B06 Cost Estimating Case Study Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
B06 Cost Estimating Case Study Essay
ONLYDO QUESTION 8
B06 Cost Estimating
Directions: Be sure to make a copy of your answer before submitting it to Ashworth College for grading. Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English spelling and grammar. Your response should be a minimum of one (1) single spaced page to a maximum of two (2) pages in length.
For the figure provided, answer the following questions. Provide the correct units for each calculation. To obtain full credit, show all steps, state all assumptions (if any), and all the answers must be correct. Work must be neat and legible. A simply stated answer receives no points.
Excavation
- Enlarge the footprint by 5 feet for accuracy and slope, then determine the volume of topsoil to be removed and stockpiled, if the thickness 9”.
- If no soil is to be stockpiled, and the swell is 10 percent, how many truck loads will it take to cart away from the site using 7 cy trucks?
Foundation
A cross section of the 24” wide continuous footing is shown. Assume this footing detail applies to all footings throughout the building.
- Determine the total linear feet of footing required?
- Calculate the cross-sectional area of the footing?
- Determine the volume of concrete in cubic yards for the footing. Add 5% for waste and round off.
Slab
- Given that the slab is 4” thick, calculate the volume of concrete required for the slab (use 8% waste factor).
- Given WWF was specified for the reinforcing in the slab, determine how many rolls are required? Assumptions: 750 sf per roll and add 20% for lap and waste.
- Using the following labor and material rates calculate the cost to provide and install the WWF and pour the concrete slab.
Productivity rate for slab = 0.4 labor hours/cy
Productivity rate for WWF = 1 labor hour/roll
Labor rate for slab and WWF = $14.50/hr
Grading Rubric
Please refer to the rubric on the next page for the grading criteria for this assignment.
CATEGORYExemplarySatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryUnacceptable
10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points
Student provides a correct
topsoil volume and clearly
outlines logical calculation
steps.
Student provides a somewhat
correct topsoil volume and
adequately outlines logical
calculation steps.
Student provides a partially
correct topsoil volume and
partially outlines logical
calculation steps.
Student provides an incorrect
topsoil volume with minimal/no
outline of logical calculation
steps.
10 points 8 points 5 points0-2 points
Student provides a correct
truckload determination and
clearly outlines logical
calculation steps.
Student provides a somewhat
correct truckload determination
and adequately outlines logical
calculation steps.
Student provides a partially
correct truckload determination
and partially outlines logical
calculation steps.
Student provides an incorrect
truckload determination and
minimal/no outline of logical
calculation steps.
10 points8 points 5 points0-2 points
Student provides a correct strip
footing determination and
clearly outlines logical
calculation steps.
Student provides a somewhat
correct strip footing
determination and adequately
outlines logical calculation
steps.
Student provides a partially
correct strip footing
determination and partially
outlines logical calculation
steps.
Student provides an incorrect
strip footing determination and
minimal/no outline of logical
calculation steps.
5 points4 points 3 points0-2 points
Student provides a correct CSA
calculation and clearly outlines
logical calculation steps.
Student provides a somewhat
correct CSA calculation and
adequately outlines logical
calculation steps.
Student provides a partially
correct CSA calculation and
adequately outlines logical
calculation steps.
Student provides an incorrect
CSA calculation and minimal/no
outline of logical calculation
steps.
10 points8 points 5 points0-2 points
Student provides a correct
foundation concrete volume
determination and clearly
outlines logical calculation
steps.
Student provides a somewhat
correct foundation concrete
volume determination and
adequately outlines logical
calculation steps.
Student provides a partially
correct foundation concrete
volume determination and
partially outlines logical
calculation steps.
Student provides an incorrect
foundation concrete volume
determination and minimal/no
outline of logical calculation
steps.
10 points8 points 5 points0-2 points
Student provides a correct slab
concrete volume calculation
and clearly outlines logical
calculation steps.
Student provides a somewhat
correct slab concrete volume
calculation and adequately
outlines logical calculation
steps.
Student provides a partially
correct slab concrete volume
calculation and partially
outlines logical calculation
steps.
Student provides an incorrect
slab concrete volume
calculation and minimal/no
outline of logical calculation
steps.
15 points12 points 8 points0-5 points
Student provides a correct
WWF reinforcement
determination and clearly
outlines logical calculation
steps.
Student provides a somewhat
correct WWF reinforcement
determination and adequately
outlines logical calculation
steps.
Student provides a partially
correct WWF reinforcement
determination and partially
outlines logical calculation
steps.
Student provides an incorrect
WWF reinforcement
determination and minimal/no
outline of logical calculation
steps.
15 points12 points 8 points0-5 points
Student provides a correct LCE
calculation and clearly outlines
logical calculation steps.
Student provides a somewhat
correct LCE calculation and
adequately outlines logical
calculation steps.
Student provides a partially
correct LCE calculation and
partially outlines logical
calculation steps.
Student provides an incorrect
LCE calculation and minimal/no
outline of logical calculation
steps.
5 points4 points 3 points2 points
Student does not make any
errors in grammar or spelling,
especially those that distract
the reader from the content.
Student makes 1-2 errors in
grammar or spelling that
distract the reader from the
content.
Student makes 3-4 errors in
grammar or spelling that
distract the reader from the
content.
Student makes more than 4
errors in grammar or spelling
that distract the reader from
the content.
10 points8 points 5 points2 points
The paper is written in proper
format. All sources used for
quotes and facts are credible
and cited correctly. Excellent
organization, including a variety
of thoughtful transitions.
The paper is written in proper
format with only 1-2 errors. All
sources used for quotes and
facts are credible and most are
cited correctly. Adequate
organization includes a variety
of appropriate transitions.
The paper is written in proper
format with only 3-5 errors.
Most sources used for quotes
and facts are credible and cited
correctly. Response is poorly
organized, but may include a
few effective transitions.
The paper is not written in
proper format. Many sources
used for quotes and facts are
less than credible (suspect)
and/or are not cited correctly.
Response is disorganized and
does not include effective
transitions.
Question 4 –
Foundation: Cross-
sectional Area (CSA)
Calculation (5 Points)
Question 7 – Slab: WWF
Reinforcing
Determination
(15 Points)
Question 5 –
Foundation: Concrete
Volume Determination
(10 Points)
Question 6 – Slab:
Concrete Volume
Calculation (10 Points)
Format – APA Format,
Citations, Organization,
Transitions (10 Points)
Question 1 –
Excavation: Topsoil
Volume (10 Points)
Mechanics -Grammar,
Punctuation, Spelling
(5 Points)
Question 2 –
Excavation: Truckload
Determination (10
Points)
Question 8 – Labor Cost
Estimate (LCE)
Calculation (15 Points)
Question 3 –
Foundation: Strip
Footing Requirement
(10 Points)
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!