Assignment on Diabetes Response Paper
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Assignment on Diabetes Response Paper
Examine the following therapies and their justifications. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Why? What evidence from this week’s content or outside sources can you use to back up your claims?
The goal of this debate is to suggest two resources for a 15-year-old guy who has recently been diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes. Chronic illnesses like diabetes, unfortunately, have the potential to cause mental health problems in youth. They desire to be like their classmates and fit in with a group during this stage of their development. According to research, depression rates among youth with diabetes can range from 8% to 22% (Behavioral health and diabetes, 2021). There are two reasons, in my opinion, why this patient is depressed. For starters, individuals may lack fundamental knowledge regarding their sickness and how it will affect their lives. As a result, the patient should be referred to a diabetes educator, as the American Diabetes Association recommends. This resource can assist a patient in improving their diabetes management knowledge, abilities, and confidence (“Diabetes education program,” 2021). Most significantly, the counselor can talk with the patient about the disorder’s stigmas and help them overcome them (Behavioral health and diabetes, 2021). The patient will ideally feel more capable of managing the ailment as their understanding grows. In addition, the patient should be referred to a diabetes support group that caters to people his or her age. The patient can talk about his own ideas and feelings in this group (Diabetes and mental health, 2021). Knowing that other children are suffering from the same illness as him may help the patient feel less depressed. As a result, a diabetes support counselor and a support group should be recommended.
RuBRIC:
Rubric for evaluating discussion questions
Note: Scholarly resources include evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed publications, textbooks (do not use your textbook as your only source of information), and National Standard Guidelines. Review the assignment instructions to see if there are any additional requirements that aren’t specified on the rubric.Note: Each criterion’s value on this rubric indicates a point range. (17-0 points, for example)
Rubric for Discussion Questions 100 Points
Criteria
Exceeds Expectations in Every Way
Advanced Performance Exceeds Expectations
Intermediate Requires Work
Novice
Inadequate
Points total
Initial Productivity Post Clear examples are provided, which are backed up with course content and references.
Cites three or more sources, at least one of which is a new scholarly resource not included in the course materials.
All needs for instruction have been noted.
40 out of 100
Evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role are all accurately and comprehensively represented, with explanations and application of information. To support crucial points, synthesizes course content utilizing course materials and academic resources.
All of the prerequisites in the discussion instructions are met.
It cites two sources.
35 out of 100
Components are accurate, and they are usually represented by definitions and summaries. Ideas may be exaggerated to the point of becoming irrelevant to the subject matter. Evidence-based practice, theory, and role development receive little attention. The course content is synthesised, but it lacks depth and/or development.
One of the discussion instructions’ components/requirements is missing.
One or more references are cited, however the sources do not clearly support the text.
The majority of the qualifications for instruction are listed.
31 pointsApplication of evidence-based practice, theory, or role development is not present. The content of the course is superficially synthesized.
Demonstrates a lack of preparation and/or a lack of grasp of the content.
There are no citations.
Several requirements of the instruction were not met.
Lately submits a post.
Points: 27
40Peer Response PostUses two or more scholarly references per peer post to provide both supportive and contrasting viewpoints to the conversation. The conversation is enhanced with the addition of a post.
All needs for instruction have been noted.
40 out of 100
Provides clarification and fresh information or insight linked to the subject of the peer’s contribution, demonstrating further synthesis of course content.
Course content and a minimum of one scholarly citation per peer post are used to support responses.
All needs for instruction have been noted.
35 out of 100
There isn’t enough clarity or new information. Scholarly reference backs up the peer post’s content without contributing fresh information or insight.
One peer’s post has a reference that is missing.
In terms of the quantity of reply postings, I only partially followed the guidelines.
The majority of the qualifications for instruction are listed.
Points: 31
Without further synthesis of course information, a post is primarily a compilation of peer’s posts.
Demonstrates a lack of preparation and/or a lack of grasp of the content.
The quantity of reply postings was not followed according to the guidelines.
There is a reference from a peer post that is missing.
Several requirements of the instruction were not met.
Lately submits a post.
Points: 27
40Distribution Frequency
On numerous days, the first post and peer post(s) were made.
All needs for instruction have been noted.
10 out of 10
On numerous days, the first post and peer post(s) were made.
8 out of 10
On consecutive days, make a minimum of two post options (original and/or peer).
7 out of 10
All of the posts were made on the same day.
Inadequate preparation is evident in the submission.
There was no post made.
6 out of 10
10Organization
Content that is well-organized and has a clear and comprehensive purpose statement and argument. The writing is clear and organized, with a logical flow of ideas.
5 out of 5
Content that is well-organized, with a clear purpose statement, supporting content, and a summary statement. Argument content is created with minimal content flow difficulties.
4 out of 5 stars
The lack of order and a smooth flow of ideas detracts from the substance. Narrative is difficult to follow, and readers repeatedly reread the piece.
The declaration of purpose is noted.
3 out of 5 stars
The movement of thoughts is illogical. Prose digressions. The purpose statement is ambiguous or absent.
Demonstrates a lack of preparation and/or a lack of grasp of the content.
There is no declaration of purpose.
Lately submits a task.
2 out of 10
5APA (American Psychological Association), Grammar, and Spelling
There are no mistakes in the APA formatting.
As evidenced by proper language, the writer accurately defines the reading audience (avoids jargon and simplifies complex concepts appropriately).
The writing is succinct, written in the active voice, and free of awkward transitions and conjunction overuse.
There are no mistakes in spelling, punctuation, or word usage.
5 out of 5
References are formatted correctly and consistently in APA style, and all references are cited. There should be no more than two APA errors.
In sentence structure, the writer exhibits proper use of formal English language. Readability is improved by varying sentence structure and word usage.
There are little to no problems in grammar, punctuation, or word usage.
4 out of 5 stars
There are three to four different APA formatting errors.
The writer employs incorrect language construction on occasion, as well as overuses/inappropriately employs sophisticated sentence structure. Word usage issues (evidence of inappropriate thesaurus use) and punctuation issues persist, frequently producing grammar issues. Overuse of certain words, transitional phrases, and conjunctions is common.
There are numerous grammatical, punctuation, and word usage mistakes.
3 out of 5 stars
Five or more formatting problems, or no attempt at APA formatting.
The writer’s knowledge of formal written language is minimal; his writing is informal (conforms to spoken language).
Because the writer has a restricted vocabulary and fails to communicate meaning, only the broadest, most generic messages are provided.
The punctuation and grammar are consistently bad. There are various spelling mistakes.
Lately submits a task.
2 out of 10
5 out of 100 possible points
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!