Access Control Systems and Identification Badges
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Access control systems (ACS) is a security system designed to regulates user and group of authorized users name and password to organization secured data center, specific buildings, specific workstation, keys and badges to enter only assigned rooms and buildings relative to allotted duties. Access control systems tend to allow keyless entry to organization high-sensitivity areas, indicating that a special identification (ID) card is required to gain entry. Access control cards operates in conjunction with card readers situated by entrances to facility and high-security data center units within organization facility. Every now and then, the card is swiped or waved in front of the reader, which processes and verify the information on the card prior to allowing authorized user’s access. It must be underscored that ACS is more secure than traditional keyed entry; recognizing the fact that if access control card is misplaced, lost, and makes its way into the wrong hands, it can easily be deactivated for the same personnel.
Access control systems is categorized into three variations: discretionary access control (DAC), mandatory access control (MAC), and role-based access control (RBAC). discretionary
35
access control (DAC) is designated to hold leaders of organization accountable of why individual should be allowed access to secured control locations. DAC is the least restrictive unit compared to the other systems that often allow individual or group of individuals complete access to organization network data center. The downside of discretionary access control is allowing authorized users opportunity to upgrade access level, privileges and permissions even to nonmembers of the organization; mandatory access control (MAC) and mandatory access control is utilized in organizations that require an elevated emphasis on the confidentiality, sorting and identification of vital data. Unlike DAC, MAC have an established mechanism to control authorized and unauthorized users’ access to secured data center. Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) appears somewhat challenging and demanding but susceptible in most facet of access control systems.
Per Fennelly, (2017:256), effective access control system is designated to prevent espionage devices, dangerous materials, assets, records, vital data, and intellectual properties out of the organization facility. Furthermore, access control systems and identification badges often reinforce the recognition of employee activities including Identification (ID) cards, badge exchange, escort of temporary consultant and visitors in and out of the facility.
1. You have been retained as a Lead Information Technology (IT) Director in University registrar unit. Student and personnel records are especially important to the institution. Recognizing three essential components of access control systems and identification badges, which of these components; discretionary access control (DAC), mandatory access control (MAC), and role-based access control (RBAC) will you implement to support the institution registrar unit.
2. Professional inquiry: which of these three types of can be used to protect and defend access rights to the records, data information of students and personnel embedded in the university registrar unit?
- Role-based access control
- Discretionary access control
- Mandatory access control
- Relational access control
3. Provide comprehensive narrative on how your plan of action will postulate offensive and defensive measures for the university registrar unit.
400-500 words. APA formatting with at least 4 references(sorted).
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!