, second hand smoke, the safety on land and sea. Environmental factors might seem so vague but it can contribute to cancers, cardiovascular disease, asthma and other illnesses. Poor water can lead to GI illnesses, cancers and neurological problems. Environmental factors are also dependent on environmental quality across life stages starting from infancy to geriatrics. Each age group is at a different risk for developing or more likely to develop certain medical conditions (HP, 2020). Between 2006–2008 and 2016-2018, potential exposure to unhealthy air quality decreased 43%, from 7.603 to 4.296 billion, exceeding the HP2020 target. Between 2005–2008 and 2013-2016, exposure to secondhand smoke among children aged 3–11 years decreased 27.0%, from 52.2% to 38.1%, exceeding the HP2020 target. In 2013-2016, several groups of children in specific demographic categories had the lowest rates of secondhand smoke exposure, including Asian children, those born outside the U.S., those with private health insurance, and those in families with incomes at 500% or more of the poverty threshold (HP, 2020). Being aware of these leading health indicators and keeping up to date data and statistics play a huge role in continuing to thrive towards a healthier nation/world. Amanda 2. Back in Module 1, I discussed a few Leading Health Indicators (LHI), but the one I focused on the most was access to health services and how it a major issue in healthcare today. According to the Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (n.d.), “access to care often varies based on race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, age, sex, disability status, sexual orientation, gender identity, and residential location.” Objectives associated with access to health services are: increasing the proportion of persons with health insurance, and increasing the proportions with a usual primary care provider, to name a couple (Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, n.d.). Each objective is an important factor when attempting to make improvements to individuals and communities. Healthy People 2020 have had mixed results on the LHIs, with some improving or meeting their goal and some decreasing or having no change. The two objectives I mentioned that relate to access to health services both showed an increase compared to previous years. According to the Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (n.d.), “between 2008 and 2018, the rate of persons aged less than 65 years with health insurance increased 7.0%, from 83.2% to 89.0%,” and “between 2007 and 2016, there was no statistically significant change in the proportion of persons with a usual primary care provider” (76.3% in 2007 and 76.4% in 2016) (para 1&2). Based on this data, Healthy People 2020 is on the right track, but more improvement can always be made. New goals and objectives may be considered as the country grows and evolves through the years. Kaylee 3. The Leading Health Indicator I chose in Module One is Social Determinants. There has been some positive change to accomplish the Healthy People 2020 targets. For example, the on-time graduation rate (4 years in high school) increased by approximately 4 percent, from 74.9 % in 2007–2008 to 78.2% percent in 2009–2010 (Healthy People 2020 Leading Health Indicators, n.d.). This improvement shows two-fifths progress toward the Healthy People 2020 target of 82.%. In the school year 2017-2018, the Untied States had a public-school high school graduation rate of 85%, however it did not specify these students only had 4 years of high school (no repeats). The report also showed a vast difference in percentages amongst the different races. Asian Pacific Islander had a 92% graduation rate and White students graduated at an 89% rate. However, Hispanic students graduated at 81%, Black students at 79% and American Indian/Alaska Native students had a graduation rate of 74% (National Center for Education Statistics, May 2020). The rates also varied state to state and by race/ethnicity in each state. Some states show the graduation for Black students at 67%, which is well below the Healthy People 2020 target. While the overall national average has increased and met the Health People 2020 target, there are still many states and races/ethnicities that are not meeting that target and still falling well below. Jane |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDERCLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!