Advocating for new Practice Approaches through Policy
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Advocating for new Practice Approaches through Policy
Running head: ADVOCACY 1
ADVOCACY 2
Advocating for new Practice Approaches through Policy
Student’s Name
Institution
Date
Advocating for new Practice Approaches through Policy
My proposed practice approach to improve the experiences and outcomes of intensive care patients was early mobilization of the patients. This research was developed on observation and research showing that longer stays in the intensive care units (ICUs) cause higher chances of bad patient experiences and outcomes. However, for this practice approach to be beneficial for patients, it has to be incorporated into policy. No matter how good evidence is, it cannot have a major impact on healthcare unless it is incorporated into health policy and used in decision-making throughout the system (Catallo & Sidani, 2014). However, there are some barriers that may limit the ability to successfully advocate for policy development based on new evidence to implement new practice approaches.
How I would Lead Policy Development for my Selected Issue
To advocate for the policy development relating to the selected issue, I would use Kingdon’s multiple streams approach. This approach explains three streams that can be used to communicate, package, and implement an evidence-based policy. The three streams include problem, policy, and politics (White, Dudley-Brown, & Terharr, 2016). The first stream is the problem, which is used to bring the practice issue to the attention of the policy makers (White et al., 2016). In this phase, I would explain the problem of extended stays in intensive care units and present evidence that they have a negative impact on patient outcomes. Once the policy makers see the problem, they can come to the agreement that something needs to be done to improve the quality of care in ICUs. The next stage is policy where one presents the new knowledge that can be used to solve the problem (White et al., 2016). In my case, I would suggest that they incorporate a system of early patient mobilization. I would present the evidence from research that mobilization speeds up patients’ recovery and enhances their safety and outcomes. Lastly, the politics stream explains the current contexts within which the issue is running (White et al., 2016). In this stream, I would explain the current need for the government to reduce healthcare costs, some of which are caused by extended hospital stays. This policy change would help the government to get closer to reducing healthcare costs.
Strategies to Overcome Barriers while Engaging Stakeholders
One of the strategies I would use to overcome barriers when engaging stakeholders is careful research and presentation of data supporting my proposed change. One of the ways to convince stakeholders to support a given policy development is to ensure that they can trust the effectiveness of the data presented (Andermann, Pang, Newton, Davis & Panisset, 2016). Once they believe that the evidence presented is effective, then it becomes easier to convince them to support the change.
Secondly, I would be careful in the way I present my research to the stakeholders. Many policy stakeholders do not have the time to read through complex and large research papers to understand the evidence presented. They tend to skim through the information that is presented to them while looking for the important factors (White et al., 2016). Therefore, I would focus my policy proposal on the most important information such as findings of the research and their impacts on healthcare practice. I would also use data charts and diagrams to emphasize my points.
Lastly, I would enhance my engagement with the stakeholders by synthesizing data by past studies on similar issues to strengthen my arguments for policy development. Policy stakeholders have no time to research and check through multiple studies to validate the claims made in a proposal (White et al., 2016). Therefore, through strategies such as meta-analyses and systematic reviews, I can be able to summarize the findings of past researchers to show that the policy change is important.
References
White, K. M., Dudley-Brown, S., & Terharr, M. F. (2016). Translation of evidence into nursing and health care practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
Andermann, A., Pang, T., Newton, J.T., Davis, A., & Panisset, U. (2016). Evidence for health II: Overcoming barriers to using evidence in policy and practice. Health Research Policy and Systems, 14 (17) doi 10.1186/s12961-016-0086-3.
Catallo, C. & Sidani, S. (2014). The self-assessment for organizational capacity instrument for evidence-informed health policy: Preliminary reliability and validity of an instrument Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 11(1), 35–45.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!