Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Kindly follow all required criteria and word count and mentioned them in the front page
Activity 1
A new performance management system is to be introduced into an organisation.
You are asked to produce a report to enable the HR Director to make a presentation to the board. The Director has asked you to research and include in your report:
- A description of at least two purposes of performance management and their relationships to business objectives.
Assessment criterion: 1.1 Describe the purpose of performance management and its relationship to business objectives.
Describe at least TWO purposes of performance management and its relationship to business objectives. The description should include TWO from:
- Setting objectives
- Reviewing performance against those objectives
- Identifying development needs
- Setting new objectives
You need to relate to business objectives e.g. the employee needs to understand the part they have to play in meeting the overall objectives of the organisation. They should be informed how their objectives fit into the overall company objectives which will increase their motivation to meet their own.
An explanation of at least three components of performance management systems.
Assessment criterion: 1.2 Explain the components of performance management systems.
Explain THREE components of performance management systems. Consider the environment that the person works in – is it conducive to a good working atmosphere?
Components could be THREE from:
- Factors affecting individual performance
- Factors affecting team performance
- Training & development
- Job descriptions
- Informal and formal reviews
- Setting objectives
- Appropriate policies and procedures
- Performance Management data
An explanation of the relationship between motivation and performance management with reference to at least 2 motivational theories.
Assessment criterion: 1.3 Explain the relationship between motivation and performance management.
Explain the relationship between motivation and performance management, referring to at least TWO motivational theories.
Motivated employees:
- Work harder and are more willing to help out in difficulties.
- Want to achieve their individual objectives and goals.
- Perform more effectively.
You need to support this relationship by exploring at least TWO motivation theories, such as:
- Maslow
- Locke
- Herzberg
- Vroom
- Adams
- Taylor
- McClelland
- Mayo
- Pink
This list is not definitive so you can choose others as long as they are recognised theories. Choose the ones that mean the most to you.
You must ensure that the two explained motivational theories relate to performance management. In simple terms, explain what people need to perform and how is this implemented through performance management?
An explanation of at least two purposes of reward within a performance management system.
Assessment criterion: 2.1 Explain the purpose of reward within a performance management system.
Explain TWO purposes of reward within a performance management system, including what the benefits are.
You could include TWO from the following:
- Increases motivation
- Attracting talent and being an employer of choice due to pay, benefits, training, etc.
- Retention
- Motivation
- Productivity
- tting involved in company projects, flexible working.
- Identification and explanation of at least three components of a total reward system, one of which should be non-financial.
Assessment criterion: 2.2 Identify and explain the components of an effective total reward system.
Describe what a total-reward system is, i.e. financial reward + non-financial reward; one must be non-financial.
Describe at least THREE components of a total reward system, ONE of which should be non-financial.
- Financial rewardsare: pay, pensions, bonus, paid holidays, paid overtime, shift premium, healthcare, personal insurance, and company car.
- Non-financial rewards are: Training and development, employee of the month, praise, career progression, getting involved in company projects, flexible working.
Identification and explanation of at least four factors that need to be considered when managing performance, both good and bad.
Assessment criterion: 3.1 Identify and explain the factors that need to be considered when managing performance.
Explain the factors that should be considered when managing good and poor performance. You need to ensure you address the factors in respect of managing performance.
Your explanation should be split into:
- Good:Financial reward; praise; deputising for seniors; teaching/mentoring/coaching others; work on projects; promotion etc.
- Poor:You should differentiate between capability (can’t do) and conduct (won’t do). Find out what the problem is: empathy; support; action planning (SMART targets); training; mentoring /coaching by a good performer; change of duties or job etc.
Ultimately, following the disciplinary process may be necessary and this may lead to dismissal.
You must include good and poor performance.
- A description of at least two sources of data (1 of which should be external to the organisation) required by individuals involved in performance and reward management processes.
Assessment criterion: 3.2 Describe the data required by individuals involved in performance and reward management processes.
Describe at least 2 items of data, including ONE external to the organisation.
You must describe the data i.e. what it is and what it is used for.
Examples could include:
- Internal:Absence records – to improve; payroll costs – to compare against budget; staff satisfaction survey – to gauge where improvements are required. Appraisal scoring system or data, disciplinary warnings, retention figures and training courses.
- External:Labour market – supply and demand; inflation rates – to gauge pay rises; competitor pay rates – to benchmark own rates.
One of the items of data must be external.
- An explanation of the frequency, purpose and process of performance reviews.
Assessment criterion: 4.1 Explain the frequency, purpose and process of performance review.
You must provide an explanation of:
- Frequency:should be fit for purpose: could be annual, 6 monthly or quarterly – state the range and use your own organisation as an example.
- Purpose:performance; development; new objectives and how they fit with organisation’s objectives. Identify any training needs.
- Process:Explain what should happen before, during and after the review. This process will be individual to each person and they can describe what the process is in their own organisation or one they are familiar with.
Activity 2- this activity has been conduct from the dialogue for performance review you already provided just consider and focus on the written part.
Prepare for and conduct a performance review meeting. The performance review is to be videoed. Your review meeting will be observed by an assessor and recorded using the observation record.
Activity 2 must be submitted by the end of week 4, already submitted.
Important notes:
- Click here to download your Skills Assessment Case Study
- You need to film your appraisal and you will need a partner to play the part of the appraise.
Go back to the Study week for guidance on creating your video.- Your appraisal should last around 15 minutes. Anything under 10 minutes or over 20 minutes will be automatically referred.
- You must complete the performance review form and include with your main assessment.
Download the performance review form.
- In activity 3 you will be required to consider the feedback from your assessor and provide a 400-word reflection on how you felt you performed during your appraisal.
- There is a separate submission area and submission date for your appraisal video, in week 4.
- You can’t pass the final assessment without your performance review form, observation record and reflection.
Once you have received feedback for your appraisal you are ready to complete the remainder of your assessment. Please follow the detailed study guide below.
Activity 3
Write a reflective statement, in which you include the following:
- reflect on the outcomes of the performance review meeting
- reflect on your own performance in conducting that meeting
- record 2 key learning points, to develop review meetings in the future.
Assessment criterion: 4.3 Reflect on the outcomes of the performance review
Your reflection should make full use of the observer’s feedback.
You must explain your effectiveness and how you could improve in approximately 400 words (+/- 10%).
Note: This is a different reflection from your journal entry required for 4DEP
Evidence to be produced:
Activity 1
Written report of approximately 2,000 words.
Activity 2
Video – minimum 10 minutes, maximum 15 minutes
Performance Review and Feedback Form
Self-appraisal form (only if used in video)
Observation record.
Activity 3
Reflective statement of approximately 400 words.
You should note the command word of the criteria and use as many examples as stated in the criteria guidance above and clearly explain the inclusion of each.
All reference sources should be acknowledged correctly and a bibliography provided where appropriate (these should be excluded from the word count).
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!