78 Total Points: 25
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
78 Total Points: 25 7
97 Nutrition Feeding and Eating
ATI #3: Skills Module Guidelines: Nutrition Feeding and Eating
PURPOSE:
To encourage critical thinking, problem solving, and collaboration through the use of evidence based practice (EBP) studies.
COURSE OUTCOMES:
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.
1. Examine the sources of knowledge that contribute to professional nursing practice.
2. Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies.
3. Identify ethical issues common to research involving human subjects.
4. Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence-based practice.
5. Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice.
DUE DATE:
· Week #6, Sun. by 11:59pm: Submit in Unit 6, ATI SKILLS MODULE in CANVAS
· Please submit by clicking “Module” for Unit 6 where the “Turnitin” function is implemented (NOT via clicking Grade for Unit 6)
· The College’s Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.
TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS: 150 Points
Preparing the Assignment:
View and read any relevant resource material that could help you better understand the concept or solve the problem(s) given. You can review the module, this is not a priority for this assignment.
· Log into ATI, Select the “Learn” tab.
· Click on Skills Modules and title “Nutrition Feeding and Eating”
· Click on the “Lesson” tab
· Open the “Evidence Based Research” tab at the top of the page.
“Turnitin” Percentage
· Less than 25 percentage: Acceptable percentage.
· Turnitin Draft Submission Box
· Submit your draft of paper into Turnitin Draft Submission Box to check your percentage as many times as needed before you submit your final paper to designated Unit.
· If your Final paper has 25% or higher percentage, you must revise/modify your paper contents BEFORE the paper due date and time.
· If your Final paper has 25% or higher percentage AT/AFTER you submit your final paper due date and time, Academic Integrity Violation Procedures will be initiated:
· Academic Integrity Violation letter will be sent to student
· Assignment Grade will be 0 point
· The violation case will be reviewed and a further sanction will be determined by the Administrators.
Directions and Assignment Criteria
There are five main topics and five associated topics related to each main topic.
· Select ONE main topic.
· Search for ONE Primary Research study for the selected main topic and get approved by Professor. Submit to Canvas shell after approval
· Review article to summarize the required information
TOPIC 1: Evaluating Nutritional Status: What methods can be used to assess nutritional status?
Example Studies:
· Formative evaluation of the feedback components of Children’s and Adolescent’s Nutrition Assessment and Advice on the Web (CANAA-W) among parents of schoolchildren.
· Validation of the Diet Quality Index for adolescents by comparison with biomarkers, nutrient and food intakes: the HELENA study
TOPIC 2: Identifying those at risk for malnutrition: What methods can be used to identify those at risk for malnutrition?
Example Studies:
· Beyond malnutrition screening: Appropriate methods to guide nutrition care for aged care residents
· Population-specific short-form mini nutritional assessment with body mass index or calf circumference can predict risk of malnutrition in community-living or institutionalized elderly people in Taiwan
· Comparison of prevalence of malnutrition diagnosis in head and neck, gastrointestinal and lung cancer patients by three classification methods
TOPIC 3: Malnutrition associated with specific health conditions: What specific health conditions increase the risk of malnutrition?
Example Studies:
· Malnutrition in a sample of community-dwelling people with Parkinson’s disease.
· Nutritional risk index as a predictor of postoperative wound complications after gastrectomy.
· Risk of malnutrition is associated with mental health symptoms in community living elderly men and women: the Tromso Study.
TOPIC 4: Outcomes associated with nutritional status: What associations exist between nutritional status and health outcomes?
Example Studies:
· Role of nutritional status in predicting quality of life outcomes in cancer – a systematic review of the literature
· Nutritional support for liver disease
TOPIC 5: Interventions to improve nutritional status: What type of interventions improve adherence to recommendations on nutritional intake?
Example Study:
· Interventions to enhance adherence to dietary advice for preventing and managing chronic diseases in adults.
WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT:
· Read the study and answer the required questions for each category
· Must write the paper using provided Summary Paper Format on page #3.
· Grading Rubric/Description on page 4-5
ATI #3: Skills Module Contents: Summary Paper Format
· Bold for each Heading and Subheading
· Include in-text citations for all information/contents as needed
· Summary paper MUST be written in this format
Introduction and Key Points
Chosen Topics and Question
· Select one topic and question from five main topic list
Define the Topic and Question
· How do you interpret and/or understand the topic and question you selected?
Overview/Significance of Problem
· Describe Overview and Significance of Problem of the topic and question you selected
· Include in-text citations
Article Search
Current and credible resources: List Chamberlain library Database(s) used
Database search-terms and refinement methods
Number of articles located
List additional sources outside of ATI module: List all sources you used for article search outside of ATI (CDC, American Diabetic Association, etc.)
Article Findings
Why was this article chosen?
How it addresses the topic? State the “Purpose/Aim of Study” as the author stated in article
Type of Research conducted:
· Quantitative, Qualitative, Descriptive, or Mixed-Method study?
· Briefly describe what was done (sample, methods, measurement tools used)
Findings of Research: Comprehensively describe ALL Findings in the article (participant characteristics and Results of Study).
Evidence for Practice
Summary of Evidence
· Briefly summarize the overall purpose and findings of the research.
How will this evidence improve current practice?
· Briefly describe what the current practice is.
· Describe how this evidence improve current practice?
How will this evidence decrease a gap in current practice?
· Briefly describe difference between the current knowledge, skills, competence, practice, performance or patient outcomes and the ideal or desirable state
· Describe how this evidence decrease a gap in the practice?
Any concerns or weaknesses in the evidence/finding? (Found in Discussion)
Sharing of Evidence
Who would you share the information with? (colleagues, other disciplines, patients, families)
How would you share this information? (in-services, online education modules, health fair for patients, educate healthcare professionals)
What resources would you need to accomplish this sharing of evidence?
· List resources you may need for sharing the evidence as you stated in above 2 questions (who and how) (i.e. administrator, manager, support for materials, etc.)
Why would it be important to share this evidence with the nursing profession?
Conclusion
· Summarizes the Theme of Paper, Findings, and Key points.
· Do NOT include Conclusion/Implication on the article
Assignment Criteria Points % Description Pick one of the topics and answer the topic question along with providing a current research article, which supports this question, and 300-word summary. The Summary must include the following headings (See rubric for criteria under each heading): a. Introduction and Key Points (10 points)
b. Article Search (25 points)
c. Article Findings (25 points)
d. Evidence of Practice (25 points)
e. Sharing of Evidence (25 points)
f. Conclusion (20 points)
g. APA style (10 points)
h. Writing mechanics (10 points)
150 100 Student grades will be based on completing ALL criteria listed and according to the rubric. Please see rubric for specific requirement to achieve full points for this assignment Total 150 100 GRADING RUBRIC
Headings Points for Each Heading Heading 1 10 points 7.5 pts 5 pts 2.5 pts 0 pts Introduction and Key points All 4 criteria met: 1) Choose one of assigned Topics and Question
2) Defines the Topic and Question
3) States why it is a problem
4) Information presented in logical sequence
3 of 4 criteria met 2 of 4 criteria met 1 of 4 criteria met Not done Heading 2 25 points 20 pts 15 pts 10 pts 0 pts Article Search All 4 criteria met: 1) Current and credible resource
2) Database search-terms and refinement methods
3) Number of articles located
4) Source outside of ATI module
3 of 4 criteria met 2 of 4 criteria met 1 of 4 criteria met Not done Heading 3 25 points 20 pts 15 pts 10 pts 0 pts Article Finding All 4 criteria met: 1) How it addresses the topic (purpose)
2) Type of research conducted (and include sample, methods)
3) Findings of research
4) Why this article chosen
3 of 4 criteria met 2 of 4 criteria met 1 of 4 criteria met Not done Heading 4 25 points 20 pts 15 pts 10 pts 0 pts Evidence for Practice All 4 criteria met: 1) Summary of evidence
2) How it will improve practice
3) How will this evidence decrease a gap to practice
4) Any concerns or weaknesses located in the evidence
3 of 4 criteria met 2 of 4 criteria met 1 of 4 criteria met Not done Heading 5 25 points 20 pts 15 pts 10 pts 0 pts Sharing of Evidence All 4 criteria met: 1) Who would you share the information with?
2) How would you share this information?
3) What resources would you need to accomplish this sharing of evidence?
4) Why would it be important to share this evidence with the nursing profession
3 of 4 criteria met 2 of 4 criteria met 1 of 4 criteria met Not done Heading 6 20 points 15 pts 10 pts 5 pts 0 pts Conclusion All 4 criteria met: 1) Summarizes the theme of the paper
2) Information presented in logical sequence
3) All key points addressed
4) Conclusion shows depth of understanding
3 of 4 criteria met 2 of 4 criteria met 1 of 4 criteria met Not done Heading 7 10 points 7.5 pts 5 pts 2.5 pts 0 pts APA Style All 4 criteria met: 1) APA style used properly for citations
2) APA style used properly for reference
3) APA style used properly for quotations
4) All references are cited, and all citations have references
3 of 4 criteria met 2 of 4 criteria met 1 of 4 criteria met Not done Heading 8 10 points 7.5 pts 5 pts 2.5 pts 0 pts Writing mechanics All 4 criteria met: 1) No spelling errors
2) No grammatical errors, including verb sentence and word usage
3) No writing errors, including sentence structure, and formatting
4) Must be all original work
3 of 4 criteria met 2 of 4 criteria met 1 of 4 criteria met Not done Total 150 Points Score = 6/21
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! C