ASCI 530-Unmanned Aerospace Systems
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
ASCI 530-Unmanned Aerospace Systems
1
Add title of your project
Title of Project
Your Name
ASCI 530 – Unmanned Aerospace Systems
Research Project
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide
Date
Abstract Comment by Brent: Here are some reference for writing an abstract (when it comes time for it): https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/95a6/f77af294ad3a3f4cdb42159c20f192a552ae.pdf apa style guide writing effective abstracts
Describe the purpose of this paper (start with your accepted conceptual overview and adapt to identify key elements, such as purpose, high-level support/observations, and findings from conduct of the research; remember to remove all reference citations and define all acronyms [redefine them in the body of the paper]).
Keywords: Add appropriate keywords here
Summary Comment by Brent: See the following resource for the general formatting of a paper: Purdue Online Writing Lab – General APA Guidelines
Add into material here. Describe the relevancy and background of this project and how it relates to unmanned aerospace (aircraft or spacecraft) systems (UAS). The intent of this project is to demonstrate an understanding of the course topics by analyzing, evaluating, and developing recommendations for addressing an issue associated with UAS design, operations, or regulation. You will need to identify the underlying issue or problem to be addressed (associated with current, emerging, or conceptual UAS uses). Ensure you provide sufficient detail to support performance of the following: Comment by Brent: Avoid an informal or narrative tone. Instead focus on use of formal tone in academic writing: See the following resources for further advice on writing tone: Use Appropriate Academic Language Basics of Scholarly Voice Grossmont College – Advice on Academic Tone Avoid self-referencing in academic writing (e.g., I, me, myself, etc…)
- Identify a perceived issue or problem (i.e., airspace challenges) associated with UAS design, operations, or regulations and to the learning outcomes;
- Identify what research design you plan to use and rationale supporting use (see the following for examples: 12 Major Types of Research Designs)
- Establish a sufficient and brief summary of the issue or problem; and
- Provide an accurate, coherent and brief representation containing the concept, characteristics, results and conclusions.
Make sure you support any assertions or identification of “facts” with relevant and credible reference citations. It is important to make sure this section provides an effective summary and develops a coherent, central theme that is supported in a well-structured, organized, and logically-consistent manner throughout. Comment by Brent: Add a supporting citation to every sentence that is not entirely your own observation. It is good practice to use supporting citations as it lends credibility to what you are stating. Add citations throughout document when you state something that is not your own original thought. If you do not cite a source and it is not your original thought it is PLAGIARISM.
Issue (or Problem) Statement
Discuss and list different sources supporting your central concept, as well as identifying applicability found from your literature review. Make sure this section comprehensively identifies and isolates one specific problem, identifies factors contributing to the problem with accurate details, and substantiates problem statement with external source(s; i.e., citations). This section should be limited to one to three paragraphs
Significance of the Issue (or Problem)
Add information relating to identifying the significance of the greater problem or issue here. Treat this section as the “literature review;” accordingly it should be used to clearly establish the significance of the problem statement, present a strong, well-supported argument based on relevant concepts, theories, and frameworks, and present accurate outcome predictions that support immediate action to resolve the problem. The majority of your evidence indicating the background of the topic will appear here; it is recommended you use relevant subcategories/subsections, as appropriate. For example:
Background
Discuss the background of the issue; expand beyond the brief introduction and problem statement above. Include historical narrative of what has led to and continues to contribute toward the problem; observable effects; perceived results, if left untreated; and further rationale supporting investigation.
Related Research and Development
Discuss who has engaged in similar research; what were their results/findings; have any innovative or possible useful solutions been proposed; what has limited their success in addressing the problem?
Technological Advancements
Discuss other technological areas with the potential to address the problem; does this technology require adaptation or modification; what are the costs or requirements to use; what is the state of the technology and can it be expected to help address the entire issue or a portion of the greater problem?
Include any relevant figures or tables to communicate your design; all figures should follow their in-text reference, not precede (in-text reference is always required).
Figure X. Description phrase to be used as title and description. [If not original] Reprinted [or adapted] from Title (page number), by Author first initial. Second initial. Surname, year, place of publication: Publisher. Copyright [Year] by the Name. Comment by Brent: See the following for APA formatting of Figure captions: http://libguides.gwumc.edu/c.php?g=27779&p=170358
Alternative Actions
Add information relating to two possible solutions to the issue, breakup into relevant subcategories/subsections. This section should present a realistic approach to resolving the problem. Reasons for each alternative should be clearly articulated, advantages and disadvantages should be thoughtful and give cause for reflection on the results of implementing one or the other alternative action, and a decision could be made solely based upon the information provided.
Recommendations
Specify a specific recommendation (whether one of the two+ presented under alternative actions or a hybrid approach). This section should present a creative approach to resolving the problem. Reason is clearly out of the ordinary, advantages and disadvantages should be thought provoking, and it should answer the question “What if we tried something completely different?”
Conclusion
Add a description that ties together everything you have covered from a high level and discuss any further recommendations you have based on your findings and/or experience developing this design (e.g., need for follow on research).
References Comment by Brent: See the following list for APA formatting of required references: Purdue Online Writing Lab – Reference List: Author/Authors
Add relevant reference citations that support your work, including any assertions or identification of “facts.”
This paper must feature the use of proper APA citations and references; be grammatically-sound and free of spelling errors, follow required formatting rules; and fully address the given assignment.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!