Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Organization Culture and Communication
Throughout the world, organic farming is viewed as a green revolution because it is ecosystem-friendly, and it as well encourages the use of renewable resources (Palaniappan & Annadurai, 2018). The title of the journal is appropriate since it explicitly defines the focus of the research. The study is designed to explore the level of organic food consumption in the United Arab Emirates. The research title is appropriate since it addresses the primary question of the study, which is to evaluate the consumption of organic foods (Al-Taie et al., 2015). It also defines the scope of the study, allowing students and other parties interested in having a better understanding of the results.
The problem statement of this study is not clearly stated. The use and consumption of conventional foods have been the trend since time immemorial. The introduction of organic farming and organic food consumption has generated both financial, health, and environmental benefits (Eyhorn et al., 2019). Although not a common trend, the study is designed to examine how organic food consumption is viewed and being implemented in the United Arab Emirates (Al-Taie et al., 2015). Organic foods are environmentally friendly as well as beneficial to the human body since chemicals such as fertilizers are not used during cultivation (Stolze et al., 2017). The study does not include a review of the literature.
The study employed a cross-sectional research design. A questionnaire with closed-end interview questions with different designs and formats was developed. It had two parts; one for demographic features of the research respondents and the other explaining the different viewpoints and opinions on organic foods. The questionnaire contained three variables, namely; social, environmental, and health factors (Al-Taie et al., 2015). The methods of research used to conduct this research study are quantitative. The research used a sample of the United Arab Emirates population to study the consumption of organic products in the country. A random sampling technique was used, and 500 questionnaires were distributed around major cities in the country (Etikan et al., 2016).
The objectives of the study include; determine the degree of organic food usage in the United Arab Emirates, evaluate the user’s perception of the impacts of organic food consumption on both the environment and human health, and examine the forces that hinder the use of organic foods. Also, the study clearly states the research questions that were used to solve the problem statement of the study. The research questions of the study include; 1. To what extent do respondents prefer organic foods to conventional foods? (Al-Taie et al., 2015) 2. What is the respondents’ view on the impacts of organic food on the environment and human health? 3. Factors that deter or limit organic food consumption in the UAE? 4. What can be done to enhance consumer perception of organic food consumption in the UAE? (Al-Taie et al., 2015)
Some probable sources of errors that may impact the results of this study exist. Response errors may come up during the process of data collection. This error arises when research subjects give false and inaccurate responses to the questions (Kleck, 2018). A non-responsive error may as well come up. It occurs when a segment of the research respondents included in the sample size fails to respond to the questionnaire (Singh et al., 2018). Measures to address these challenges if they occur are not highlighted in the study.
The study used a descriptive data analysis technique to analyze the results and findings. This technique of data analysis used numerical averages, midpoints, most common values, highest and lowest values, ratios, and the number of occurrences to explain the extent of organic food consumption in the UAE (Mishra et al., 2019). Study results were presented in figures and tables. According to the respondents of this study, 88.6% had consumed organic foods, and 83.9% of them differentiated conventional from organic foods (Al-Taie et al., 2015). 60.7% of respondents preferred organic to conventional foods, 29.4% had craved organic foods for three years, and 28.4% had been interested in only a year. Besides, 30.8% of the research respondents consume organic foods monthly, while 215 spent money on organic foods weekly (Al-Taie et al., 2015).
During the study, although not clearly stated, some challenges were experienced. The questionnaire distribution and collection processes were challenging and time-consuming (Greener, 2018). The respondents were selected from different towns in the UAE, which meant that questionnaires had to be handed and collected manually. Another challenge was to convince random citizens to participate in the research. The majority of participants asked for incentives, which proved difficult due to budget constraints.
In conclusion, younger people are becoming more aware of the benefits of organic food consumption to both the environment and the human body (Hamilton & Hekmat, 2018). In the study, the majority of participants preferred organic foods over conventional ones and ate more chocolates, fruits, and fish more than other organic products. Most participants in the study consumed organic food products to conserve the environment or as a new lifestyle trend. Others consume organic food to acquire a certain kind of economic prestige, while others spent money on organic foods once every month (Al-Taie et al., 2015). The findings obtained can be applied directly to my field. Nurses and other health experts should advocate for the implementation of organic food farming to improve both the environment as well as public health.
References
Al-Taie, W. A., Rahal, M. K., AL-Sudani, A. S., & AL-Farsi, K. A. (2015). Exploring the consumption of organic foods in the United Arab Emirates. Sage Open, 5(2), 2158244015592001.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2158244015592001
Etikan, I., Alkassim, R., & Abubakar, S. (2016). Comparison of snowball sampling and sequential sampling technique. Biometrics and Biostatistics International Journal, 3(1), 55.
https://www.academia.edu/download/42569290/BBIJ-03-00055.pdf
Eyhorn, F., Muller, A., Reganold, J. P., Frison, E., Herren, H. R., Luttikholt, L., … & Smith, P. (2019). Sustainability in global agriculture driven by organic farming. Nature Sustainability, 2(4), 253-255.
Greener, S. (2018). Research limitations: the need for honesty and common sense. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(5), 567-568.
Hamilton, K., & Hekmat, S. (2018). Organic food and university students: a pilot study. Nutrition & Food Science.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/NFS-06-2017-0127/full/html
Kleck, G. (2018). Response errors in surveys of defensive gun use: a national internet survey experiment. Crime & Delinquency, 64(9), 1119-1142.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0011128718763138
Mishra, P., Pandey, C. M., Singh, U., Gupta, A., Sahu, C., & Keshri, A. (2019). Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Annals of cardiac anesthesia, 22(1), 67.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6350423/
Palaniappan, S. P., & Annadurai, K. (2018). Organic Farming Theory & Practice. Scientific publishers.
Singh, P., Singh, R., & Bouza, C. N. (2018). Effect of measurement error and non-response on an estimation of population mean. Investigación Operacional, 39(1), 108-120.
http://www.invoperacional.uh.cu/index.php/InvOp/article/viewFile/588/550
Stolze, M., Piorr, A., Häring, A. M., & Dabbert, S. (2017). Environmental impacts of organic farming in Europe. Universität Hohenheim, Stuttgart-Hohenheim.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!