After school Tutoring Program Discussion Essay Paper
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
After school Tutoring Program Discussion Essay Paper
You will complete the Microsoft Word template using 1,500 to 3,000 words to explain specifics
of your project implementation. For full credit, you must address each point in each section
listed. The objective is to demonstrate that you have thought through in detail what it would
mean to provide a certain type of assistance.
Although you may cross-reference points between sections, the questions from each section must
be answered in that section to get credit for your response. The amount of credit you receive will
depend on how thoroughly you have considered your implementation: you should attempt to
write so that a reasonable reader would need to ask few or no follow-up questions to clarify your
overall objective, people you will help, assistance provided, project management, timeline,
assessment procedures, ethics and CWV analysis, and reflections.
Write-ups that leave many
questions unanswered or with significant gaps will earn less credit. Be sure to support your
claims with evidence.
Here are the sections that you will be completing in the Microsoft Word template:
I)
Titles for both the Project and Each Section
1)
A title for your write-up, including your name, the date, the course, and your
instructor’s name. Your title should capture the essence of your project (e.g., “Tiny
Homes for the Homeless in Mendenhall, MS”)
2)
Titles for Each sections – generic ones are provided in the template but most should
be adapted to your specific project.
II)
Whom will you help? Instead of this question the actual Write-Up
should have a statement of the group you intend to aid.In this section, you must address the following questions:In this section, you must address the following questions:
1.
What are the starting and ending dates of your project? (These should be 5 years in
the future and run for the 12 weeks of your project.)
2.
Out of your 12-week timeframe, how many weeks will you need to start up your
project before beginning to provide assistance to people in need? What will you need
to accomplish during these weeks?
3.
Where will central operations for your project be? Will you rent a location, look for a
donated location, or work in a distributed way (say from people’s houses)?
4.
How would you prove to an outside authority (e.g., an auditor) that everything is in
place to proceed with your operation? If permits and/or licenses are required, this
should be included. If not, you should provide evidence that none are required (e.g., a
government website).
5.
Will you need volunteers, paid workers, or both? How will you screen personnel?
What kinds of skills, special training, licenses, or certification do your personnel need
to assist with your project and why?
6.
How will you coordinate volunteer efforts, and what will they do? How many
volunteers and/or workers do you expect to have?
V)
What will you accomplish in the main part of your project?
In this section, you must address the following questions:
1.
How many weeks will you spend providing assistance to people in need?
2.
How many people in need do you expect to be able to assist, and in what ways?
Provide evidence that the personnel and time available are sufficient to achieve this
goal.
© 2021. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Version – Fa21
3.
Where is your local community (city, state/province, and country) in which you will
be providing assistance?
2.
Describe the specific group of people in your local community that you will be
helping. Why do they need assistance? What is their economic status? What mix of
ages and genders are they? Etc.
3.
How will you get the word out to the people you want to help? Why did you choose
this approach?
© 2021. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Version – Fa21
III)
What assistance will you provide? Instead of this question the actual
Write-Up should have a statement of the type of aid you are offering.
In this section, you must address the following questions:
1.
What specific assistance will you bring to the people who need it (goods, services,
training, cash assistance, etc.)? (Here, a response like “cash payments of $50 per
person per week” is better than “cash payments.”) Does the assistance provided
change based on age, gender, family grouping, etc.?
2.
How and where will you provide the assistance to people in need? Will you maintain
a location for people to come to? Will you visit people where they are? Will you
provide transportation if needed (or if that’s part of your service)? Etc.
3.
How will this assistance help people in the short run? That is, how might people be
better off immediately because of the assistance you provide?
4.
How will this assistance help people in the long run? That is, how might the
assistance you provide have lasting effects, even if it is time-limited?
IV)
How will you start up and manage your project?
How will you track and document whom you are helping and the process by which
you are providing assistance?
VI)
How will you wrap up and evaluate your project?
In this section, you must address the following questions:
1.
Out of the 12-week time frame, how many weeks will you need to wrap up your
project?
2.
In those weeks, what steps will you take to wrap up your project? What records will
you retain, and how will you archive those? What steps are required to finalize any
location-related expenses?
3.
How will you conclude relationships with people you are assisting? When your
assistance is no longer available to the people in need, what additional sources of
support can you direct them to? How likely is it that these additional sources will be
available to the people you helped?
4.
If you had to determine immediately after the end of your project whether your
assistance had helped, how would you do that? What kind of metric or metrics could
you use to determine whether a particular individual had been helped? What
questions would you need to ask to determine this?
5.
Similarly, how could you determine, 3 months after the end of your project, whether
your project assistance was still having an effect? How would you get back in touch
with people you had helped? What characteristics of their condition could you
measure to determine whether any positive impact from your assistance still
remained?
VII)
Ethics and Christian Worldview Analysis
In this section, you must address the following questions:
1.
How does your project demonstrate the Judeo-Islamic-Christian ideal of loving your neighbor as yourself? What other religious and/or ethical principles does your project
strive to exemplify or realize?
2.
How are the people you propose to help different from you, and how might you
structure your project to help bridge differences and lead to increased mutual
understanding and respect?
3.
How does your project further the goal of affording human value and dignity to all
people?
VIII)
Summary and Reflections
In this section, you must address the following questions:
1.
Whom did you contact to learn about local needs and/or additional information to run
a project in your community? What input did they provide to direct your
investigation?
© 2021. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Version – Fa21
2.
What other local needs did you consider? What was compelling to you about the one
you chose?
3.
For the assistance you plan to provide, what other avenues are there for people to
receive that assistance? How likely is it that it will be available to them?
4.
What other factors (legal, political, social, etc.) that were not considered as a part of
this presentation might you need to investigate if you were actually to implement a
project such as this one?
IX)
References
1.
You must support your claims and data with at least three scholarly sources. These
can be journal articles or official government websites with data or other relevant
information about your local community
THE START OF THE PAPER
After school tutoring programs promote a learning environment that will bring benefits to help the youth,families and communities.In my area there have been programs cut from the schooling system and a lot of students are struggling because they are in need of that extra help.
First I would get in touch with the community leaders John Sharpe James @8622354041 in my community aiming to engage more residents and local officials in discussing matters currently impacting city schools.The second would be the NPS/Afterschool Alliance Diane Genco 908-789-0259 dianegenco@njsacc.org the leading after school experts and contacts in New jersey. The third would be the principal at North Star Academy Mr Michael Mann @9732766390 schools work together to develop after school programs, students are exposed to new and creative learning styles
Partnership with the youth, families, and communities working together to provide a total educational experience for youth. Unfortunately In many neighborhoods it’s a disconnect within schools and s
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!