3D printing for prosthetic limbs
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
3D printing for prosthetic limbs
Prosthetic limbs have been a valuable tool for individuals who have lost a limb due to injury or illness. However, traditional methods of creating prosthetics can be costly and time-consuming. 3D printing technology has revolutionized the production of prosthetic limbs by offering a more affordable and customizable solution. In this article, we will discuss the benefits of using 3D printing technology for prosthetic limbs and the challenges that must be addressed to make it a widespread reality.
Benefits of 3D Printing for Prosthetic Limbs
Affordability
One of the biggest benefits of 3D printing for prosthetic limbs is affordability. Traditional prosthetic limbs can be expensive, making them out of reach for many people. 3D printing allows for the creation of prosthetic limbs at a lower cost, making them more accessible to those who need them.
Customizability
Another benefit of 3D printing for prosthetic limbs is customizability. Each person’s needs and preferences are different, and traditional prosthetic limbs may not meet these individual needs. 3D printing allows for the creation of custom prosthetic limbs that are tailored to the individual’s specific requirements. This includes the shape, size, and function of the prosthetic limb.
Speed
3D printing also allows for a faster production time. Traditional prosthetic limbs can take weeks or even months to produce, which can be a hindrance for those who need them urgently. 3D printing allows for the production of prosthetic limbs in a matter of days, which can be lifesaving in emergency situations.
Challenges of 3D Printing for Prosthetic Limbs
Accuracy
One of the challenges of 3D printing for prosthetic limbs is accuracy. The 3D printing process can result in imperfections or inaccuracies, which can affect the functionality of the prosthetic limb. It is important for the prosthetic limb to fit properly and function correctly to ensure the safety and well-being of the user.
Durability
Another challenge of 3D printing for prosthetic limbs is durability. Traditional prosthetic limbs are made from durable materials that can withstand wear and tear over time. 3D printed prosthetic limbs may not have the same durability, and may need to be replaced more frequently.
Regulation
Finally, the regulation of 3D printed prosthetic limbs is a challenge that must be addressed. Traditional prosthetic limbs are regulated by government agencies to ensure their safety and efficacy. However, 3D printed prosthetic limbs may not be subject to the same regulations, which can pose a risk to the user.
Conclusion
In conclusion, 3D printing technology has the potential to revolutionize the production of prosthetic limbs by making them more affordable, customizable, and faster to produce. However, there are challenges that must be addressed to ensure the safety and effectiveness of 3D printed prosthetic limbs, including accuracy, durability, and regulation. With further research and investment, 3D printing technology could become a widespread and valuable tool in the production of prosthetic limbs.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
3D printing for prosthetic limbs
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!