A Home Health Visit Scenario Case Study
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
A Home Health Visit Scenario Case Study
Question:
Diagnose and define important problems/issues in a situation; and then, select useful alternatives to respond to such problems?
BACKGROUND
John Maxwell, CEO of Seabury Nursing Center, a not-for-profit long-term care organization located in suburban
Connecticut, had just emerged from a board of directors meeting. He was contemplating the instructions he had received
from the board’s executive committee to assess the financial feasibility of adding a home care program to the Center’s
array of services.
Seabury’s current services consist of two levels of inpatient care, chronic care, and subacute units, and a senior citizens’
apartment complex financed in part by the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development. In keeping with its
mission, Seabury has a reputation of providing personalized, high-quality, and compassionate care across all levels of its
continuum.
The CEO and his executive team agreed to meet the following week to plan the next steps.
FRAMEWORK OF THE BOARD’S MANDATE
At its last retreat, the board made clear that, reimbursement and payment systems notwithstanding, Seabury must
establish realistic and achievable financial plans that are consistent with their strategic plans. Accordingly, three points
relative to integrating strategic planning and financial planning should hold sway:
Both are the primary responsibility of the board
Strategic planning should precede financial planning
The board should play an active role in the financial planning process
Ultimately, every important investment decision involves three general principles:
Does it make sense financially?
Does it make sense operationally?
Does it make sense politically?
The board’s interest in a possible home initiative was guided by these stipulations, particularly as they relate to Seabury’s
growth rate in assets and profitability objectives. As a result of the financial downturn, the organization is experiencing
declining inpatient volumes, a deteriorating payer mix, and a higher cost of capital, all of which have the potential to
weaken its liquidity position.
Taking the strategic service line path to a home care program would be less capital intensive and should appeal broadly to
the significant baby boomer population residing in its service area, whose preference would undoubtedly be to be treated
in their homes.
A Home Health Visit Scenario Case Study
INDUSTRY PROFILE
When John Maxwell convened his executive team the following week, he had already decided to present an overview of the
home health industry as gleaned by Seabury’s Planning Department. He prefaced his comments by drawing on recent
research by the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality that detailed why home health care in the 21st century
is different from that which has existed in the past. He cited four reasons:
1.We’re living longer and more of us want to “age in place” with dignity.
2.We have more chronic, complex conditions.
3.We’re leaving the hospital earlier and thus need more intensive care.
4.Sophisticated medical technology has moved into our homes. Devices that were used only in medical offices are now in
our living rooms and bedrooms. For example, home caregivers regularly manage dialysis treatments, infuse strong
medications via central lines, and use computer-based equipment to monitor the health of loved ones.1
The CEO presented a profile of national home care data as compiled by the National Association for Home Care and Hospice as follows:
Approximately 12 million people in the United States require some form of home health care.
More than 33,000 home healthcare providers exist today.
Almost two-thirds (63.8%) of home healthcare recipients are women.
More than two-thirds (69.1%) of home healthcare recipients are over age 65.
Conditions requiring home health care most frequently include diabetes, heart failure, chronic ulcer of the skin,
osteoarthritis, and hypertension.
Medicare is the largest single payer of home care services. In 2009, Medicare spending was approximately 41% of the total
home healthcare and hospice expenditure.2
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, he continued, in 2010 Connecticut’s population was 3,574,097 of which 14.4% were
age 65 or older.3A Visiting Nurse Association (VNA) analysis of revenue by payer source in the state indicated that 60% of
revenue was derived from Medicare.4
FEASIBILITY DETERMINATION
The CEO went on to explain that the feasibility determination would be based on initially setting the home care program’s
capacity at 50 clients because that was the minimum required for Certificate-of-Need (CON) approval in Connecticut. He
distributed a model developed by healthcare finance expert William O. Cleverly (Figure 27–1), which presents the logic
behind the integration of strategic and financial planning.
In essence, he said, financial planning is influenced by the definition of programs and services in consort with the mission
and goals. The next step entails financial feasibility of the proposed homecare program. Among the components that
should be considered in determining financial feasibility are the following:
The configuration and cost of staff
The prevailing Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates
Figure 27–1 Integration of Strategic and Financial Planning.
Reproduced from W.O. Cleverley, Essentials of Health Care Finance, 7th ed. (Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett), 289.
A projection of visit frequency by provider category based on the most prevalent clinical conditions
The physical location of the program and its attendant costs (e.g., rent, new construction)
A projection of cash flows
Direct care staff associated with the home care program includes:
- Medical Social Worker (MSW)
- Physical Therapist (PT)
- Home Health Aide (HHA)
- Registered Nurse (RN)
- Registered Dietitian (RD)
Maxwell indicated that it would be useful to create a scenario depicting a home health visit abstract incorporating
prevailing Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates for a 70-year-old male with heart failure and no comorbidities in
order to gain traction and project potential cash flow. As previously noted, heart failure is a condition frequently requiring
home healthcare services. Productivity in the home is typically based on the average number of visits per day by provider
category. The visit scenario is depicted in Table 27–1.
Table 27–1 A Home Health Visit Scenario
Services Visit Frequency Payer Rate Rate × 4.2* Medicare Cost Medicaid Cost Nursing (RN) 2x/month, every other week Mc $166.83 $700.69 $700.69 Medical Social Worker (MSW) Visits wily for 4 wks. MA $119.51 $501.94 $501.94 Physical Therapist (PT) 3x wily for 2 wks. Mc $103.22 $433.52 $433.52 Home Health Aide (HHA) Visits 4hrs MWF wily for 60 days Mc $25.00 $1,260.00 $1,260.00 Registered Dietitian (RD) 3x wily for 1 wk. MA $103.16 $309.48 Mc = Medicare
MA = Medicaid
*4.2 = The state′s formula for the #wks./per month
Total monthly Medicaid budget = $826.95
Total monthly Medicare budget = $2,394.21
Figure 27–2 Seabury Nursing Center’s Home Healthcare-Related Organization Chart.
Once the board decides to move ahead with the home care program and it is approved by the state, implementation and
ongoing operations becomes a management control issue (see the Cleverly model in Figure 27–1). The CEO refers to a
proposed table of organization as illustrated in Figure 27–2.
Given the paucity of other home care programs in its service area, Maxwell knows that Seabury is likely to be accorded a
green light.
As he and his team reflect on this, the looming question will be where will the clients come from? He knows that likely
referral sources will include Seabury’s subacute inpatient population and residents from its senior citizens’ apartment
complex who are
“aging in place.” Other likely sources will be recently discharged patients from the region’s two community hospitals, both
bereft of home care programs. A premium will be placed on effective case management, and direct marketing to the
community will also be necessary.
NOTES
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Human Factors Challenges in Home Health Care,” Research Activities, no. 376 (December 2011).
National Association for Home Care and Hospice, Basic Statistics about Home Care (Updated 2010).
Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Demographic Profile.
Visiting Nurse Association, VNA Healthcare Annual Report (Hartford, CT: Hartford Healthcare, 2012).
A Home Health Visit Scenario Case Study
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! A Home Health Visit Scenario Case Study