Application of Theoretical Foundations Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Application of Theoretical Foundations Assignment
CJ598
Week 2 Assignment
After completing the Reading for this unit, develop a 15-20 slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the application of theoretical foundations to current knowledge and practice in emergency management. Select three of the theories listed below and consider how each informs our efforts in homeland security and/or emergency management.
Complexity Theory
Risk Perception Theory
Systems Theory
Vulnerability Theory
Apply the three selected theories to existing policies and procedures in emergency management and/or homeland security and analyze recommendations for improvement. Include the following:
An overview of each of the selected theories and their relevance to the practice of homeland security and/or emergency management.
An application of each of the selected theories to real-world examples of efforts related to homeland security and/or emergency management (such as phases of the EM cycle, counterterrorism efforts, etc.) and the established policies and procedures utilized in those efforts.
An analysis and evaluation of the effectiveness of the selected efforts within the context of the theories applied and established policies and procedures.
Recommendations for the continued application of theoretical foundations to emergency management knowledge, doctrine, and practice.
Be sure to write in a scholarly and objective tone, avoiding the use of first person, personal pronouns, contractions, and colloquial or conversational language. Use citations from scholarly, peer-reviewed sources throughout to support your content and credit sources of information and ideas.
Note: This assignment requires outside research. Use at least four scholarly, peer-reviewed sources in addition to the Reading material throughout your assignment to support your content and credit sources of information and ideas.
Develop your presentation using bullet points of main ideas on the slides themselves, and use the speaker notes to fully develop the analysis and evaluation component. The speaker notes must be presented in complete sentences. All content — whether on the slides or in the speaker notes — must be properly cited per APA. The use of images or graphics is permitted, but they must be properly cited. Avoid using copyrighted material, such as organizational logos, etc. Select a basic slide design for use throughout the presentation. Maintain a scholarly and objective tone, avoiding the use of first person, personal pronouns, contractions, and colloquial or casual language. Use citations from scholarly, peer-reviewed
sources (a minimum of four in addition to the Reading) throughout to support your content and credit sources of information and ideas.
This is the response given to the problem statement from Week 1 from the professor:
You have a good start here. However, you need to be careful about your use of sources and citations. The Phoenix task force was created in 2013. As such, the source you cite as having commented on the challenges faced by the Phoenix task force cannot have written about it in 2012, when it did not yet exist. In addition, that source makes no mention of this task force specifically. It is important that you are not misattributing content to sources in your citations. Note also that the research must focus on addressing the problem – such as overcoming challenges – rather than simply identifying what those challenges are. As you continue to revise this, be sure you are clearly articulating a focused approach to research that can address the problem.
Please double-check all cited sources to make sure the dates line up with the facts of The Phoenix Task Force. Thank you.
Directions
Your 15-20 slide requirement is excluding your title, introduction, and reference slides.
Use one basic slide design and layout.
Text large enough to be read by your audience (font size 20-34 point).
Limit slides to between 6 and 8 lines of content.
You may use pictures, charts and graphs to supplement your material as long as they do not take up the entire slide
Use bullets for your main points.
Use speaker notes to fully explain what is being discussed in the bullet points as though you are presenting to an audience, being sure to follow the Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.).
Viewpoint and purpose should be clearly established and sustained.
Presentation should be well ordered, logical and unified, as well as original and insightful.
Your work should display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics
Appropriate citation style should be followed
You should also make sure to:
Use examples to support your discussion
Cite all sources on a separate reference slide at the end of your PowerPoint and reference and cite within the body of the presentation using APA format and citation style. For more information on APA guidelines, visit Academic Tools.
Directions for Submitting Your Assignment
Compose your assignment and save it in the following format: Course#_LastnameFirstname Unit # Assignment (example: HM598_SmithJohn Unit 1 Assignment). Submit your assignment to the appropriate Dropbox by the end of the unit.
Example of Good Per Reviews you can use:
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!