Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Management homework
CASE STUDIES 5Case Studies
Student’s Name:
Institutional Affiliation:
Case Studies
Back Bay University Case Study
Question 1
A formal salvage program will help to plan well and ensure that the old equipment and scrap metals are sold at the best prices possible. The foreman and others who are selling the scrap metal to the faculty staff may be doing so at a throw-away price. Hence, the money that is received may be too little. The formalization will help to bargain and sell them the way they should such that a substantial amount of money is obtained. The money used to carry out development at the school or attend to other important matters. The little money that is being received currently is used or vital matters but more can be done if the process is finalized. Some of the funds can be used to fund research. For instance, through buying laboratory apparatus and chemicals necessary for experimentation. Besides. Some of those funds could be sued to offer scholarships to some of the students and hence, they will not have a heavy burden. Another importance of having a formal salvage program is that it will be possible to track how the finances are used to avoid any embezzlement or misuse. Every expenditure needs to be accounted for by the procurement team.
Question 2
Such a program can be opposed because it can lead to quarrels among the parties involved in the process of selling the equipment and scrap metals and the procurement team. Some staff members might see it as if it is a scheme by some of the workers to gain financially without involving others. Such arguments can even affect the way the university is run and the teaching process. Therefore, leaving the selling of such equipment to continue the way it has been happening can be a better option if things are observed from that perspective. The stability of operations at the school should always be put first.
Hydrosub Case Study
Question 1
The project supervisor at Bolger Shipyards Mr. Burt and the former chief buyer at Hydrosub are the ones who caused the poor performance of the Bolger contract. Burt did not inform the current chief buyer of Hydrosub Kathleen Johnson about the renegotiation of contact due to the change in design early enough. He delayed to convey such important information and thus, that led to more time being taken to talk to the management of Hydrosub. Burt also delayed giving vital information to the Bolger contract negotiators. Such information included periodic analysis, bimonthly reporting, and weekly time cards. Hence, funds were delayed and decisions could not be made on time. The former Chief buyer at Hydrosub is also responsible for the poor performance since he left without addressing the cost increase. Revision of the completion date had already been done four times.
Question 2
Production delays were caused by the project supervisor at Bolger Shipyards. He did not clarify everything early enough so that the Chief buyer at Hydrosub could inform the management of the necessary materials and costs to be availed on time. Burt was talking about the addition of costs due to the change in design when it was too late. Even Ms, Johnson was shocked but she had to adjust. What concerned her most is the fact that the project was to delay by four weeks. Such issues are better addressed at the beginning of awarding the contract so that the date of completion does not keep on changing. Cost miscalculations were done by the project supervisor at Bolger Shipyards and the former chief buyer at Hydro sub. However, it is Burt who misled Hydrosub’s chief buyer by not talking about the additional costs on time. He was speaking about the additional design costs when it is too late.
References
Back Bay University case study
Hydrosub’s unfloatable amphibious assault vehicle: Case study
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!