Unintentional Business Torts & Negligence at Glendale Community College HW
Order ID 74573U3JHDJDD Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Description of the question
Thomas Moore was transporting guests for a Christmas party on an E-Z-Go golf cart. Although the golf cart lacked lighting, E-Z-Go did not advise against using it on public roads at night. Moore’s gold cart was struck by a vehicle driven by Joseph Maloney around 8:30 p.m. as he attempted to cross a road from the clubhouse to the parking lot. Maloney claimed he couldn’t see the cart due to the dim lighting. Moore has sued E-Z-Go after being parallelized as a result of the collision. Analyze the Strict Product Liability claim with F-IRAC.
F-IRAC (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5)
5 points for facts
ISSUE: Create an issue statement that defines the legal basis for this claim and links it to a fundamental reality. -20 points
RULE: Create a rule statement based on your issue statement. This statement must include the general rule, elements, and defenses for a total of 50 points.
ANALYSIS: Compose an analysis. Keep in mind that this is a study of both sides of culpability based on social responsibility, norms, elements, and defenses as they apply to facts. Begin your study with Escola and Greenman’s social engineering foundations when you’ve completed your fact summary. Before moving on to elements and defenses, you’ll either include a general rule statement or follow it up with a general rule statement. It’s critical to use case authority to help clarify how the rules, elements, and defenses are applied. /100 pts /100 pts /100 pts
CONCLUSION: Write a conclusion that echoes your issue statement and includes a “why statement” that connects the conclusion to one of the elements, defenses, or facts. -20 points
Additional Instructions
ISSUE:, RULE:, ANALYSIS:, and CONCLUSION: F-IRAC: Proper form of Facts; ISSUE:, RULE:, ANALYSIS:, and CONCLUSION:
Provide adequate fact summaries to allow for detailed examination.
ISSUE: Does it include a legal theory, parties or actors, and a fact that triggered the problem?
RULE: In prose, state the General Rule and explain elements and defenses. Case citations, names, or facts should not be included.
ANALYSIS: Begin by giving a brief overview of the facts and issue. Consider utilizing a separate paragraph to introduce the rule and the items to be addressed if it is a complex set of rules to apply. Compare and contrast the facts of this case with the General Rule, Elements, Defenses, Prior Case Law, and Authority, as well as any policy problems that are relevant to comprehending the legal theory.
CONCLUSION: Use suitable legal conclusion words, such as a because or why statement (often a fact and an element or defense which is determinative of conclusion)
RUBRIC
Quality of Response No Response Poor/Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!