an opinionated, holistic perspective on psychoactive substances
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Assignment #5 100 points
_______________________________________________
Psychoactive substances have a well-articulated position, so to speak.
In the early stages of the course, you are acquainted with several informational resources, each of which contextualizes the fact that psychoactive substance usage is a big problem in the United States. A number of brief essays of which you have produced in order to highlight distinct substances and aspects of usage are available in your portfolio. In this project, you will learn how to synthesize your views, attitudes, and understanding based on these experiences into a cohesive “summary.”
Your task: A non-partisan think organization has hired you to develop a position statement on psychoactive substances in the United States. This information will be circulated to elected officials, the media, law enforcement, health authorities, and any other interested parties. The statement’s objective is to inspire a paradigm shift, that is, to offer a fresh perspective on psychoactive substances or, alternatively, to provide an alternative way of thinking about psychoactive substances. Find an example of each of these on the back side of this form.
For the United States, the psychoactive substance of most importance is LSD. Decide on one.
What tactics do we currently employ in using that substance?
To what substance, if any, do you recommend new approaches be implemented?
What You Need to Submit: This assignment should be a minimum of 1,250 words. Grading: Thorough examination of the issue 80 points – Part One (Selection of Most Important) (20) – Part Two (Current Strategies) (30) – Part Three (New Strategies) (30) Grammar/Spelling/Length 20 points
Make this your most important assignment: briefly describe the most important substance. Selecting a particular drug (e.g., cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana, etc.) that you believe is critical to address is what I’m looking for here. So, go on and explain why it is of critical importance. If you utilize the marijuana metaphor, it may be helpful to rephrase it: “Marijuana is the most important substance to address in the United States since it is the most contentious of laws.” That means the area where state and federal governments clash the most.
and, in addition, explain to me how you arrived at this solution (i.e., the standard that you used to determine this).
provide several instances
current marketing strategies Prior to our present techniques (such as MLDA 21, drug scheduling, warning labeling on cigarette packages, etc.) addressing the material, there are one or two options to consider (such as MLDA 21, drug scheduling, warning labeling on cigarette packages, etc.). Once that’s done, make them related to the problem you discovered in the first section of the assignment. As an example, federal law classifies marijuana as having no recognised medical applications. As a result, it will be impossible for the FDA to ever approve a product as a drug made from a plant material. Although the federal government has not yet sued Colorado and Washington to demand a change in their state laws, this swiftly is becoming a legislation without teeth, as it has no impact on the federal governmentCurrent strategies have been found to be ineffective.
To ensure that you identify the content accurately, tie your strategy to it. That substance’s usage will be either helped or hindered by your technique.
Use of the chemical can’t be prevented using present tactics, thus show why you say no strategy has been effective.New techniques From your previous assignments, everyone of you now has the ability to give sensible new approaches. Think outside the box! A new idea should be introduced. For instance: “Some states may choose to implement a rule that forces current nonviolent drug offenders to serve their whole sentences on probation while performing supervised, skill-specific occupations that generate money that will be deducted and pooled to cover the monetary loss caused by drug use.
[There are] two possible reasons why people in the US would support this strategy: (i.e., it appears to respect individual rights). There are two possible reasons why people in the US might oppose this strategy: (i.e., it doesn’t appear to respect individual rights) (i.e., it might not be cost-effective).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|