Battle on Haifa Street, Baghdad, Iraq
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Battle on Haifa Street, Baghdad, Iraq
Are you tube a source of journalism?
Is this a legitimate example of journalism? Why or why not
Clip 1: Battle on Haifa Street, Baghdad, Iraq
The Battle of Haifa Street was a battle fought for the control of Haifa Street in January 2007. In the late 2007, Logan filed a report about fighting along Haifa Street in Baghdad. The CBS news refused to run the report on the nightly news because the footage was a bit strong. Logan tried to win the support of the public to counter that decision. Logan said that he would be very grateful if anyone had a chance to watch the story and pass the link on to as many people they knew. He wanted the story to be seen by everyone. Logan went on to use some of the Haifa Street material during a sixty minutes report about life in Baghdad under the surge. This is legitimate journalism. According to the power points a journalist is describe as someone who subjects work to verification, makes a conscious effort to maintain independence and is accountable. The primary mission of journalists is to inform the public by collecting and presenting information according to standards that define journalism.
Clip 2: Fallujah CBS story
It is a report by CBS on the battle for Fallujah. The report stated that an IED detonation was a lucky strike against US military. I think this is a legitimate example of journalism. The journalists gathered enough information for the media outlet that disseminates the information through a broad medium like the newspaper, magazine, television and motion picture. The participating units were the American forces, the Iraqi forces and the British forces. The journalists asserted that the continuous slaughter in Fallujah greatly contributed to escalating violence on other regions of the country. They also revealed that violence prompted by the U.S. invasion resulted in the assassinations of at least 338 Iraqi’s associated with Iraq’s new government. The reporters gave the public more information about the battle participants, proceedings and the casualties. The journalist practiced verification, transparency, acknowledged when they could not verify and acknowledged the mistakes they made during their coverage.
Clip 3: My Iraq Music Video
This video is in the entertainment category. The goal of entertainment is to amuse or engage people during their leisure period in activities which they are passive participants.
I think this is a legitimate example of journalism because pictures are used to relay the information to the public of what actually happened in Iraq although there is no accountability of the journalist. The information provided is verified by the pictures shown. The journalist does not abide by the code of ethics of the Society of Professional Journalist. That is there is no accountability to the readers, listeners and the viewers. The information given was useful in the end. The video showed the violence that was experienced in Iraq. The video showed how the forces were armed and the equipment used like the tankers and the weapons. The journalist made an effort to maintain independence. This video shows reliable information which is also the truth.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!