Evidence-Based Psychotherapeutic Strategies
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
POST # 1 GINA
The purpose of this discussion is to look at the clinical parameters for identifying and assessing trauma, and what psychotherapeutic strategies are useful for people who have experienced trauma. Traumatic events can happen to anyone, at any age during a persons lifetime. While some people think that trauma is only physical violence, it can also be due to emotional or verbal events, severe weather events, and anything that is significant or overwhelming for someone. According to Kleber (2019) the psychiatric classification from the World Health Organization and the DSM-5 defines a traumatic event as the exposure to death, threatened death, actual or threatened serious injury, or actual or threatened sexual violence. The identification of trauma can be done when a person seeks treatment and states they have experienced trauma or a traumatic event. Many people do not know they are victims of trauma, especially children. When patients exhibit the physical or emotional signs or symptoms of trauma is when a practitioner should make an assessment. For children the most common trauma is from violence in or out of their home, this can be from abuse or neglect (Yearwood et al., 2021). Both children and adults can be identified as victims of violent crimes or disaster experiences as well (Sadock et al., 2014). Some many people experience posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or Acute Stress Disorder, or even a personality disorder with dissociation as a result of repeated trauma (Kleber, 2019; Sadock et al., 2014). However, it is important to point out that not every person has lifelong effects from trauma or traumatic experiences. Comorbid mental health issues, supports, and cognitive abilities affect each persons individual responses to trauma.The assessment of trauma can take place in a variety of ways. Through a thorough interview, an APRN can get a sense of trauma in a client through self-reported symptoms. The empathy, knowledge, and communication of the APRN are essential tools during the interview (Wheeler, 2014). Wheeler (2014) discusses the importance of every client being screened for trauma but recognizes for different reasons this doesn’t always happen. There are many scales to help in the assessment of trauma as well such as the Dissociative Experiences Scale and the Adverse Childhood Experience Scale (Wheel, 2014). If trauma is suspected, utilizing scales or additional scales and information are necessary. According to Yearwood et al. (2021) when children are involved gathering information from other sources is helpful in assessing trauma. I believe this is helpful for adults as well. I had a patient recently that we had a family meeting because of her trauma history and treatment-resistant depression.
There are many evidence-based psychotherapeutic strategies that are helpful for individuals that have experienced trauma. For children, psychotherapy is an important treatment modality to assist them with their emotional, behavioral, and social issues that can manifest as a result of trauma (Yearwood et al., 2021). According to Yearwood et al. (2021), both trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy and play therapy are effective for children. For adults, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors such as Zoloft and Paxil have been successful in relieving PTSD symptoms (Sadock et al., 2014). There are other pharmaceutical agents that have known validity to be helpful for PTSD as well. Psychotherapy such as individual and group cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and stress inoculation therapy (SIT) which is a type of CBT that helps patients work and skill-building through education are helpful for trauma (Wheeler, 2014). Mindfulness strategies that teach living in the present moment and staying grounded are wonderful adjunctive skills to add to therapy (Wheeler, 2014). Mindfulness has made an explosion over the past few decades and there are many apps, podcasts, and classes that individuals may find helpful. These modalities both assist individuals in stabilizing and dissociating them from the trauma. Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) is evidence-based for individuals with complex trauma, personality disorders, and chronic suicidality (Wheeler, 2014).
evidence-based psychotherapeutic strategies
ReferencesKleber R. J. (2019). Trauma and Public Mental Health: A Focused Review. Frontiers in psychiatry, 10, 451. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00451
Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2014). Synopsis of Psychiatry (11th ed.). London, England: Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins.
Wheeler, K. (2014). Psychotherapy for the Advanced Practice Nurse Psychiatric Nurse: A How-to Guide for Evidence-Based Practice (2nd ed.). Mosby.
Yearwood, E. L., Pearson, G. S., & Newland, J. A. (2021). Child and adolescent behavioral health: a resource for advanced practice psychiatric and primary care practitioners in nursing. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!