Access Control Approaches and Types of Authentication Mechanisms
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Access Control Approaches and Types of Authentication Mechanisms
Discuss the four processes involved in access control approaches and the types of authentication mechanisms (dentification, authentication, authorization, and accountability). Provide at least one example of each type of authentication mechanism that you use on a regular basis to access a network system. What are some of the challenges associated with physical security in these authentication mechanisms? Are there any cryptography or encryption processes involved?
Firewalls
All firewalls have some type of logging feature. This feature documents how the firewall handled various types of network traffic. The logs, if enabled, provide valuable information like source and destination IP addresses, port numbers, and protocols. You can also use the Windows Firewall log file to monitor TCP and UDP connections and packets that are blocked by the firewall.
Using your own computer, explain step-by-step how you would locate and enable the firewall log and monitor your own network traffic. Provide screenshots to document this process. What would you be able to determine from logging the firewall activity?
Philosophical Understanding Of Change.
Write a script as if you were a local business leader is looking for ways to promote change around personal and professional growth and learning for all members of the community. They have asked you to present your philosophy of change to the community.
Provide a clear, concise overview of the 10 Skills and their importance for personal and professional life.
Provide an overview of your philosophy of change that includes a summary of your approaches to reacting, framing, and managing change and use specific examples to connect them to approaches to solving problems.
Explain the relationship between the 10 Skills and your personal philosophy of change using concrete examples to support ideas.
3-6 paragraphs
THe 10 skills are n
HOW THE 10 SKILLS SUPPORT CRITICAL THINKING
Remember that critical thinking refers to habits of mind that expand your ability to understand and come to your own conclusions about a topic, and that habits are shortcuts to decision making. You can build strong habits by applying all 10 Skills to the task:
Agility enables you to respond to a changing world. You can look ahead and anticipate changing situations with an open mind.
Communication encourages you to think about the best way to connect with your audience and convey information clearly and effectively.
Initiative helps you take proactive action to improve your circumstances or create new ones.
Innovation gives you the tools to think creatively to generate original ideas and strategies.
Problem solving helps you generate solutions to meet challenges and accomplish goals.
Productivity enables you to organize and plan so that you use your time efficiently.
Relationship building means developing a trusted network to support you.
A results driven approach keeps your focus on the end result, so you can face challenges with resilience and achieve your goals.
Self and social awareness help you make decisions based on personal and social values.
Technology lets you gather information and
Describe the three methods used to represent a set. Give an example of a set represented by each method. Respond to at least 2 of your classmates.
Submission Instructions:
Your initial post should be at least 200 words/numbers or a combination of both. Your initial post is worth 60 points.
Additional readings must be cited, and formatted in the current APA style.
You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending or adding supplementary distinction to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 40 points (20 points per response).
All replies should contain a minimum of 100 words/numbers or a combination of both.
All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.
You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the due date.
find and watch a recorded speech via YouTube or other online video repositories. In your post, analyze the speech for effectiveness. For example, what communication styles or traits did the speaker use? Was the main message effectively communicated?
Please be sure to include the link to the speech as well.
Initial Posting:
In 2-3 paragraphs, respond to the topics detailed below.
What speech did you choose and why?
What did you like about it?
Was the speaker a natural speaker or was it forced? Describe.
What did you learn from it and how can you apply it to your life?
Would you seek out other speeches by this person or on this topic? Why or why not?
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!