Agroecology: An Alternative Model for Sustainable Agriculture
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Agroecology: An Alternative Model for Sustainable Agriculture
Agroecology is an alternative model for sustainable agriculture that emphasizes ecological principles and traditional knowledge to improve agricultural productivity, promote sustainability, and enhance the well-being of farmers and communities. It is based on the understanding that the agricultural ecosystem is a complex system, and that interactions between crops, animals, humans, and the environment are critical to the success of agricultural systems. In this article, we will explore the principles of agroecology and its potential benefits for sustainable agriculture.
Principles of Agroecology:
- Diversity
Agroecology emphasizes the importance of diversity in agricultural systems. By promoting the use of diverse crops, livestock, and agroforestry systems, agroecology can increase productivity, reduce pest and disease pressure, and improve soil fertility.
- Co-creation of knowledge
Agroecology recognizes the importance of traditional and local knowledge in developing sustainable agricultural systems. By combining this knowledge with modern scientific research, agroecology can create innovative solutions for sustainable agriculture.
- Agroecosystem health
Agroecology recognizes the importance of maintaining the health of the entire agroecosystem, including soil, water, air, and biodiversity. By promoting the use of organic and natural farming practices, agroecology can reduce the negative impact of agricultural practices on the environment and increase the resilience of agroecosystems.
- Resilience
Agroecology emphasizes the importance of building resilient agricultural systems that can withstand environmental shocks and stresses. By promoting the use of diverse crops and livestock, as well as innovative agricultural practices, agroecology can increase the resilience of agricultural systems.
Benefits of Agroecology:
- Increased productivity
Agroecology has been shown to increase agricultural productivity, particularly in smallholder farming systems. By promoting the use of diverse crops and livestock, agroecology can reduce the risk of crop failure, increase soil fertility, and improve pest and disease control.
- Reduced environmental impact
Agroecology promotes the use of organic and natural farming practices, which can reduce the negative impact of agriculture on the environment. By reducing the use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, agroecology can reduce soil and water pollution, as well as greenhouse gas emissions.
- Improved livelihoods
Agroecology can improve the livelihoods of farmers and communities by increasing productivity and reducing the cost of inputs. By promoting the use of locally available resources and traditional knowledge, agroecology can increase the resilience of agricultural systems and enhance the well-being of farmers and communities.
- Food sovereignty
Agroecology promotes food sovereignty, which is the right of people to determine their own food and agriculture policies. By promoting the use of diverse and locally adapted crops, agroecology can increase food security and reduce dependence on imported food and agricultural inputs.
Conclusion:
Agroecology is an alternative model for sustainable agriculture that emphasizes ecological principles and traditional knowledge to improve agricultural productivity, promote sustainability, and enhance the well-being of farmers and communities. By promoting diversity, co-creation of knowledge, agroecosystem health, and resilience, agroecology can increase productivity, reduce environmental impact, improve livelihoods, and promote food sovereignty. The implementation of agroecology requires a shift in agricultural policies and practices, as well as the adoption of innovative solutions that combine traditional and modern knowledge. By investing in agroecology, we can develop sustainable agricultural systems that enhance the well-being of farmers and communities while also promoting environmental sustainability and social justice.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Agroecology: An Alternative Model for Sustainable Agriculture
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!