A Defense for Animal Rights Essay Paper
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
A Defense for Animal Rights Essay Paper
craft the best defense of animal rights that properly respects race and identity.
our idea:
Humans are also classified as animals, so that we must give animals their rights under the restriction of jungle law. In the wild worlds, carnivore will prey other species. Humans are also kind of carnivore, so that we can’t limit human beings on eating animals. (Captive breeding will consider as one kind of method of predation)
Slavery is considered cruel now, and also wild animals won’t force others to work for them, even intelligence difference exists among them. So, humans can’t force animals to work, like farm work and animal performance.
SMC Racism and Ethnicity & White Privilege and Dehumanizing Discussion
Two Media Consumption Reflection #6 and #7
For today’s MCR, you must analyze a media example of White Privilege and Dehumanizing which should be three paragraphs.
And Another MCR of analyzing a media example of Racism and Ethnicity,
How To Do Your Media Consumption Reflections (MCRs)You will analyze and write about ten (10) of your media consumption experiences this semester, as follows: Choose a media item you have recently consumed. With the exception of the first two MCRs (when you must choose to analyze advertisements), and the third MCR (when you must choose a news item to analyze), your chosen media could be anything with relevance to this class: a television show, a news broadcast, a song, an article, a book, an advertisement, etc. Over the semester, choose a variety of different types of media to analyze.1st Paragraph: Tell us about the item you’re discussing. Describe it. (i.e.: name, title, what it is, etc.) Embed the item you are discussing within your description.
You can embed the item itself, its website, or an article about it. For example, if your media item is a movie, you could embed the movie website or a trailer for the movie. Describe the circumstances under which you consumed the media artifact. In a movie theater with friends? Alone at home on television? While driving, or reading your class homework? Etc.=2nd and 3rd Paragraphs:
Write at least two paragraphs (beyond the description) discussing your media item. Use two of the vocabulary terms, ideas, and/or concepts we are exploring in class (one term per paragraph) – and underline them when you mention them. If there is an assigned term for that week’s MCR, you must use that term as one of your underlined words. Underline one term per paragraph, one time and discuss it fully. The underlined terms must be within your analysis/reflection paragraphs, not within your description paragraph.
You must discuss each term you underline. So, you may NOT simply say something like: “This is clearly an example of racism and objectification,” and then leave it at that. You have to say why you feel that way. What about that piece of media specifically makes you draw those conclusions? Critically analyze how your term applies, and comment upon what is being communicated about race, gender, sexuality, social class, etc.
Your analysis must relate to the class themes of race, gender, sex, class, etc. If you are unsure about how to do a media analysis, consult the Media Education Foundation’s guides for analyzing ads: Deconstructing a Print Advertisement (Links to an external site.)Deconstructing a Video Advertisement: (Links to an external site.)Let me know why you chose this particular item to write about, how it relates to our class discussion or readings, and what you personally think/feel about it.I will be looking for personal experiences, insights, and critical thinking as you share your experiences.
If you’re analyzing an advertisement (required for your first two reflections – optional after that), be sure to use the 4 step MEF method learned in class (and described below) for analyzing an ad. Comment thoughtfully and substantially on two or more of your classmates’ entries. Write at least 3 sentences, that *add something new* to the discussion. Do ten (10) MCRs during the semester. Turn each one in, within the appropriate place on Canvas. Each MCR must be posted by its due date on the Canvas Calendar. No points for late entries. That’s it!
Have fun with this one. Post things you’re genuinely interested in talking about. Make your reflections personal to you and interesting to us. How to Analyze a Media Artifact: Be sure to include these steps in your three+ paragraphs: DESCRIPTION: Denotatively read (describe, depict) the ad you have consumed. (Your first paragraph.) ANALYSIS: Discover and focus on significant patterns and messages that emerge from your denotative read of the ads.
What messages/meanings do you think are generated from your ad in relationship to race, gender, class, and/or sexuality? INTERPRETATION: Connotatively read your ad by asking and answering the “What does that mean?” and “So what?” questions about your media artifact. EVALUATION: From your description, analysis, and interpretation of the ad thus far, arrive at a judgment, make an assessment of what you read both denotatively and connotatively. (2-4 should appear in your second and third paragraphs. Your evaluation may appear in a fourth paragraph, if you like.)
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!