Analysis of the Leadership Conflict in the Guardians of the Galaxy
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Watch Guardians of the Galaxy in preparation for this task (2014).
This isn’t a group project. It must be filled out and sent separately. Make sure to analyze the film that was given to you. You will receive a zero if you use a different film or your in-class group. You must type your analysis. Determine the question number and the question, and then respond succinctly to each question. Please follow the format outlined below. Demonstrate that you have a thorough understanding of these principles and can spot them in action. Use a different format than an essay. I will not read it if you submit it in essay format, and you will receive a zero.
Always utilize the same group for all of your analyses (this means that all group members must not only be discussed but be part of the group from beginning to end). Individuals who are not actually members of the group should not be included, and groups should not be switched between. Do not retell the story.In your study, do not include any form of cinematic criticism. It makes no difference to me whether you like the film or not. Films are not made for the sake of amusement. If you mention how much you enjoy or detest the film in your critique, 10% of the total points available will be subtracted. This includes describing any of the film’s logistical issues (actor names, director, date, etc). The title of the film and the names of the characters in your group must be included, but no additional details from the film should be included.
Answer the questions below in the following format. Include the questions and use the proper numbers. On the rubric, point values for each question have been identified. Use a different format than an essay. I will not read it if you submit it in essay format, and you will receive a zero. To distinguish between question and response, questions must be bolded.
Consider the following example: Problem Solving 1:
a. Define Problem Solving in your own words.
Answer: a. I’m not going to give you a solution, but you should be able to tell that the answer differs significantly from the question.
b. Identify a specific scene in which the group had to solve an issue, as well as the problem that needed to be solved.
Answer: b. I’m not going to give you an answer, but you should be able to tell that the answer differs significantly from the question.
c. Describe how the group came up with a solution to the challenge. Explain each step of the procedure, including who was involved and the final result.
Answer: c. I’m not going to give you an answer, but you should be able to tell that the answer differs significantly from the question.
This task has a point value of 130. A ten percent penalty will be applied if the questions and answers are not typed as in the example above. Do not employ the essay structure once more. Each question should be answered separately and identified by number and letter.
(Questions that aren’t included and/or are typed in bold = -10%)
If you don’t type your analysis, it won’t be accepted. Assignments that are late or emailed will not be accepted.
I propose that you submit your analysis at least two days before the deadline so that you have time to correct any errors. There will be no exceptions or late entries.Answer the questions below based on what you saw in the film Guardians of the Galaxy for this assignment (2014).
1. Choose a group to work with in your analysis.
a. The title of the film and the name of the band
b. Members of the Group (Include all group members)
c. Describe how each group member meets the criteria for inclusion in the group (three or more interdependent persons working toward a similar goal).
2. Leadership 1: a. Define leadership in your own words.
b. Recognize and define a specific leadership style shown in the movie.
c. Describe a circumstance in which the aforementioned leadership style was demonstrated.
d. Describe how the aforesaid leadership style was demonstrated in the scene and how it impacted the group.
3. Leadership 2: a. Identify and define the film’s second specific leadership style.
b. Describe a specific incident in which the aforementioned leadership style was demonstrated.
c. Describe how the aforesaid leadership style was demonstrated in the scene and how it affected the group.
4. Conflict 1: a. Define conflict in your own words.
b. Describe a specific scene in which the group was clearly divided.
c. Describe how the group dealt with the disagreement. Include the members of the group’s conflict styles and conflict resolution styles.
d. Describe the impact of the conflict and its settlement on the group.
5. Disagreement 2: a. Identify a second specific scene in which the group was in conflict.
b. Describe how the group dealt with the issue. Include the members of the group’s conflict styles and conflict resolution styles.
c. Describe the impact of the conflict and its settlement on the group.
6. Problem Solving 1: a. Define Problem Solving in your own words.
b. Identify a specific scene in which the group had to solve an issue, as well as the problem that needed to be solved.
c. Describe how the group came up with a solution to the challenge. Explain each step of the procedure, including who was involved and the final result.
7. Solving Issues 2:
a. Identify a second specific scene in which the group had to solve an issue, as well as the problem that needed to be solved.
b. Describe how the group came up with a solution to the challenge. Explain each step of the procedure, including who was involved and the final result.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!