Biosecurity Biology Discussion Questions
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Assignment of Biosecurity Biology Issues
1. Non-proliferation 25 points.
Part A. What are the most important motivations that have encouraged states to develop biological weapons since their inception? How have States abandoned biological weapons since the BWC? What are the important factors? Explain why in 2001 the BWC verification methodology crashed. Explain why the US until today, after many Presidents and their administrations have come and gone, resisted the protocol? Use present and historical examples to support your thesis.
Part B. In recent years, no new countries have been added to the public lists of suspected countries or knowledge of bacterial weapons programmes. Since you all have indicated that the BWC has no teeth, what do you attribute to the restraint in the spread of biological arms between states? Wait for it to continue? Be sure to explain in such decisions the potential roles of strategy, science, arms control and standards.
2. Policy and Intelligence 25 items
Part A. What are the problems facing intelligence agencies such as inspection plans in the collection and analysis of information on state and terrorist weapons programs? To support your analysis, provide historical and present instances. Propose two ideas for improving intelligence of the United States on biological warfare and bioterrorism programmes.
Part B. What are the three most important lessons acquired from the employment of biological agents by the Rajneesh cultic in 1984 in the small town of Oregon in relation to science, medicine, public health, enforcement and home security? In what way do you think these lessons are reflected in present biodefense strategies, programs and policies?
3. Terrorism 35 items
Part A. In 2008 the Committee on the Prevention of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism wrote: “The United States should be much less concerned about the biologists, given that there is a high level of know-how to be used as an arma to cause mass casualties, and much more concerned that biologists will become terrorists.” Explain with passion why you agree with this evaluation or disagree with it.
Part B. Compare the possibility for a large-scale terrorist attack on the Metro Transit System in Washington DC, utilizing I anthrax, (ii) sarin and (iii) conventional suicide. What are the advantages and disadvantages of choosing one agent from the standpoint of a terrorist group? Talk to each agent, how the attack scenario works and how the first responders try to counter the attack.
Part C. What would a non-state actor need to I get and (ii) employ the weapons outlined above in Part B successfully? Does chemical and biological agent differ greatly that can affect the difficulty of successful acquisition and use? Be sure that obstacles are analyzed, why a certain agent may be chosen and why a certain strategy can be used to disperse during each phase of the acquisition process.
4. Future – 15 items
In the current pandemic, although not political, the media pointed out that the Trump Administration removed the Health and Security Office of the White House. Some people have alleged that this disposal resulted in the United States’ unpreparedness. But this is true?
FACTS: the staff of the National Security Council should assist the President in coordinating government response to international crises and national security issues, recognizing new challenges and ensuring the cooperation of Cabinet agencies and other ministries.
In January 2009, after Barack Obama became President, he dismissed the White House Health and Security Office that dealt with international health issues. After several concerns with the 2014 Ebola crisis, however, President Obama set up a Global Health Security and Biodefense Directorate at the NSC in 2016. This Directorate was owned by a person who reported no longer to the President but to the National Security Adviser.
This structure lasted in the early part of the Trump administration, as Rear Adm. Timothy Ziemer was in charge of the office. Following John Bolton’s arrival as National Security Advisor, he decided that the organizational chart was a muddle and led to too many conflicts. He also considered the personnel were excessively wide, with 430 persons swelling, including staff in the pipeline.
Bolton overhauled the directorate and removed several deputy national security advisers for only one. And the Global Health Directorate has been converted into a new one that focuses on counterproliferation and biodefense. Bolton felt that there was a clear overlap between arms control and non-proliferation, mass destruction weapons, terrorism, and the global health and biodefense. Morrison, who commanded the united office from July 2018 onwards, was appointed the President’s Deputy Assistant and was hence more prominent and accessible to the prior Obama directorate.
The conflicting stories between the Obama administration and Trump cannot be seen as either wholly inaccurate. The position, as established by Obama, had been divided into another entity inside the Trump administration. One might therefore technically say that the office was removed. The employee slots did not disappear, though, and the critical team mission remained a priority. You can therefore also claim that nothing has changed. The former entity is still filled in posts within the NSC and its financing has actually been expanded by Trump. Morrison answered the President directly and could bring items to his attention swiftly
Question: The real change between the administration of Obama and Trump has been philosophical. Under the Obama approach, diseases and pandemics were dealt with via international diplomacy, transparency and international cooperation as a global health issue. It was assumed that outbreaks could be prevented by increasing health care in third country countries. Under the Trump strategy, the biological health emergency epidemiology was thought to be basically the same as a bioterrorist strike. As a result, three directorates fused into a single directorate throughout 2018 to enable a fluid connection between individuals who prepare for biological hazards whether they are manufactured by humans or occur naturally.
You are now the President’s advisor, based on what you learned in the BSBD programme, which method agree with you (or maybe something different). Argue with all your enthusiasm why this should be US policy, based on your concept. How are you gonna implement your plan, who are you using as advisors (expertise and not names), and how do you retain and prioritize the National Strategic Stockpile?
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!