Battle for Market Leadership
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Battle for Market Leadership
Case Teaching Note 05 – Competition in the Movie Rental Industry in 2008: Netflix & Block¬buster Battle for Market Leadership
Teaching Outline and Analysis
- How strong are the competitive forces in the movie rental marketplace? Do a five-forces analysis to support your answer.
Below is a representative five-forces model of competition in the movie rental industry:
n Rivalry among companies competing in movie rentals—
n Threat of entry
n Competition from substitutes—
n The bargaining power and leverage of suppliers—
n The bargaining power and leverage of people renting DVDs—
Conclusions concerning the overall strength of competitive forces:
- What forces are driving change in the movie rental industry? Are these driving forces likely to have a favorable or unfavorable impact on competitive intensity and future industry profitability?
Conclusions:
.
- What does your strategic group map of this industry look like? Is Netflix well-positioned? Why or why not?
Figure 1 A Representative Strategic Group Map of the Movie Rental Industry
- What key factors will determine a company’s success in the movie rental industry in the next 3-5 years?
- What is Netflix’s strategy? Which of the five generic competitive strategies discussed in Chapter 5 most closely fit the competitive approach that Netflix is taking? What type of competitive advantage is Netflix trying to achieve?
Netflix’s Competitive Advantage
- What does a SWOT analysis of Netflix reveal about the overall attractiveness of its situation?
Netflix’s Resource Strengths and Competitive Assets
Netflix’s Resource Weaknesses and Competitive Liabilities
Netflix’s External Market Opportunities
External Threats to Netflix’s Future Profitability
Conclusions concerning Netflix’s situation.
- What is your appraisal of Netflix’s operating and financial performance based on the data in case Exhibits 2, 3, and 4? What positives and negatives do you see in Netflix’s performance? Use the financial ratios in Table 4.1 of Chapter 4 as a guide in doing the calculations needed to arrive at an analysis-based answer to your assessment of Netflix’s recent financial performance.
n Netflix’s profit margins have changed as follows:
2000 2002 2004 2005 2006 2007 Gross profit margin (gross profit as a % of revenues) Operating profit margin (operating income as a % of revenues) Net profit margin (net income as a % of revenues) Calculated from information in case Exhibit 3.
n The following table shows assorted expense ratios for Netflix:
2000 2002 2004 2005 2006 2007 Subscription costs as a % of subscription revenues Fulfillment costs as a % of total revenues Technology and development costs as a % of total revenues Marketing costs as a % of total revenues General and admin costs as a % of total revenues Calculated from information in case Exhibit 3.
Positives (or strengths) in Netflix’s operating and financial performance based on the data in case Exhibits 2, 3, and 4:
Negatives (or weaknesses) in Netflix’s operating and financial performance based on the data in case Exhibits 2, 3, and 4:
- What does a SWOT analysis of Blockbuster reveal about the overall attractiveness of its situation?
Blockbuster’s Resource Strengths and Competitive Assets
Blockbuster’s Resource Weaknesses and Competitive Liabilities
Blockbuster’s External Market Opportunities
External Threats to Blockbuster’s Future Prospects
- What is your appraisal of Blockbuster’s performance as shown in case Exhibit 5? What pluses and minuses do you see? Use the financial ratios in Table 4.1 of Chapter 4 as a guide in doing the calculations needed to arrive at an analysis-based answer to your assessment of Blockbuster’s recent performance.
Conclusions:
- How does Netflix’s competitive strength compare against that of Blockbuster? Do a weighted competitive strength assessment using the methodology presented in Table 4.4 of Chapter 4 to support your answer. Does Netflix have a sustainable competitive advantage over Blockbuster in the movie rental business? Why or why not?
Table 1 Competitive Strength Assessments of Netflix and Blockbuster
(Rating scale: 1 = very weak; 5 = average; 10 = very strong)
Competitive Strength Measures Importance Weight Netflix Blockbuster Rating Score Rating Score Number/variety of titles in library of content offerings Ease and convenience of choosing movies to rent Ease and convenience of returning rented DVDs Competitive pricing/variety of subscription plans Brand image/ability to attract customers Order-filling capabilities Geographic market coverage Ability to access movie rental customers Financial strength Sum of weights Total Rating/Score
- What recommendations would you make to Netflix CEO Reed Hastings? At a minimum, your recommendations should cover what to do about each of the top priority issues identified in question 11.
- What recommendations would you make to Blockbuster CEO James Keyes? At a minimum, your recommendations should cover what to do about each of the top priority issues identified in question 11.
Epilogue
Netflix reported revenues of $1.36 billion for 2008 (versus $1.2 billion in 2007) and net income of $83 million (equal to $1.32 per diluted share) versus net income of $66.6 million in 2007 and diluted EPS of $0.97. Net cash flows from operating activities were $284.0 million versus $277.4 million in 2007. At year-end 2008, Netflix had cash and cash equivalents of $139.9 million (versus $177.4 million at the end of 2007) and short-term investments of $157.4 million (versus $207.7 million at the end of 2007).
Netflix ended 2008 with approximately 9,390,000 total subscribers, representing 26% year-over-year growth from 7,479,000 total subscribers at the end of 2007 and 8% sequential growth from 8,672,000 subscribers at the end of the third quarter of 2008. Subscriber acquisition cost for 2008 was $29.12 per gross subscriber addition compared to $40.86 for 2007.
In January 2009, Netflix announced partnerships with LG Electronics and Vizio, both makers of big-screen high-definition TVs, that would enable Netflix subscribers to watch movies streamed from Netflix directly to new Internet-connected LG and Vizio TV models that would be equipped with manufacturer-installed devices enabling such streaming. Netflix subscribers with such TVs would no longer need an external device to enable Netflix to stream movies directly to their TVs. Earlier, in November 2008, Netflix announced that its subscribers could have movies and TV episodes instantly streamed to their TVs via the Xbox 360 video game and entertainment system utilizing the New Xbox Experience that premiered nationwide on November 19. The Xbox 360 was the only game and entertainment console that let users instantly watch movies and TV episodes streamed from Netflix to the TV. There was no additional monthly fee for Netflix members who were also Xbox LIVE Gold members.
Netflix management projected that full-year 2009 results would be as follows:
- Ending subscribers of 10.6 million to 11.3 million
- Revenue of $1.58 billion to $1.635 billion
- Net income of $88 million to $98 million
- EPS of $1.43 to $1.59 per diluted share
For the first three quarters of 2008, Blockbuster reported total revenues of $3.90 billion versus total revenues of $3.975 billion for the first nine months of 2007. Both rental revenues and merchandise sales were down slightly from 2007 levels. The company reported a net loss of $22.7 million for the first nine months of 2008, significantly better than the loss of $123.2 million for the first nine months of 2007. Net cash flows from operations for the first nine months of 2008 were a negative $101.1 million. To contain its operating losses, Blockbuster management cut advertising expenditures to $94.8 million during the first nine months of 2008 (versus $158.9 million for the first three quarters of 2007). Long-term debt was $614.8 million, down from $665.6 million at the end of 2007.
At the end of the third quarter of 2008, Blockbuster had 5,843 company-owned stores, of which 3,909 were domestic and 1,934 were foreign. Counting franchised stores, Blockbuster had 7,525 stores as of October 5, 2008, down 305 stores since January 1, 2008. Domestic same-store revenues increased 5.1% in the third quarter of 2008 as compared to the third quarter of 2007, due to a 0.8% growth in same-store rental revenues and a 30.7% increase in same-store merchandise sales, largely driven by a significant increase in sales of games software and hardware. International same-store revenues decreased 3.4% as compared to the same period last year, reflecting a 2.2% decline in same-store rental revenues and a 5.0% decline in same-store merchandise sales. Worldwide same-store revenues grew 1.9% from the same period last year.
On March 3, 2009, Blockbuster announced that it had hired a prominent law firm that specialized in financially-troubled enterprises to advise the company on financing and capital-raising efforts; the company’s stock price plunged from about $1 per share to $0.22 on the announcement. On March 4, Standard & Poors placed Blockbuster on its credit watch list, including its speculative ‘B-’ corporate credit rating, in light of pending maturities of a revolving credit line and term loan A debt in August 2009. There were doubts that Blockbuster would be able to refinance the debt that was maturing in August. On March 5, Blockbuster announced that same-store sales rose 4.4% in the fourth quarter of 2008 and that domestic same-store sales were up 6.4% for full-year 2008. The increase in 4th quarter 2008 same-store sales was comprised of a 2.6% decrease in domestic same-store rental comparables and a 36.5% increase in domestic same-store retail comparables, which was largely driven by increased sales of games, game merchandise and consumer electronics. These sales increases prompted Blockbuster’s stock price to rise to the $0.50-$0.65 range as of March 6, 2009.
Please check the investor relations sections and the press releases at www.netflix.com and www.blockbuster.com for the latest developments on how these two movie rental competitors are faring.
CTN 5-10
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!