Analysis of Liver Diseases in United States
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Analysis of Liver Diseases in United States
Analysis, Liver, Diseases, United, States
Introduction:
Liver diseases are of three types which can occur due to the consumption of alcohol such as fatty liver, alcoholic hepatitis, and cirrhosis. But fatty liver has become please check grammar common nowadays and its cases are increasing day by day in the United States. (White, 2012). (Please check grammar)
But unlike other liver diseases, it is reversible and it can be treated by quitting alcohol consumption. Fatty liver has become quite common among persons who frequently consume alcohol because liver and git are the main sites in our body where alcohol is metabolized. There are two pathways of alcohol metabolism in our body: alcohol dehydrogenase, cytochrome p450 (Moriya, 2015). No effective introduction
Methodology:
Method: I need effective detail on methods
Copy material from given sample assignment
Three papers were selected and then evaluated to explain the NHMRC form. In this article, bias, confounding factors, clinical factors, and acceptability have been included. This article includes the CASP framework with a checklist that can explain and support the questions. Need to change the line or words and add author otherwise it showing similarity
Search strategy:
(Copy material from given sample assignment) before starting critical appraisal, i thoroughly read the articles and research questions to identify the relation between alcohol consumption and fatty liver. Systematic reviews apply strategies to eliminate bias and random errors. Evidence uses rigorous methodology and designs (white, 2012).
Databases:
The databases include (1) google scholar (2) Medline via PubMed (3) ProQuest. I studied 160 articles, out of which i have selected three articles that are most compatible with the research question.
Keywords:
Search terms used in the article include: copy same words from another assignment
- fatty liver
- alcohol consumption
- alcoholic fatty liver
- liver diseases
- chronic liver diseases
- elevated liver enzymes
Inclusion criteria:
The inclusion criteria of these articles include thoroughly studied articles, academic research papers that were published in the English language in the last ten years. Copy these words from other assignment
Results:
Table 1 cross-sectional study:
“Prevalence of alcoholic fatty liver disease among adults in united states, 2001-2016”
Critical appraisal questions
Underline your answer
- Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined?
Yes
Evidence: it was clearly defined as cross-sectional study was performed and individuals were selected after proper interview and examination. No proper details regarding inclusion for selected study.
Critical appraisal questions
Underline your answer
- Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?
Yes
Evidence: copy these words from other assignment the study subjects and setting were described in detail as it showed that the data was collected from 2001 to 2016. So extensive study was done to perform this research. About 70.3% individuals were selected after interview and 67.2% individuals were selected after examination.
Critical appraisal questions
Underline your answer
- Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way?
Yes
Evidence: the exposure was also measured in a reliable way as the age of patients was taken into account and elevated liver enzyme levels such as alt, ast was also considered. The study was conducted on the persons who had a past history of alcohol consumption in the 12 months.
Critical appraisal questions
Underline your answer
- Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?
Yes
Evidence: the objectives of this study were clearly defined as the number of deaths caused by alcohol fatty liver has been increased to a great extent. So, this study was conducted to know about the prevalence of alcoholic fatty liver in us adults.
(Where is objective and standard criteria?)
Critical appraisal questions
Underline your answer
- Were confounding factors identified?
No
Evidence: the confounding factors were not identified to perform this study because only alcohol was taken into account. Need to address confounding factors
Critical appraisal questions
Underline your answer
- Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated?
No
Evidence: the confounding factors were not considered to perform this study so the strategies to deal with confounding factors were not stated.
Critical appraisal questions
Underline your answer
- Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way?
Yes
Evidence: the outcomes of this study were measured properly as this study was performed on 34,243 individuals and statistical analysis was done to obtain results. Need more detail
Critical appraisal questions
Underline your answer
- Was appropriate statistical analysis used?
Yes
Evidence: yes, proper statistical analysis was performed to obtain its results. Multivariable logistic regression was used to know about the prevalence of alcoholic fatty liver among adults in us. (Wong et. Al. 2019)
Reference
Wong, t., dang, k., ladhani, s., singal, a. K., & wong, r. J. (2019). Prevalence of alcoholic fatty liver disease among adults in the United States, 2001-2016. Jama, 321(17), 1723-1725.
Table 2 case-control study:
“Amount and duration of alcohol intake as risk factors of symptomatic liver cirrhosis: a case control study”
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!