Aspects of Ethics and Professional Codes of Conduct
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Aspects of Ethics and Professional Codes of Conduct
eader Analysis Paper – JACK MA (founder of Alibaba)
For Leader Analysis Paper #4, please submit a 4-5 page (minimum) double-spaced paper that details the following:
- Specifically, how did your leader display (or not display) aspects of Ethics and Professional Codes of Conduct (Unit 10) Lussier & Achua, Chapter 2, pages 53-61; Chapter 5, pages 178-180; take Self-Assessment 6 (pages 53-54): How Ethical is Your Behavior (for your self-awareness – not a graded assignment). PMBOK Guide, Section 1.1.3, p.3. Gebler, Creating an Ethical Culture. Jacobs, Learning How to Do The Right Thing. McDowell, Deloitte’s Three Ways to Instill Ethical Guidelines. Taylor & Moynihan, Analysing IT Ethics. PMI Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. Managing Conflict (Unit 11) Lussier & Achua, Chapter 6, pages 210-219. Leadership and the Management of Conflict at Work. Strategic Planning (Unit 12)Lussier & Achua, Chapter 11, pages 399-410. PMBOK Guide, Section 3.4.3, pp. 58-60. Jensen, Executing the Strategic Plan: Five Actions Midlevel Leaders Can Take. London & Williams, Meeting the Challenges of the Modern CIO. Additional References: Bryson, J.M. (2004). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Brown, G.B. (1996). Keeping Score: Using the Right Metrics to Drive World-Class Performance. IT Strategic Planning. and Power and Politics (Unit 13) Lussier & Achua, Chapter 5,pages 148-171. Lewis, Chapter 10. Pfeffer, Understanding Power in Organizations (a chapter from Tushman and Anderson, Managing Strategic Innovation and Change). Additional Reference: French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The Bases of Social Power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in Social Power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research. Please include citations and references to Units 10, 11, 12 and 13 reading materials that support your answers.
- How can you apply the conclusions of your assessment and analysis to leadership roles and responsibilities in your organization?
GUIDE FOR WRITING LEADER ANALYSIS Papers
FORMAT in APA format (12 font, times new roman, in text citations, proper margins, etc.)
*BEFORE YOU WRITE – Scholarly sources are PEER-REVIEWED journal articles,
- Introduction (1 paragraph)
– Intro reader to topic
– Thesis
– Preview of how the paper will flow.
- 2. DO NOT INCLUDE ALL OF THE QUESTIONS from the instructions (YOU WILL LOSE POINTS)
– Statement of main point (topic sentence)
– REMEMBER to answer the questions asked in the assignment!
– Analysis
– Statement of main point (topic sentence)
- APPLY THE COURSE MATERIALS
– Statement of main point (topic sentence)
– how does the course material apply in answering the proposed questions?
– Example of your leader effectively (or not effectively) demonstrating the concepts
– Analysis
– Remember to CITE< CITE, CITE!! CITE# your sources throughout including the course materials!!
–
- CONCLUSION/SUMMARY 1 or 2 short paragraphs
– Statement of main point (topic sentence)
– BRIEFLY summarize your thoughts including how the course material applied or did not apply to how your leader did (or did not) use or demonstrate the concepts
- REFERENCE PAGE
-APA format listing all of your sources
-include the text books from the course (*hint-the books are listed in APA format on the syllabus)
- PROOFREAD
-Does what you said make sense?
-Are there typos?
-Read it outloud . . . is it logical?
- FOLLOW the instructions, paper should not be more than the page limits! 4-6 pages for most assignments (read the instructions).
Textbooks and other Course Materials
Required Textbooks:
Bradberry, T. & Greaves, J. (2009). Emotional intelligence 2.0. San Diego: TalentSmart.
Kotter, John P. (2012). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Lewis, James P. (2003). Project leadership. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lussier, R.N & Achua, C.F. (2012). Leadership: Theory, application, & skill development
(5th Ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning (E-Textbook)
Project Management Institute (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK
Guide), 6th Ed. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute, Inc.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!