Agroecology: An Alternative Model for Sustainable Agriculture
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Agroecology: An Alternative Model for Sustainable Agriculture
Agroecology is a holistic and multidisciplinary approach to agriculture that emphasizes the interdependence of plants, animals, humans, and the environment. It seeks to maximize the efficiency of natural resources and ecosystem services, minimize the use of external inputs, and enhance the resilience and diversity of agroecosystems. The principles of agroecology are rooted in the knowledge and practices of small-scale farmers, indigenous communities, and local food systems, and they offer an alternative to the dominant model of industrial agriculture.
Agroecology recognizes the importance of traditional knowledge and biodiversity in sustainable agriculture. It promotes the use of agrobiodiversity, which refers to the variety of plant and animal species and genetic resources used in agriculture, and the preservation of traditional farming practices that have proven to be successful in particular regions or ecosystems. This approach can lead to the development of locally adapted and resilient agroecosystems that are less vulnerable to climate change, pests, and diseases.
Agroecology also emphasizes the importance of soil health and fertility management. It encourages the use of organic and agroforestry techniques that build up soil organic matter, enhance nutrient cycling, and reduce soil erosion. This not only benefits crop productivity but also helps to mitigate the impacts of climate change by sequestering carbon in the soil.
Another key principle of agroecology is the integration of crops and livestock. This can lead to greater efficiency in the use of resources, as animal manure can be used as a natural fertilizer for crops, while crop residues and agroforestry products can be used as feed for livestock. This integration can also lead to more diverse and resilient agroecosystems that better mimic natural ecosystems.
Agroecology also emphasizes the importance of social and economic equity in agricultural production. It seeks to empower small-scale farmers, indigenous communities, and women farmers by providing access to land, credit, knowledge, and markets. This can lead to more inclusive and diverse food systems that benefit local communities, reduce poverty, and promote social justice.
Despite the many benefits of agroecology, there are also challenges to its implementation. The dominant model of industrial agriculture, with its focus on large-scale monoculture production, has led to the development of infrastructure, policies, and markets that are not supportive of small-scale agroecological production. There are also challenges related to knowledge and education, as many farmers may not be aware of agroecological practices or have the resources to implement them. In addition, there may be resistance from agribusinesses and other stakeholders who benefit from the current model of agriculture.
To overcome these challenges, there is a need for increased investment in agroecological research and development, as well as policy and market interventions that support small-scale agroecological production. This includes investments in soil health, agrobiodiversity, and the development of appropriate technologies and extension services. There is also a need for increased awareness and education on the benefits of agroecology among farmers, policymakers, and the general public.
In conclusion, agroecology offers a promising alternative to the dominant model of industrial agriculture. By prioritizing the interdependence of natural resources and ecosystem services, it can lead to more sustainable and resilient agroecosystems, as well as more inclusive and equitable food systems. However, there are also challenges to its implementation, and there is a need for increased investment in research, policy, and education to promote agroecological practices.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Agroecology: An Alternative Model for Sustainable Agriculture
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!