Assessment 1 Overview of Strategic Plan
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Assessment 1 Overview of Strategic Plan
Assessment 1 Overview of Strategic Plan
Preparations
Prepare a 3 page overview of the strategic planning process that identifies the strategic planning outcomes, describes the key components of the planning process, defines the planning schedule, and analyzes past strategies to determine reasons for success or failure.
What are the components of a strategic plan?
Why is each component important to the success of the overall plan?
Assessment Instructions
Your overview should address the following:
- Identify the strategic planning outcomes. Keep in mind that the outcomes should be specific and measurable.
- Describe the key components of the strategic planning process.
- Define the strategic planning schedule.
- Analyze past strategies to determine the reasons for their successes and failures. *Explain the strategies used in the past.
- Identify the factors that contributed to the success or failure of the strategies.
- Explain how this information can be used to improve your process as you complete the assessments in this course.
Additional Requirements
Include a title page and reference page.
Number of pages: 3, not including title page and reference page.
Number of resources: At least 3.
APA format for citations and references.
Font and spacing: Times New Roman, 12 point; double-spaced
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! Discussion Of Capital Budgeting analysis
MEMO
To:
From:
Subject: Capital Budgeting analysis
To analysis a capital investment project three widely use techniques are Net Present Value method, IRR and Payback period.
Net present value method considers time value of money while analyzing profitability of a project. All cash inflows that are likely to occur during the lifetime of the project is discounted with the company’s cost of capital to determine their present value and from this discounted present value of future inflows current cash outflow is deducted to find the net present value of the investment. If the discounted present value of inflow is higher than the present value of outflow, NPV is positive and the project is acceptable and if NPV is negative, project is not acceptable. This method has advantage of applicability in case of mutually exclusive projects and it provides present value in absolute terms. But determination of appropriate discount rate is main problem associate with this method.
The other method of analyzing investment projects is Internal Rate of Return (IRR) method. This method also considers time value of money and attempt to find the rate of return the project is generating during its lifetime. Here we find a discounting rate which equates present value of inflow with outflow or in other words which make present value of inflow equal to present outflow. The rate so determined is the rate of return which the project is expected to generate during its lifetime. Now this rate of return is compared with the company’s cost of capital to analysis the profitability of the project. If the rate of return is higher than cost of capital then the project is acceptable otherwise not.
Payback period method determines the time which is required by a project to recover its initial investment. If the period is less than the standard period then the project is acceptable otherwise not. This method has advantage of easy to use and simple to understand. Another benefit is it does not require cost of capital to make decision because it is often difficult to estimate exact cost of capital. Major drawback of payback period method is it does not consider time value of money, which is an important factor when deciding about a capital expenditure. Another problem is cash flow occurs after payback periods are not taken into account in this method.