Christian Leader Discussion Essay Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Christian Leader Discussion Essay Assignment
5.2 Discussion-Christian Leader
Getting Started
What is a Christian leader? Does that phrase refer to a leader in a Christian organization? Does it mean any leader who also happens to be a Christian? Does it mean a leader who models specific principles and practices consistent with a Christian worldview? Is it all of the above?
Regardless of how you might define Christian leaders, this discussion will give you the opportunity to consider some of the key principles in a model of Christian leadership and how those principles might contribute to more effective ethical leadership.
Upon successful completion of this discussion, you will be able to:
- Explain key attributes that define a Christian Leader.
Background Information
YOU-TUBE Being Your Best Self, Part 1: Moral Awareness |
Every issue has a moral aspect to it. Thus, ethical decision-making and ethical leadership are not just occasionally relevant but are always relevant. The Ethics Unwrapped material suggests four steps to be our “best self” when it comes to ethical thinking and action. A good first step is Moral Awareness. How does your worldview integrate or value moral awareness?
Moral Awareness (step one).
Anacker and Shoup (2014) noted that a Christian worldview is not “just a set of beliefs; it is the way of life. To be a Christian is to live all of life in a new way, according to new principles—God’s principles” (p. x). Further, the authors stated, “Christian leadership argues for ethics informed by Christian principles” (p. 50).
Anacker and Shoup (2014) offered 11 foundational elements in a model of Christian leadership, including:
- Be a Christ-follower.
- Be filled with the Spirit.
- View your engagement in an organization as a holy calling, a vocation from God.
- Understand that your vocation is carried out as an ambassador of Christ, a citizen of heaven.
- Know that you are a steward, not the owner, of the gifts and talents God has given you, and their purpose is to do kingdom work.
- An experienced Christian fellowship on an ongoing basis.
- Know and apply relevant biblical principles for every word and action.
- Pray without ceasing.
- Actively participate in the body of Christ, His church.
- Align truths from general revelation with special revelation to guide practices.
- Walk by faith and not by sight (i.e., trust in the Lord and do not lean on your own understanding). (pp. 61 – 62)
We might also say that the following list of values articulated by Jesus (and commonly called “The Beatitudes”) suggests some fundamental properties of Christian leadership:
Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted.
Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth.
Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they will be filled.
Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy.
Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God.
Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called sons of God.
Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. (New International Bible, 1973/1984, Matthew 5:3-10).
Instructions
- Review the Background Information.
- Read Faddis (course text).
- Chapter 4; Strategy 9 – pp. 103 – 119.
- Chapter 4; Strategy 10 – pp. 120 – 130.
- Conclusion – p. 131 – 132.
- Read Ludwig and Longnecker’s(new tab) article.
- Write an initial response(300-400 words) to the following prompt(s) or question(s):
- Select one or more of the elements of the Anacker and Shoup (2014) Christian leadership model and/or the Beatitudes and discuss the relationship with ethical leadership and decision-making. What other concepts from the course can you connect? Posts may also explain the possible alignment of ideas with other worldviews.
5.2 Discussion
–
Christian Leader
Getting Started
What is a Christian leader? Does that phrase refer to a leader in a
Christian organization? Does it mean any leader who also happens
to be a Christian? Does it mean a leader who models specific
principles and practices consistent with a Christian worldview? Is it
all of the above?
Regardless of how you might define Christian leaders, this
discussion will give you the opportunity to consider some of the
key principles in a model of Christian leade
rship and how those
principles might contribute to more effective ethical leadership.
Upon successful completion of this discussion, you will be
able to:
Explain key attributes that define a Christian Leader.
Background Information
YOU
–
TUBE
Being Your Best Self, Part 1: Moral Awareness |
Every issue has a moral aspect to it. Thus, ethical decision
–
making
and ethical leadership are not just occasionally relevant but are
always relevant
. The Ethics Unwrapped material suggests four
steps to be our “best self” when it comes to ethical thinking and
action. A good first step is Moral Awareness. How does your
worldview integrate or value moral awareness?
Moral Awareness (step one).
Anacker an
d Shoup (2014) noted that a Christian worldview is not
“just a set of beliefs;
it is the way of life.
To be a Christian is to
live all of life in a new way, according to new principles
—
God’s
principles” (p. x). Further, the authors stated,
“Christian leadership
argues for ethics informed by Christian principles” (p. 50).
Anacker and Shoup (2014) offered 11 foundational elements in a
model of Christian leadership, including:
5.2 Discussion-Christian Leader
Getting Started
What is a Christian leader? Does that phrase refer to a leader in a
Christian organization? Does it mean any leader who also happens
to be a Christian? Does it mean a leader who models specific
principles and practices consistent with a Christian worldview? Is it
all of the above?
Regardless of how you might define Christian leaders, this
discussion will give you the opportunity to consider some of the
key principles in a model of Christian leadership and how those
principles might contribute to more effective ethical leadership.
Upon successful completion of this discussion, you will be
able to:
- Explain key attributes that define a Christian Leader.
Background Information
YOU-TUBE Being Your Best Self, Part 1: Moral Awareness |
Every issue has a moral aspect to it. Thus, ethical decision-making
and ethical leadership are not just occasionally relevant but are
always relevant. The Ethics Unwrapped material suggests four
steps to be our “best self” when it comes to ethical thinking and
action. A good first step is Moral Awareness. How does your
worldview integrate or value moral awareness?
Moral Awareness (step one).
Anacker and Shoup (2014) noted that a Christian worldview is not
“just a set of beliefs; it is the way of life. To be a Christian is to
live all of life in a new way, according to new principles—God’s
principles” (p. x). Further, the authors stated, “Christian leadership
argues for ethics informed by Christian principles” (p. 50).
Anacker and Shoup (2014) offered 11 foundational elements in a
model of Christian leadership, including:
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!