Affordable Healthcare Plan Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Affordable Healthcare Plan Assignment
Running head: AFFORDABLE CARE PLAN 1
AFFORDABLE CARE PLAN 2
Affordable Care Plan
Research Paper Assignment Instructions
Content
- Topic: Affordable Healthcare Plan
Finding Ways that everyone can have health care rights regardless of their health status / as limits on pre-existing conditions and the ways to treat them affordable.
- The research paper should include an introduction of the topic, a body in which the topic is developed, and references cited, and a well-defined conclusion.
- Your paper must have a strong thesis statement. Your thesis is a statement (not a question or a topic) that describes what your paper will be about and provides a unique perspective.
- You are required to have an abstract for your paper.
Administrative Requirements
- The paper must be a minimum of ten (10) pages in length, not including the cover page, abstract, table of contents (optional) and reference pages. Charts, graphs, photos, drawings, lists and extended quotes* will not count against the pages of written text required. *Note: It is a rare instance that an extended quote is appropriate and most of the time they are considered non-academic.
- References must follow the American Psychological Association (APA) guidelines for reference and bibliographic citation. If necessary, refer to Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ED). 2009 Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
- You must use at least five (5) academic bibliographic sources (in addition to any of the required course readings you may use). The University does not support the use of Wikipedia.com as a source for academic research papers.
- Use Times New Roman Font in a 12-point font.
- Use 1 inch for the top, bottom left and right margins.
- Use proper APA format as given to you in the attached example.
Affordable Care Plan
Following the implementation of the Affordable Care plan, the stakeholders in the care sector in the United States have had to change their approach to ensure consumers attain the right to care. Due to pre-existing conditions, high cost of medication and demand for consumer-based care, some of the stakeholders have confronted challenges addressing patient rights. However, the constraints ought not apply to trouble stakeholders capable of collaborating with the patient and other stakeholder in planning for care. As discussed, the formulation of proper guidelines on the approach to collaboration with other stakeholders in promoting consumer-based care is necessary to alleviate challenges of the goal of affordable care of protecting rights of consumers.
The first premise for supporting collaboration in duties is that the approach ensures that stakeholders adhere to the ethical standards of care in service delivery. As a result, the process of ensuring consumers regardless of the health status or preexisting conditions becomes tenable (Protection, & Act, 2010). The recognition of the right of the patient to influence care is equally possible if the service providers coordinate in formulating patient-centered program. Huntington, Covington, Center, Covington, & Manchikanti (2011) notes that the decision helps in preventing overlap of roles that complicate the duties of insurers.
The subsequent premise for supporting collaboration is that coordination facilitates exchange of information that leads to seamless operations when addressing the needs of specific patients. The practice is in line with the stipulation of affordable care act (Obama, 2008). The approach also empowers the consumers to guide professionals on suitable strategies for care and such fulfills the right to quality care.
Additionally, the decision to involve stakeholder alleviate costs incurred in planning on undertakings that can proceed in unison. The care institution sources date from other organizations when dealing with a person of a preexisting conditions. According to Huntington, et al. (2011), the modality minimizes cost since collaboration ensures that each party is cognizant of their roles in care administration.
In conclusion, the formulation of proper guidelines on the approach to collaboration with other stakeholders in promoting consumer-based care is necessary to alleviate challenges of the goal of affordable care of protecting rights of consumers. As discussed, collaboration ensures the progression of duties in accordance with the legislative terms while recognizing patient autonomy. Coordination also facilitates exchange of information leading to awareness in preexisting condition and reduction of costs, thus fulfilling the objective of providing quality care.
References
Huntington, W. V., Covington, L. A., Center, P. P., Covington, L. A., & Manchikanti, L. (2011). Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010: reforming the health care reform for the new decade. Pain Physician, 14(1), E35-E67.
Obama, B. (2008). Affordable health care for all Americans: the Obama-Biden plan. Jama, 300(16), 1927-1928.
Protection, P., & Act, A. C. (2010). Patient protection and affordable care act. Public law, 111(48), 759-762.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!