Analysis on the Demand of Top Talent
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Analysis on the Demand of Top Talent Introduction in Big Data and Cloud Computing Field in China Based on 3-F Method
Zhao Linjia, Huang Yuanxi, Wang Yinqiu, Liu Jia
National Academy of Innovation Strategy, China Association for Science and Technology, Beijing, P.R.ChinaAbstractBig data and cloud computing, which can help China to implement innovation-driven development strategy and promote industrial transformation and upgrading, is a new and emerging industrial field in China. Educated, productive and healthy workforces are necessary factor to develop big data and cloud computing industry, especially top talents are essential. Therefore, a three-step method named 3-F has been introduced to help describing the distribution of top talents globally and making decision whether they are needed in China. The 3-F method relies on calculating the brain gain index to analysis the top talent introduction demand of a country. Firstly, Focus on the high-frequency keywords of a specific field by retrieving the highly cited papers. Secondly, using those keywords to Find out the top talents of this specific field in the Web of Science. Finally, Figure out the brain gain index to estimate whether a country need to introduce top talents of a specific field abroad. The result showed that the brain gain index value of China’s big data and cloud computing field was 2.61, which means China need to introduce top talents abroad. Besides P. R. China, those top talents mainly distributed in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Netherlands and France.
INTRODUCTION
Big data and cloud computing is a new and emerging industrial field[1], and increasing widely used in China[2-4]. Talents experience is a source of technological mastery[5], essentially for developing and using big data technologies. Most European states consider the immigration of foreign workers as an important factor to decelerate the decline of national workforces[6]. Lots of universities and research institutes have set up undergraduate and/or postgraduate courses on data analytics for cultivating talents[7]. EMC corporation think that vision, talent, and technology are necessary elements to providing solutions to big data management and analysis, insuring the big data success[8].
Bibliometrics research has appeared as early as 1917[9], and has been proved an effective method for assessing or identifying talents. Based on analyses of publication volume, journals and their impact factors, most cited articles and authors, preferred methods, and represented countries, Gallardo-Gallardo et. al[10] assess whether talent management should be approached as an embryonic, growth, or mature phenomenon.
In this paper, we intend to analysis whether China need to introduce top talents in the field of big data and cloud computing by using bibliometrics. In section 2, the 3-F method
for top talent introduction demand analysis will be discussed. In section 3, we will analysis the demand of top talent introduction in big data and cloud computing field in China.METHOD
In general, metering indicators contain the most productive authors, journals, institutions, and countries, and the collaboration networks between authors and institutions[11, 12]. Based on the commonly used bibliometrics method, 3-F method for top talent introduction demand analysis is proposed. 3-F method has three steps:
Firstly, searching the literature database and forming a high-impact literature collection in a specific field. Focusing on the high-frequency keywords in the high-impact literature collection by using the text analysis method as the research hotspots. Just to be clear, the high-impact literature refers to the journal literature whose number of cited papers ranked in the top 1% in the same discipline and in the same year.
Secondly, retrieving those keywords in the Web of Science to find out where those top talents of this specific field are. Find the top talents by collected the information about talents country distribution, the institutions distribution and so on through the high-impact literature collection. Among them, the top talent refers to the first author or the communication author of the high-impact literatures.
Finlly, Figure out the brain gain index to determine the top talents introduction demand of a certain country. The brain gain index is calculated as following formulas:
Iik = (Twk / Tik) / (Pw / Pi) (1)
Among them, Iik means the brain gain index value of country (i) in the field (k), Twk means the number of worlds top talents in the field (k), Tik means the number of countrys (i) top talents in the field (k), Pw means the world population, Pi means the countrys (i) population. If Iik was more than 1, that means the country (i) has less top talents in the field (k), therefore the talent introduction demand will be relatively strong. In contrast, if Iik was less than 1, that means the countrys (i) has greater top talents in the field (k) than the world average, and the talent introduction demand will not be so strong.
Additionally, the literature information mainly from the ISI Web of Science (SCI, CPCI-S), and the the data analysis and visualization tools are TDA and Tableau.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!