A Survey of the Humanities
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
A Survey of the Humanities
HUMN 1201
Dr. Cecile de Rocher
Critical Essay: Image Analysis
Due by 11:59pm on 11/8 in GeorgiaVIEW
Principle
For this assignment, you will write an essay explaining why you like two images. Choose two pieces of art from the list on this sheet. Examine them carefully, and write an essay. Why do you like them? Please focus your comments on the art itself, not on your own self. Use only the lecture materials (PowerPoints, handouts, scripts, films, classroom notes) and the textbook as your sources.
Technique
For the introductory paragraph, explain which images you will discuss, who made them, from what period they come, and what figure numbers they have. Sum up in a sentence what makes you like this artwork. You may use the pronouns “I” and “me,” but not “you.”
Refer to the artist initially by full name, then only by last name (except Italian masters, such as Leonardo). Use italics and capitalization for titles, which you may abbreviate afterwards. (Most ancient and medieval pieces are untitled.)
For the body, discuss 2-3 aspects of the pieces that prompt a positive response. Do not simply explain what the piece depicts. Instead, analyze elements of the art that make it appealing to you. If you have trouble thinking of anything to say, ask me for help. Hint: Talk about the art. Don’t discuss yourself too much or overuse the first person (“I” and “me”).
Discuss art in present tense: “Mary holds the infant Jesus on her lap.” If you refer to the Judeo-Christian-Islamic deity, capitalize the “G” in “God.” Use at least four (4) vocabulary terms in the essay, and use boldface for these words to help me spot them.
Do use the textbook and make an MLA-style bibliography (Works Cited). You may quote, paraphrase, or summarize, but furnish the page number. In an essay this short, please do not use block quotes. For the conclusion, make some observations about the art or about your reaction to it.
Do not use other sources (including Internet). I will deduct points for any material that comes from a non-class source, and I will report plagiarism to the director of Student Conduct.
Format
Write 500-750 words, double spaced, in twelve-point Times New Roman font. Use the same format (MLA) as usual. Give the essay a good title, but don’t underline it, and don’t put it in quotes.
Evaluation
Have aesthetics in mind and analyze the art, but do not express at length your personal opinions or feelings. Your reaction to the art must come from the piece itself, and I will evaluate your essay on how well you explain. Use the vocabulary learned in class. Observe the conventions of essay composition: organization, development, sentence structure, spelling, punctuation. Proofread carefully for errors. You may ask me or the Writing Lab faculty any questions about what you’ve written, but do so before the due date.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!