Advantages Of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking, Psychological Science
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Advantages Of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking, Psychological Science
Running Head: Critical Evaluation on Note Taking 1
Critical Evaluation of Four Articles On Note Taking
Critical Evaluation of Four Articles On Note Taking
Note taking is the process of recording information from another source and is an integral part of university studies. Comprehensive studies have been conducted to underline the cognitive process of note taking. This essay aims to critique four research articles pertaining to the study of note taking namely by highlighting several pros and cons of certain methodologies used, to improve future researches done on the topic of note taking.
The first article aims to examine whether the use of laptops in note taking impairs learning compared to people who were using the longhand method (Mueller & Oppenheimer, 2014). They conducted three experiments to investigate whether taking notes on a laptop versus writing longhand would affect academic
performance, and to explore the potential mechanism of verbatim overlap as a proxy for the depth of processing. They used an experimental design in order to achieve a quantitative result. Using five 15 minutes TED talks lectures, the use of either laptop or longhand method for note taking as a categorical
variable, and 67 participant samples from different university research subject pools, they concluded that participants using laptops were more inclined to take verbatim notes than participants using the longhand method. An overlooked procedure of this methodology is that in their first study, either one or two
students were placed in an enclosed room. Mueller & Oppenheimer (2014) unknowingly made this a variable in their experiment. Additionally, typical university lectures are done in an occupied lecture hall. Mueller and Oppenheimer (2014) should have had his experiments in a lecture hall with students while
testing his participants, emulating an environment similar to the real world. Doing so would increase external validity without sacrificing internal validity. Participants were taken randomly from a pool of voluntary university students, which is a good representation of the larger population for their hypothesis of the
experiment. Mueller and Oppenheimer (2014) did not account for how the participants usually took notes in their classes. Instructing the participants to take down notes in a medium they are not used to could have affected their implicit processing of information, affecting results. The experimenters should have
divided the participants into two separate groups based on which medium they were more comfortable in using. A third control group whereby participants did not take notes would have been beneficial to this experiment, eliminating compromising factors such as selection threats (Trochim, 2006).
Advantages Of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking, Psychological Science
The next article alleviates most of the previously stated concerns. This experiment was conducted to determine whether students’ note-taking and online chatting can influence their recalls of lecture content and note quality (Wei , Wang & Fass, 2014). Wei et al. (2014) prepared the experimental study by having
two undergraduates individually rate the video lecture and chatroom application. The two undergraduates rated the experiment materials to be as close as 90% similar to real world situations. This eliminates any researcher biases that may affect the overall results and ensures high levels of external validity. The
experiment quantitatively concluded that students who participated in online chatting while learning performed worse in immediate recall test. Cognitive learning was measured by a 10 multiple-choice questionnaire based on the lecture. This method of measurement does not go fully with the hypothesis of the experiment. Recognition refers to our ability to correctly identify a piece of presented information, while recall designates the retrieval of related details from memory. The multiple-choice questionnaire tests the participant’s cognitive recognition instead of their recall. To alleviate this, the experimenters could
simply replace the multiple-choice questions with a ‘fill-in-blank’ questions. Cognitive learning based on recall then could be measured by the amount of correct keywords used by the participants. The experiment also only takes into account of short-term memory learning. Wei et al. (2014) had completely
disregarded long-term memory learning. Certain university students are adept to cram lots of information into their short-term memory, disregarding the actual process of learning and instead ‘vomits’ the information back out during examinations. Wei et al. could have had another questionnaire after some time
had passed, to confirm that actual cognitive learning has occurred within the participants.
Advantages Of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking, Psychological Science
The purpose of the studies reported in this article is to evaluate the hypothesis that transcription fluency, verbal working memory capacity, and the ability to identify main ideas would be related to the quality of notes (Peverly, Ramaswamy, Brown, Sumowski & Alidoost, 2007). Peverly et al. (2007) quantitatively
concluded that transcription fluency is important not only to writing essays but to record the ideas presented in the lecture as well. The experiment was conducted by having 85 undergraduate participants watch a 20 minute videotape on the psychology of problem solving. The participants were then told to take
notes as detailed as possible as they only had 10 minutes to study their notes and were tasked to complete tests, such as letter fluency. Participants were then tasked to write summary of the videotape. A limitation of this correlational design study is that while it proves that there is a relationship between
transcription fluency and note quality, it cannot determine if it is a sole causation factor. A correlation coefficient is able to numerically link the strength between the dependent variables and independent variables, but does not factor in other variables such as cognitive abilities (McLeod, 2008), or for example in this case, interest in the videotape content. This makes the experiment somewhat lack internal validity. On the other hand when investigating relationships for the first time, correlational studies provides a good starting position. It allows researchers to determine the strength and direction of a relationship so that
later studies can narrow the findings down and, if possible, determine causation experimentally. The experimenters also intentionally introduced a positive bias onto the participants as they were told that they had to write a summary of the videotape. This would implicitly induce a mindset whereby the
participants would work harder to study the notes, though it would be tedious to take into account each participants cognitive ability to do so.
The final article examines whether research into student’s conceptualisations can contribute to the understanding of taking notes in lectures (Badger, White, Sutherland & Haggis, 2001). A descriptive study based on survey research, Badger et al. (2001) proceeded the experiment by administering a semi-
structured interview. 18 self-selected student participants were interviewed by the members of the research team who were not teaching them. Badger et al. (2001) qualitatively reached four conclusions, most notably that understanding students’ views on note taking and how the lectures were conceptualised by
the students, were necessary to complement future research in this area. An advantage of a survey research is that it offers a unique means of data collection. Badger et al. (2001) had access to what the three other studies lacked, which was the personal experience of their participants, in addition to statistical
data. Interviewers in semi-structured interviews also have the flexibility to follow topical trajectories in the conversation, and may stray from the guide whenever appropriate. This allows a more natural flow of conversation between the interviewer and interviewee. A limitation that this experiment has is that the
participants were self volunteers. The experiment would have yielded a more representative result if the participants were chosen at random. Social desirability bias is also a huge factor of a survey research design. Social desirability bias refers to the fact that in self-reports, people will often report inaccurately on
sensitive topics in order to present themselves in the best possible light (Fisher, 1993). In this experiment, Badger et al. (2001) had no way to deduce that what answers that were put forward by the participants were actually true. The participants could have either implicitly or explicitly produced answers that
projected themselves in a good manner. This may even be reinforced by the fact that most of the participants have never been taught by the researchers.
To summarise, the four articles have provided insight on how research on note taking has been done. Generalisability, or ecological validity, is one of the key factors of any study. It refers to the more control psychologists exert in a study, the less they may be able to generalise. Balance between internal and
external validity is therefore crucial, such as the sample used. A quantitative conclusion should be strived as much as possible, though conducting a qualitative pilot study would be complementary. Quantitative methods ensure high amounts of data while qualitative methods would result in a more in-depth
insight and information on how a certain phenomenon affects the real world. If time and cost is adequate, conducting the two methods would provide a comprehensive conclusion to any hypothesis, which would be beneficial for avoiding pre-judgements. That being said, study mediums are ever changing, from
the more traditional longhand method in the previous century, to the more current culture of using the laptop. Future researchers should take into consideration all the points that were raised in this analysis for their studies, and in time, reach our unified goal of understanding the human brain.
Advantages Of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking, Psychological Science
References
Badger, R., White, G., Sutherland, P., & Haggis, T., (2001) Note perfect: an investigation of how students view taking notes in lectures, System 29, 405-417
Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning, Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 303-315.
Flora, F.W., Wang, Y.K., & Fass, W. (2014). An experimental study of online chatting and note taking techniques on college students’ cognitive learning from a lecture, Computers in Human Behaviour, 34, 148-156.
McLeod, S. A. (2008). Correlation. Retrieved from www.simplypsychology.org/correlation.html
Mueller, P.A., & Oppenheimer, D.A. (2014).The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking, Psychological Science.
Peverly, S.T., Ramaswamy, V., Brown, C., Sumowski, J., & Alidoost, M., (2007) What Predicts Skill in Lecture Note Taking?, Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 167-180
Trochim, W., (2006) Multiple group threats. Retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/intmult.php
Advantages Of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking, Psychological Science
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Advantages Of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking, Psychological Science
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! Advantages Of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking, Psychological Science