A Concise History of the American People
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
A Concise History of the American People
Alan Brinkley, Columbia University
Debating the Past
Chapter Sixteen: The Conquest of the Far West
Where Historians Disagree – The “Frontier” and the West
The emergence of the history of the American West as an important
field of scholarship can be traced to the paper Frederick Jackson Turner delivered at a meeting of the American Historical Association in
1893: “The Significance of the Frontier in American History.” Turner
stated his thesis simply. The settlement of the West by white Americans–“the existence of an area of free land, its continuous
recession, and the advance of American settlement westward”–was
the central story of the nation’s history. The process of westward expansion had transformed a desolate and savage land into modern
civilization. It had also continually renewed American ideas of
democracy and individualism.
In the first half of the twentieth century, virtually everyone who wrote
about the West echoed at least part of Turner’s argument. Ray Allen Billington’s Westward Expansion (1949) was almost wholly consistent
with the Turnerian model. In The Great Plains (1931) and The Great
Frontier (1952), Walter Prescott Webb similarly emphasized the bravery and ingenuity of white settlers in the Southwest.
Serious efforts to displace the Turner thesis as the explanation of western American history began after World War II. In Virgin Land
(1950), Henry Nash Smith examined many of the same heroic images
of the West that Turner and his disciples had presented; but he treated those images less as descriptions of reality than as myths. Earl
Pomeroy challenged Turner’s notion of the West as a place of
individualism, innovation, and democratic renewal. “Conservatism, inheritance, and continuity bulked at least as large,” he claimed.
Howard Lamar, in Dakota Territory, 1861-1889 (1956) and The Far
Southwest (1966), emphasized the highly diverse characters of
different areas of the West.
The western historians who began to emerge in the late 1970s
launched an even more emphatic attack on the Turner thesis and the idea of the “frontier.” “New” western historians such as Richard White,
Patricia Nelson Limerick, William Cronon, Donald Worster, Peggy
Pascoe, and many others challenged the Turnerians on a number of points.
Turner saw the nineteenth-century West as “free land” awaiting the expansion of Anglo-American settlement and American democracy.
The “new western historians” have rejected the concept of an empty
“frontier,” emphasizing instead the elaborate and highly developed civilizations that already existed in the region. White, English-speaking
Americans, they have argued, did not so much settle the West as
conquer it. And they continue to share the region not only with the Indians and Hispanics who preceded them there, but also with African
Americans, Asians, Latin Americans, and others who flowed into the
West at the same time they did.
The Turnerian West was a place of heroism, triumph, and above all
progress, dominated by the feats of brave white men. The West the new historians describe is a less triumphant (and less masculine) place
in which bravery and success coexist with oppression, greed, and
failure; in which decaying ghost towns, bleak Indian reservations, impoverished barrios, and ecologically devastated landscapes are as
characteristic of western development as great ranches, rich farms,
and prosperous cities.
To Turner and his disciples, the nineteenth-century West was a place
where rugged individualism flourished and replenished American democracy. The new scholars point out that the region was
inextricably tied to a national and international capitalist economy.
Westerners depended on government-subsidized railroads for access
to markets, federal troops for protection from Indians, and (later)
government-funded dams and canals for irrigating their fields and sustaining their towns.
And while Turner defined the West as a process–a process of settlement that came to an end with the “closing of the frontier” in the
late nineteenth century–the new historians see the West as a region.
Its distinctive history did not end in 1890, but continues into our own time.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!