AHS 7615 Medical Amachi and The Children of Prisoners Case -

December 27, 2022

AHS 7615 Medical Amachi and The Children of Prisoners Case

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

AHS 7615 Medical Amachi and The Children of Prisoners Case

Read the case study included in the learning resources, entitled: The Least of These – Amachi and the Children of Prisoners.

Please complete a reaction paper addressing the following questions about the case study:

What does the word Amachi mean?

What is the mission/focus of the program?

What is the program’s slogan?

What faith-based and secular organizations did the program partner with?

Where did the program receive its funding from?

What management challenges arose that impacted their partnerships?

What was the biggest task the program faced during its initial launch? Explain your rationale.

What public policy decisions were sparked as a result of the Amachi program?

What later impacted the success of the program?

What behaviors do you believe are needed to further build the Amachi Program and move it in a positive direction? Please be specific.

261

Promoting Health Care Quality Discussion Project

Project: Promoting Health Care Quality

With the recognition of the bidirectional link between quality and finance in a healthcare organization, it follows that any changes to one can have an echo in the other. To determine the net result of a change in overall performance status of the organization, one must determine the point where the results of echoes will reach equilibrium.
—Sadeghi, Barzi, Mikhail, & Shabot, 2013
This week you have been examining evaluation tools and how they can be used as part of a plan to promote quality and safety. As you develop an evaluation plan for your Course Project, consider the insights you have gained through your analysis of your selected organization, as well as the highly regulated and competitive health care environment.

To prepare:

Review the information on evaluation, including data representation and quality monitoring, presented in the Learning Resources.

Review your work on the Course Project thus far, particularly Sections 3 and 4.

Think about how your quality improvement initiative could be evaluated. Consider the following:

Which stakeholders need information related to this initiative? What do they need this information for?

How would you assess the outcomes in the short-term and long-term?

How would you analyze related processes, including but not limited to the one you redesigned in Section 4?

How should an analysis of organizational structures be integrated into your evaluation?

How would you identify and evaluate any unintended consequences that may arise?

What metrics should the organization use to gauge progress and the effectiveness of the quality improvement initiative? How would these metrics incorporate the measures and indicators that you identified in Section 3? Are there additional measures and indicators that you now think should be included?

How should the organization track and display data for an interdisciplinary audience? How could the use of a dashboard or balanced scorecard be of value?

How could the organization create an integrated view of performance that links finance and quality?

To complete:

Develop a 2- to 3-page evaluation plan that includes the following:

An outline of the methods that you would propose for evaluating the quality improvement initiative and the financial implications

A description of specific metrics that integrate your previously identified measures and indicators and any others that you have deemed important

A recommendation of how the organization could represent data related to this quality improvement issue for ongoing monitoring and to determine the value or success of the initiative

An explanation of how the organization could create an integrated view of performance that links finance and quality

This Assignment is due by Day 7 of Week 10.

An organization’s ability to learn, and translate that learning into action rapidly is the ultimate competitive advantage.
—Jack Welch as quoted by Kerrigan
Think back to when you first identified the quality improvement issue for your Course Project. What insights related to quality measurement, improvement strategies, and evaluation have you gained since then? How have these insights informed your view of the issue and shaped your understanding of how to promote positive outcomes for your selected organization? How would you suggest the organization proceed based on the outcomes of your investigation?

In this section of the Course Project, you synthesize your analysis and recommendations into an action plan for implementing the quality improvement initiative.

To prepare:

Begin to develop a plan for implementing your quality improvement initiative, including the redesigned process that you identified in Section 3. Consider the following:

How would you undertake the process of determining a timeline for planning, implementing, and evaluating this quality improvement plan?

What are some reasonable milestones for this initiative? What are the daily, weekly, monthly steps/goals?

262

Contributions of Ukelele in The Music Industry Discussion

Criterion 1: NWS-2: Increase the proportion of schools that offer nutritious foods and beverages outside of school meals.

One objective was chosen from Exhibit 10.1 in Chapter 10 of the textbook.

Criteria 2
Criterion 2: Determine whether your intervention will apply at the local, state or federal level.	Writer determines the local, state, or federal entity the intervention will be presented to.


Criterion 3: Research and current laws	Includes all of the following elements: ● Research current laws pertaining to the chosen objective. ● Research of past laws pertaining to the chosen objective. ● Research that would assist in the proposed changes to address the health problem.


Criterion 4: Proposal outline components	Proposal outline includes all three of the following components of the intervention: ● Financing ● Economical ● Policy information of the objective by pitching it to your chosen government entity.


Criterion 5: Academic references with in-text citations.	● Includes four academic references from multiple outside sources and/or course materials as required.

Criterion 6: Writing Requirements

All of the following elements are met:
● Displays college-level writing in Standard English free of spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors.
● Minimal in-text citation errors such as a missing page number or a misplaced date may occur.
● Minimal paper formatting errors such as a misplaced margin may occur.
● Quotation marks and citations make authorship clear.
● Assignment is 3-4 pages in length not including the title page and reference page.

HA415_1904B_-6.1: Explain healthcare financing and economic principles as they apply to healthcare policymaking.

Student work indicates an advanced ability to explain health care financing and economic principles as they apply to healthcare policymaking.

RUBRIC

QUALITY OF RESPONSE	NO RESPONSE	POOR / UNSATISFACTORY	SATISFACTORY	GOOD	EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)	Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.	20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.	30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.	40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.	50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).	Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.	5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6^th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.	10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6^th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.	15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6^th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.	20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6^th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)	Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.	5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors	10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors	15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.	20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)	Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.	3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6^th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6^th edition requirements whatsoever.	5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6^th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper	7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.	10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6^th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.

GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER

CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow

Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!