AHIMA Code of Ethics Responses Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
AHIMA Code of Ethics Responses Essay
Hi, please, respond to peers in about 75 words minimum.
PEER 1
Thank you for your discussion this week You highlighted the importance of ethical data security. With the increase in consumer interaction with personal health information, as well as the necessity for patients to be more active in their treatment plans, the confidentiality, integrity, and accessibility of PHI is imperative to enhance quality of care. According to Cote (2021) some key principles of data ethics include:
Ownership: respecting the fact that people have the ultimate ownership of their own PHI. Use of any of this information without prior consent and knowledge of terms and conditions of data sharing and utilization is unethical.
Transparency: concise explanation of how data gathered will be processed to create information that lend to the development of initiative that improve quality of care.
protect personally identifiable information (PII) from being misused or breached.
Intention: ensuring that use of sensitive patient data has no malintent.
Outcomes: utilizing data management tools such as artificial intelligence and machine learning with focus on eliminating any bias that may result in disparities.
These principles coincide with the second and sixth principles from the AHIMA Code of Ethics. HIM professionals will effectively analyze, manage, and secure patients’ PII for the purpose of enhancing the quality of care overall.
Reference
Cote, C. (2021, March 16). 5 principles of data ethics for business. Business Insights Blog. Retrieved February 14, 2022, from https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/data-ethics
PEER 2:
The AHIMA code of ethics set principles that obligate HIM professionals to demonstrate actions that reflect its values. the purpose of the principles is for the professionals to promote high standards of HIM practice that includes Protection of privacy and security of health information: appropriately disclose health information, collection, use, and maintenance of health information and ensuring accessibility and integrity of health information. The code identifies the core values on which the HIM mission is based for instant, knowing and understanding what the organization stands for and what it works towards ( AHIMA,1998). The code establishes a set of ethical principle that are used in decision-making and action for instance, the HIM professional can deliver high-quality services and products from health information exchange. The code helps with the establishment of a framework for professional behavior and responsibilities when professional obligation conflict or ethical uncertainty arise for instance, when if a provider is HIV positive and during procedure accidentally infected the patient with HIV. Such dilemma requires the HIM professional to determine the most ethical and appropriate way of handling both patient right to privacy especially individual with HIV as the law mandates. The ethics mentors’ new providers to the field to HIM mission, values, and ethical principles such record confidentiality in psychotherapy notes and engage in
recruitment and mentorship of student, staff, peer, and colleagues to develop and strengthen professional workforce. The ethics empowers the public by providing ethical principles to hold HIM professional accountable such as respect the inherent dignity and worth of every person and represent the professional in a positive manner (AHIMA, 2019).
My major takeaway as HIM profession is that the code of AHIMA code of ethics serves the goals of its members by strengthening the HIM professional’s efforts to improve overall quality of healthcare. It also provides a platform for peer review especially when there is inappropriate conduct or adverse legal, regulatory or credential if actions that are described in the AHIMA code of ethics.
Ref:
AHIMA. (1998). AHIMA’s Directional Strategies: Values, Vision, and Mission.” (Resolution from the 1997 House of Delegates) Journal of AHIMA 69, no. https://bok.ahima.org/doc?oid=58875#.YgheTy9OmfA
AHIMA. (2019). AHIMA code of ethics. https://bok.ahima.org/doc?oid=105098#.YghdVi9OmfA
HCAD 640 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION- Organizational Costing and Profit Analysis (100 words minimum)
PEER 3: Generally, the idea that a healthcare organization’s financial health and quality of care are correlated makes sense. Generally, et al. (2021) reasons that each can improve the other, for example a healthcare organization that is known for providing superior healthcare would see more patients and be more profitable. On the other hand, a healthcare organization that is financially healthy may be able to afford better resources in the way of machines or staff, thus improving the level of care that can be offered (Generally, et al. 2021).
Akinleye, et al. (2019) notes that the opposite of these situations may also be true, where healthcare organizations under financial pressure will in turn struggle to keep top talent or even adequate staff which can directly lead to patient safety concerns when available providers are spread too thin and mistakes are more likely to occur. Akinleye, et al. (2019) notes a clear correlation between financial health of a healthcare organization and the quality of care the organization provides. One of the reasons Akinleye, et al. (2019) identifies as contributing to this correlation is that healthcare organizations that are financially healthy are in the best position to provide reliable care and maintain the necessary systems and equipment.
References
Akinleye, D. D., McNutt, L.-A., Lazariu, V., & McLaughlin, C. C. (2019). Correlation between hospital finances and quality and safety of patient care. PLoS ONE, 14(8), 1–19. https://doi-org.ezproxy.umgc.edu/10.1371/journal.pone.0219124
Generally, K., Ko cot, E., Tambor, M., & Quentin, W. (2021). The association between hospital financial performance and the quality of care—a scoping review protocol. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 1–6. https://doi-org.ezproxy.umgc.edu/10.1186/s13643-021-01778-3
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!